Jump to content

Schmuck: O's interested in Sexson


section36

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 161
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Just let Huff play 1B until you trade him.

Totally agree. Don't see the point of bringing in Hinske or Casey. Sexson at least has an upside, but I would still rather have Huff at 1B, Scott DH, and Reimold/Montanez in LF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Give Richie Sexson a try. If we do sign him we have nothing to loose only to gain. If he gets his act back togather he could be a 30+ homer guy. If we don't ink Dunn or another hitter Dunn would fill that DH role. Crow can maybe fix the swing and get it togather. He more then likely won't have a Major-League deal though so i be happy giving him Minor League deal. Also if we get into a brawl in ESPN on OD he can help out big he is 6' 8

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I'd sure as hell take him over Hinske or Casey.

AM is getting better....He's thinking upside/potential, even if it's just for this season.

Still would be a joke of a move at this point for us but it's better than getting a guy who you just know is going to suck.

I know Sexon is going to suck, so yes it would be a joke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Sexson is a bad experiment if he's signed to a minor league deal, but why are they so anxious to get a 1 year first baseman.

It's really rediculous that they have no faith in Reimold/Montanez/Scott/Salazar in some way filling LF and DH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...