Jump to content

Schmuck: O's interested in Sexson


section36

Recommended Posts

Let me preface my take by saying this: I am all for Huff at 1B, Scott/Reimold/Montanez at DH and LF.

Richie Sexson is not a bad signing.

Will he suck: probably

Could he be lightening in a bottle: maybe

The guy has hit 40 HR before, was consistently in the 30's. This is just like the Pena situation. It's a risk, but what the hell do we have to lose?

Not necessarily, I see your point, but there is less upside with Sexson than there was with Pena.

Pena was 28 when he joined TB, and didn't play much the year before.

Sexson is 33 and hit 12 homers last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 161
  • Created
  • Last Reply
ever since the drug-testing began, his numbers declined each year.

Pass

How badly do the O's want to clinch last place? Do they really have to sign and play these types of players too?

No...actually, they don't. There are actually free agents...let me repeat that...FREE AGENTS...out on the market right now that are young enough to be here for a few years and ACTUALLY...get this...BE PRODUCTIVE.

Amazingly enough, they are young enough that we could have them when...*snicker*...we could be competitive again!

And the big key is...drum roll please...we have NO POSITION PROSPECTS THAT ARE READY TO FILL ANY OF THESE ROLES IN THE NEAR FUTURE! Let me rephrase that...we actually have one, but we won't give him a chance. Hello! Paging Mr. Reimold! There's a bus for Norfolk waiting in front of the hotel for you Mr. Reimold!

So, we'll wind up with a platoon of Sexson and Hinske at first, and Salazar probably just pulled up the Sun's website and said "I'm OPS'ing 1100 down here and they want to sign WHO??".

OK...now that my insane rant is over....where's my pitchfork? :mwahaha:

:drek::drek::drek:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not necessarily, I see your point, but there is less upside with Sexson than there was with Pena.

Pena was 28 when he joined TB, and didn't play much the year before.

Sexson is 33 and hit 12 homers last year.

That's true. Again, I'm not advocating Sex(t)son, but we should be taking risks on players that have shown promise before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously...How can you look at the state of the franchise, see what we are lacking and say that Hinske, Sexson or Casey make more sense than playing Reimold every day?

There is no justification for that type of decision.

He's probably doing it just to piss you off. I know I would be doing that if I were in his shoes.

:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ARRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

:cussing::cussing::cussing::cussing::cussing:

:angryfire::angryfire::angryfire:

:rolleyestf:

And people wonder why I give the Orioles organization such a hard time?

MSK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He wouldn't be that bad.

I would take a chance on him.

For a one year deal. That is about it.

Why though? What's the point? Particularly for a one year deal?

Let's say he does have a big year. We catch the proverbial lighting in a bottle. So what? He's then 34 years old and too much of a risk to offer a long term contract in order to retain him. He goes somewhere else in 2010.

Meanwhile he pushes Huff to DH, keeps Scott in left and keeps us from giving Reimold a shot. What is the point here? We need to think long term!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • A lot of teams are pretty injured and have worse depth than us. I'm not saying that's the reason, but it's a reason to believe maybe we can maintain our offense throughout the season better than other teams. 
    • This is probably as close to clicking on all cylinders as most teams get.  In any given 24-game period, some guys will be up and others down.  We have 9 players with an OPS+ of 116 or higher.  The four guys you mentioned will have hotter periods, and someone else will be cold then.  That’s baseball.  But the ratio of hot players to cold ones is really good right now. 
    • I don’t see it.  Project guy.  Good upside but can’t see that in the first round. I think they go corner with the first pick unless someone unexpectedly drops. The assumption has been Oline but I think the draft is so deep and so many teams will be taking tackles that the Ravens will elect to wait until later in the draft to get Oline and WR help. Its not a deep corner draft, so getting one early makes sense. If they trade up, I wouldn’t think they trade anything higher than a 4th..could move up 3-6 spots. Trade back will likely get them a pick for next year.
    • Gunnar is our Kyle Tucker but at a more premium position.  
    • I said Gunnar earlier. Before this season, I could have seen a case for Adley.  And I love Adley, great hitter (I don't think he's ever going to be a big power guy, but plate approach, contact, key hits, he's great) leader, heart and soul, etc.   But it's clearly Gunnar.  I didn't expect him to be this good, this fast.  He's separating himself from the rest of the pack, not only on this team but throughout the league. Whether or not an extension can happen is a different story altogether.  But Gunnar's the guy I'd go with first.
    • It is early, but the O's have some clear holes that will prevent a World Series run this season. And it looks like there are some teams playing there way out of contention already, barring a massive improvement in performance, making them likely sellers. At a quick glance, here are the teams that already could be looking to sell at the deadline. Some teams on the list made some offseason moves that signaled they are looking to compete. But early returns aren't looking good, and now they have an old team with pieces someone may find helpful, and without much talent in the pipeline. Tier 1 Losers Rockies White Sox Marlins Tier 2  - Not Looking Good Oakland Giants Angels Astros Cardinals Nationals I haven't really taken much look at the rosters to see what pieces could help us. So, who is selling? And Which of their pitchers have a chance to be on the market?  
    • I still feel like our offense isn't clicking on all cylinders yet. Santander has been down, Adley hasn't found alot of extra base power, Holliday has been a black hole so far, Hays was bad and now injured, Urias hasn't hit well.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...