Jump to content

MacPhail and Markakis


JTrea81

If Markakis isn't extended, is that the final straw?  

160 members have voted

  1. 1. If Markakis isn't extended, is that the final straw?

    • Yes, MacPhail needs to go if he can't extend Nick.
    • No, Markakis probably wanted too much money and he can be traded for a ransom.
    • I've already lost complete confidence in MacPhail.


Recommended Posts

I'm talking about Markakis. I can't be helped if JT's brain is entangled in Teixeira. He claimed the O's low-balled Markakis. I'm just curious if he still thinks so.

As my post a full 8 minutes before yours made more clear.

Why would I bring up Teixeira in this thread? Why would you assume that I did?

I was just quoting your post because that was the one JTrea quoted when he made the Tex reference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Thought you were talking about Tex there. Yes if 6/70 is all Markakis wants, I give it to him especially after lowballing him twice before that. No need to go in with a 6/60 offer. Just give him the 6/70 and get it done. 1.67 million per season is not going to break this team, or at least it shouldn't with MASN money and revenue sharing. Markakis is not a player you want to cheap out on...

See above first sentence...

You must really still have Teixeira on your mind when the post is clearly about Markakis and you think it is about Tex.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hate to disrupt JTrea's MacPhail bashing cause he didn't bring his boy Tex home, but don't all deals have to get approved by Angelos?

This has nothing to do with Tex. I'm asking those people who still believe in MacPhail or are on the fence, if failing to extending Nick would be enough to have them lose complete confidence in him.

I think for the majority it would and I'm just curious to see if it's true...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hate to disrupt JTrea's MacPhail bashing cause he didn't bring his boy Tex home, but don't all deals have to get approved by Angelos?

Hmmmmm...so the owner absolutelypositivelydefinitelywithouthesitation has to be fired, stripped and banned from future baseball employment should Mr. Markakis choose to keep his options open or test the market?

I think I'm catching on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This has nothing to do with Tex. I'm asking those people who still believe in MacPhail or are on the fence, if failing to extending Nick would be enough to have them lose complete confidence in him.

I think for the majority it would and I'm just curious to see if it's true...

Brand me a minority with your broad brush.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This has nothing to do with Tex. I'm asking those people who still believe in MacPhail or are on the fence, if failing to extending Nick would be enough to have them lose complete confidence in him.

I think for the majority it would and I'm just curious to see if it's true...

Ahhh, whatever dude, you've practically done a 180 on MacPhail since he "failed" to bring in Tex. You're like SG, you want to hate on him soooooooo bad and are just foaming at the mouth, hoping he gives you a bone to jump all over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To get back to the original question, it would not be the final straw fro me if MacPhail did not sign Markakis to an extension THIS offseason.

Obviously he would have to get something done during the season (which is tough depending on the player) or right after it.

So, I can't really go with any of the options listed in the poll. Obviously my answer is a "no", but I don't think Markakis is demanding too much money, or that he should be traded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ahhh, whatever dude, you've practically done a 180 on MacPhail since he "failed" to bring in Tex. You're like SG, you want to hate on him soooooooo bad and are just foaming at the mouth, hoping he gives you a bone to jump all over.

I want to see a plan for competing in 2011 if not sooner because we have the resources to do that. Right now I don't see that...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • A couple of things that I find interesting, Yaqui Rivera - Acquired in the Tanner Scott/Cole Sulser trade with the Marlins. Juan Nunez - Acquired in the Jorge Lopez trade.   Creed Willems - still only 20 and already in A+.  He got off to a big start last year as well and then struggled the rest of the year.  We're a little spoiled with prospect success from the college guys and HS phenoms Mayo, Holliday, and Gunnar.  The HS position players take some time.  
    • Perez threw an inning of rehab last night with Norfolk.  His velocity was down about 1.5 MPH on his sinker, and everything was down a tick, but he was getting some work in and doesn't look too far away from being ready.
    • I don’t trust that guy to be very useful despite the strong start. He’s a good regression candidate. Would rather have Kopech. 
    • O's have Fabian behind Bradfield and Mullins will likely decline after '25 when he becomes a FA. I think one of those two should be able to hold down CF. Beavers could be in the mix as well.
    • Its a total joke that Wagner isn’t it in yet. 
    • I see no dilemma. He’s under team control right now during his best season’s. When he becomes a FA he will be out of his prime. I mean I love Mullins as a player and what he brings. But when we are talking about priorities for extensions, he is nowhere near the top considering you have an MVP caliber 22 year old, an ultra talented top prospect who is 20, and your team leader is 25. Those 3 are the engine that will drive this bus toward postseason glory most probably, not Cedric Mullins. If the Yanks want to give him that kind of contract while we retain 2 out of the 3 if Henderson, Rutschman, and Holliday; then so be it!  What I shudder to think about is a prime Henderson or Holliday crushing it for one of our competitors so that we can have a declining CF. Didn’t we just do that the last go around? Where we choose to resign the (predictably) declining player while we let the younger/more talented player leave? Yes, I agree that Bradfield Jr’s development is important. But since Elias/Sig have been here they haven’t struck out on any first round picks. Also, if Bradfield proves to be a bust, they can always draft and/or develop another CF type.
    • Thanks, I missed that detail probably multi-tasking in the game thread. I do think Kimbrel has a good shot*...Wagner should go in next cycle, and the electorate in the coming years will be wrestling with how Epstein, Friedman, etc. have improved per pitch efficiency by downsizing the workload literally any individual pitcher can shoulder.      There can't not be any Hall of Famers with all this run prevention going on.    I think now that he's officially retired Strasburg will be a good debate.    Bumgarner too, though I don't believe I've seen that guy yet admitting any retirement. *better shot if say he can get the last out of an important postseason series or three in 2024.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...