Jump to content

22 games left - what non-rookie performances are important to you?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

There are 22 games to play.  Obviously we want to win as many as possible.  Obviously, we want to see the rookies play and we want them to perform well.

Other than that, whose performances over the last 22 games are most important to you?

For me, the top one is Dean Kremer.  He’s had a really nice year and I’d like to see him finish strong.   Second is probably Tyler Wells, who needs to show that the injury didn’t throw him off track.  

I’m not sure I’d say any performance by a non-rookie position player is more important than another at this stage.  For personal reasons, I’d like to see Austin Hays close strong after a rough 2* months, just because I like him.  And I’d like to see Jorge Mateo start hitting because he’s in the biggest trough at the moment.  
 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You already named the two that came to mind for me-- Kremer and Mateo.

They're both essentially second year players who flopped on their first entries to the big leagues, have shown enough this year to become part of the future conversation, but not enough to be fully confident they can repeat their success next year. They're two potential key contributors whose expected contribution levels are still being established.

More minorly the above is true about Tate, Perez, and Akin in the bullpen. I'd like to be able to pencil them into next year's pen and the larger their success sample size gets the better. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Basically anybody that can be trade bait this offseason for a TOR Starter or more upper level prospects

Mullins - If he finishes hot, he could push 4.0 WAR,  lead the league in steals, and bring home a GG; a CF in his prime could be the center piece for a starter

Urias - Pushing 4.0 WAR and mostly for his dWAR as his OPS+ is 99 at the moment. If he finished hot with the bat and won a GG, I could see him being part of a trade possibly with Mullins and prospects for that TOR

Mateo - Like to see him push his SLG over .400, win a GG, and lead the league in SBs. SS in his prime, more trade bait

Santander - 30+ Dingers and push over .800 OPS.  Who needs a switch hitting slugger? Stock may never be higher. I feel like him and Mateo would be dealt for prospects

I'm also hoping Hays and Mountcastle can finish hot but I'm not sure if they have much trade value at the moment.  I'd like to see Mountcastle get over 25 HRs. If Hays could finish 22 like he did 21, he might be able to get to 20 HRs

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Mountcastle don’t show some signs of life, I feel they may need to go back to the drawing board with him. I’m just not seeing a lot there to get excited about when we’re actually in contention.  
 

In addition to the above, I’m also morbidly curious how the guys we traded away fare. So far, both Mancini and Lopez are playing at exactly a 0.0 bWAR clip for their new clubs. Hopefully Trey can turn it on in the postseason, he deserves it.
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously there's some pitching that we would like to see finish strong. Beyond that, I'd like to see how Mateo and Urias finish. 

 

The team needs to add talent somewhere... will either of those 2 be replaced, or will they show enough with the bats to earn a spot on the 23 team? We know that they both have the defensive chops.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, maybenxtyr said:

Obviously there's some pitching that we would like to see finish strong. Beyond that, I'd like to see how Mateo and Urias finish. 

 

The team needs to add talent somewhere... will either of those 2 be replaced, or will they show enough with the bats to earn a spot on the 23 team? We know that they both have the defensive chops.

The Orioles and Hyde have clearly put an every day value behind the perceived defensive value of Hays, Mateo, Urias, Odor, Mountcastle. I think you certainly need guys that can field the ball at an elite level, and you can get away with 1-2 guys who are elite but not as good offensively, but at some point you need guys that can field AND hit. You cant have four guys who have OBP less than .300. Odor will be gone, but there are a lot of decisions to be made with Hays, Mounty, Urias and Mateo moving into the offseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd really like to see all the young guys finish out strong.   The ones that really need to step it up a notch are Hays and Mountcastle in my opinion.   The season is a grind, but these guys seem to have fallen off a cliff.   Hays has OPS'd .566 and .638 in July/August and Mouncastle .541/.630.   That's long, unproductive time for two guys who should be around their peaks.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

#1 for me is Tyler Wells. Posting a few 'quality' starts (not necessarily the textbook definition) coming off his injury carries more meaning than what a 22-game sample would do for others.

 

But I'm hoping for an improved OBP in a host of position players/hitters (Mounty, Hays, Mateo).  But the one guy with the biggest range of outcomes/questions/confidence is... 

Jorge Mateo - I'd like to see some plate discipline.  He's got all sorts of talent and athleticism, it's the mental side of hitting that he could develop a bit more.  Even if the K% doesn't change, a better OBP would go a long way to up his game.  .270 OBP in 2022 is significantly off the .328 rate from 2021.  

From an org perspective:  A big finish for Hays would help the OF depth.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Urias - stay steady, keep improving 

Mateo - small improvements hitting 

Mountcastle - show me something 

Hays - show me you have a heartbeat 

Mullins - end strong and set tone for 2023

Bradish - keep maturing and gaining experience/confidence 

Kremer - show me an out pitch 

Wells - show me some domination and get me excited for next year 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to see Wells come back and pitch well and look healthy.  He was the O's best starter the first half.  If healthy, I have him pencilled in the 2023 rotation.

I would like to see Hall be effective.  If he could have some success as a reliever, it would look promising for him to contribute in 2023 in the majors.  Oops, he's a rookie.

Mullins, finishes strong so he's a better trade chip.

Urias, continue to look like a solid contributor wherever he plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
    • Elias needs to use better judgement when he dumpster dives, prepare better for the high percentage chance that his dumpster diving pickups will fail, and increase usage of other means to get pieces. Bullpen usage is another problem, but it’s hard to effectively juggle flaming torches. A wrong move burns badly 
    • I can see the case for Mountcastle based on defense alone, but what has Kjerstad done to warrant that kind of treatment? Is it the .505 OPS he’s put up since coming back? The overall .438 ML OPS since getting hit in the head? I’m as bummed as anyone that his season got derailed, but if you’re talking about where they are right now — he’s not your huckleberry. As for O’Hearn, he’s 8 for his last 23 (.348), with 3 doubles. That feels a little like the “getting himself together” that you referenced. He had an awful month-long slump, but he also has an extended track record (over 1.5 seasons) of excelling in the role he’s now back in, as the platoon LH 1B/DH guy. He had a 125 wRC+ in those 750 PAs as an Oriole until 8/20, which is roughly when Mountcastle went out.  I’d be good with Kjerstad DHing against LH starters, because there’s good reason to think he hits them better than O’Hearn. And if they want to play both O’Hearn and Kjerstad against some RHPs, in order to set up the potential of Mountcastle coming in to PH against a lefty reliever, I’m down for that too. But the primary alignment is going to (and should) be the Mountcastle/O’Hearn duo we’ve gotten accustomed to seeing.
    • The Achilles heel for this team is going to be the unit that doesn't step up in the postseason. I can easily see scenarios where: the bullpen is hot and provides good performances but the offense sputters and isn't clutch the offense comes up big but the bullpen blows games late starting pitching tosses some clunkers (not really likely with Burnes and Eflin) and they can't recover the defense sucks and gives opponents extra outs to work with, blowing games open when the bullpen or SP would have been able to escape and continue We've seen all of these units falter at one point or another during this season.  We've also seen all of these units perform very well at different times throughout the season.  So, we'll see what turns out to be the Achilles heel for the Orioles in the playoffs starting next week.
    • I agree I missed the mark on a correct forum, and ask a moderator to please relocate to Rants as that game annoyed me yesterday. I appreciate the strong moderators here and know I'm not one of them.     Sorry for making it worse at a tough moment.    I won't bump it again, even ironically if we kick their butts in the playoffs.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...