Jump to content

I've made my decision


RZNJ

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

I don't see that changing either.  I think he is what he is at the plate.  He could still bring a lot of value in a reserve role. 

I’ve very rarely seen a player with bad plate discipline change his stripes significantly, so I don’t really have any expectations that Mateo can do it, only vague hopes.  

I will say this: Santander has made some pretty marked improvements in plate discipline.   
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The more I think about this the more I think it's mostly interchangeable and the real variable is what our players can net in a trade. Mateo and Urias have a similar WAR this year. Urias has four years of team control vs Mateo's three. In the end, I don't think there's a big difference between Urias at 3B and Henderson at SS vs Henderson at 3B and Mateo at SS. We can take the pure best value offer for either Urias or Mateo and keep the other one. Westburg goes to 2B. If Ortiz is ready quickly then we can look to make another deal.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Lately I have noticed a lot of looking K's. To me it is more a question of pitch recognition than discipline per se. Lately at least he has been looking for walks to a fault.

He's not looking for walks.  He's still swinging at high breaking pitches above the strike zone.  It is odd the amount of fastballs he's taken for strikes lately.   As the announcer said, "he's not seeing the ball well right now".    When guys are going bad, they are swinging at balls and taking strikes.   He just needs to go back to a CF and RF approach.   That's the kind of mindset he had back in July when he was going well.    He's just messed up right now, mechanically and mentally.

Edited by RZNJ
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SilverRocket said:

The more I think about this the more I think it's mostly interchangeable and the real variable is what our players can net in a trade. Mateo and Urias have a similar WAR this year. Urias has four years of team control vs Mateo's three. In the end, I don't think there's a big difference between Urias at 3B and Henderson at SS vs Henderson at 3B and Mateo at SS. We can take the pure best value offer for either Urias or Mateo and keep the other one. Westburg goes to 2B. If Ortiz is ready quickly then we can look to make another deal.

Good post.  Good perspective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SilverRocket said:

The more I think about this the more I think it's mostly interchangeable and the real variable is what our players can net in a trade. Mateo and Urias have a similar WAR this year. Urias has four years of team control vs Mateo's three. In the end, I don't think there's a big difference between Urias at 3B and Henderson at SS vs Henderson at 3B and Mateo at SS. We can take the pure best value offer for either Urias or Mateo and keep the other one. Westburg goes to 2B. If Ortiz is ready quickly then we can look to make another deal.

This is a much more succinct way of putting what I've been thinking too.  I had started a bunch of responses looking at each player, position, AL East positional comparisons...  

Long/short:  I think this off season we'll see a rebalancing of the portfolio.  We'll take some MIF profits and reallocate them to lagging SP returns.  I kind of doubt it'll be ML level SP returns though in these trades.  Maybe I'm wrong and it's a package deal for #1-2 SP but I don't think they have the other pieces to finalize that type of deal (like I don't think they trade Mullins without a plan B ready).

From a positional comparison perspective:  Even with just in-house talent, I wouldn't be shocked if we're on par with Toronto's IF total WAR in 2023.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I know this isn’t the question that you asked, but my recollection is that you worked on the business side for the Orioles at some point, so I think you might be able to weigh in on this idea: do you think there are business reasons to extend a Gunnar or an Adley? I know you’re view is generally that extensions are overrated by the fanbase, but that largely seems related to the idea that you are paying for past-peak years (if I’m off base here, it wasn’t intentional—just my recollection). I tend to think that from a business standpoint, an extension for a young player would not make a material difference concerning the amount of tickets sold, revenue generated, etc. and would really just make some people on X happy, but I don’t really have anything to support that opinion.
    • The way he is pitching that's like throwing gas on a fire.
    • I don't think Elias will seriously entertain bringing back Santander.
    • Left the game with 1 run in and 2 on ,2 outs in the 6th and Akin gave up both runs. Bad luck tonight in my opinion but I'm sure there are many on here will say he sucks and should be replaced. 
    • Yeah, we're kind of getting off track here since this is a Jackson Holliday thread, but I will say I don't see how Mountcastle gets traded -- and even if he did it would be to unblock Mayo and not Kjerstad.  Both Mounty and Mayo are righties, and it doesn't look like Mayo will play third base anytime soon.  I think two of the prospects need to get traded -- maybe in the offseason or next season -- unless Hays, O'Hearn or Mounty are dealt.  I think there's a chance the O's bring back Santander, but that's a big wildcard too.
    • I was in favor of trading one of Mountcastle/Hays/Santander after last year to make room for prospects like Kjerstad. I see the main issue with trading one of the above or O'Hearn is those players will deliver more value in an Orioles uniform over the return in any trade. I'm leaning towards Elias taking a calculated risk and creating at bats for Kjerstad.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...