Jump to content

Potential trade for Corbin Burnes or Brandon Woodruff


OriolesMagic83

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Fair enough.  We may have a better chance of getting someone considered a little more risky.    We can also afford to take some risk.  Is he the perfect target?  No.    

Well, I think a lot of teams are going after him despite that risk.

We have people talking about 30+M a year and signing him for several years. 
 

Sure, you may take the chance on a 2 year deal but no way he’s only signing for 2 years this time around.

He will very likely sign a regrettable contract. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

Well, I think a lot of teams are going after him despite that risk.

We have people talking about 30+M a year and signing him for several years. 
 

Sure, you may take the chance on a 2 year deal but no way he’s only signing for 2 years this time around.

He will very likely sign a regrettable contract. 

I agree with Rondon but was giving a comparison to Burnes in terms of cost of money and prospects. One name I keep coming back to is Lucas Giolito as a buy low option. White Sox defense is horrid and we may be able to include Hays, Mateo, or Urias.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me, Burns is more valuable and really is the one to target. He'll be 28 all of 2023. He's been healthy this year and is likely to pitch more than 200 innings when it's all said and done.

11-8, 3.11, 10.9Ks/9, 2.4W/9; xFIP= 2.94, FIP/xFIP= 3.27/2.94

He made $6.5M in ARB1 year, he's Arb2 in 2023 and a FA in 2025. So he's going to get about $12-13M next year in ARB2, No telling in 2024. 

He's a ToR guy who is at his peak. The O's should be in "win now" mode in 2023. He makes a ton of sense for this team.

I'm not good at prospect packages so I won't guess what it would take. But if he's available, get it done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spot-checked Baseball Trade Values and was a little surprised they guess Burnes around 3X Woodruff.

MIL Arms Median Surplus Values: Burnes 95, Peralta 70 (four years for him), Woodruff 35

CLE Arms: Bieber 60, Espino 50, McKenzie 30

BAL Bats: Adley 140*, Gunnar 80, Mullins 40, Holliday 40, Cowser 20, Mayo 15, Hays 15, Westburg 15, Mountcastle 15, Santander 10

BAL Arms: Grayson 50, DL Hall 30

Cowser and Mountcastle for Woodruff?

Adley for Burnes and Woodruff?!

*The Adley $140mm surplus value guess presumes 6 more years, so chop 15-25% off if that reduces to 5 more years as seems likely.     If Adley misses Super Two and remains near MLB minimum in 2025, I suppose he might end up with "only" two Arb years before his Club control expires.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For what it's worth, I don't think anything less than a package around Holliday will get it done.  

Are we in a 'win now' mode?  If this is the only goal, I can see a trade with a Holliday package.

Or a 'build a perennial contender' mode?  If this is the bigger goal (and it's been stated), then no way the O's trade with a Holliday package.  We will be stacking talent at the bottom of the conveyer belt for the foreseeable future.  Not trading away top tier talent before it gets to the MLB.

Anything in a tier below is likely part of the discussion.  Hall and Mayo get dicey for me because I'm a sucker for controllable upside.  But Hall is a better fit trading pitching for pitching.  Brewers made out pretty well on the Hader trade, so maybe they'll consider a package around Hall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/35674271/corbin-burnes-arbitration-hurt-relationship-brewers

Here's hoping that Burnes hits the free agency market next year and, uh...well, we're not going to completely botch the offseason like we did this year.

Quote

"Obviously, it's tough to hear. It's tough to take. They're trying to do what they can to win a hearing,'' Burnes told reporters at spring training in Phoenix. "There's no denying that the relationship is definitely hurt from what [transpired] over the last couple weeks. There's really no way of getting around that."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/35674271/corbin-burnes-arbitration-hurt-relationship-brewers

Here's hoping that Burnes hits the free agency market next year and, uh...well, we're not going to completely botch the offseason like we did this year.

 

Imagine being worried about 750k to the point where you damage the relationship with arguably the best pitcher in baseball.

Dollar wise and penny foolish.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/35674271/corbin-burnes-arbitration-hurt-relationship-brewers

Here's hoping that Burnes hits the free agency market next year and, uh...well, we're not going to completely botch the offseason like we did this year.

 

He’s two years from free agency.   Wouldn’t be surprised to see Milwaukee trade him at the deadline if they’re not in the race.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

Does the man bun change anyone's take?    I saw one report the Brewers winning number was $10.01 million, so they were triangulating by the $10,000 to work for their favored outcome with a Cy Young.

 

Wow. Utter stupidity.  You wonder if he demands a trade now.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

How much did they go to arbitration over with Caleb that one time?  300K?

Different situation.  But it happens all the time all over the league.  Just today there were two cases decided involving a $300 k dispute.

I am not someone who believes that teams should just cave in to whatever a player wants, or should always meet a player halfway.   You go as far as you think is reasonable, and draw a line.   If the player is being unreasonable, go to arbitration and beat him.  

Saying that, I don’t think Burnes’ demand was all that unreasonable.  I would have tried to settle this one without a hearing.  Of course, they may have tried.   

 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
    • Elias needs to use better judgement when he dumpster dives, prepare better for the high percentage chance that his dumpster diving pickups will fail, and increase usage of other means to get pieces. Bullpen usage is another problem, but it’s hard to effectively juggle flaming torches. A wrong move burns badly 
    • I can see the case for Mountcastle based on defense alone, but what has Kjerstad done to warrant that kind of treatment? Is it the .505 OPS he’s put up since coming back? The overall .438 ML OPS since getting hit in the head? I’m as bummed as anyone that his season got derailed, but if you’re talking about where they are right now — he’s not your huckleberry. As for O’Hearn, he’s 8 for his last 23 (.348), with 3 doubles. That feels a little like the “getting himself together” that you referenced. He had an awful month-long slump, but he also has an extended track record (over 1.5 seasons) of excelling in the role he’s now back in, as the platoon LH 1B/DH guy. He had a 125 wRC+ in those 750 PAs as an Oriole until 8/20, which is roughly when Mountcastle went out.  I’d be good with Kjerstad DHing against LH starters, because there’s good reason to think he hits them better than O’Hearn. And if they want to play both O’Hearn and Kjerstad against some RHPs, in order to set up the potential of Mountcastle coming in to PH against a lefty reliever, I’m down for that too. But the primary alignment is going to (and should) be the Mountcastle/O’Hearn duo we’ve gotten accustomed to seeing.
    • The Achilles heel for this team is going to be the unit that doesn't step up in the postseason. I can easily see scenarios where: the bullpen is hot and provides good performances but the offense sputters and isn't clutch the offense comes up big but the bullpen blows games late starting pitching tosses some clunkers (not really likely with Burnes and Eflin) and they can't recover the defense sucks and gives opponents extra outs to work with, blowing games open when the bullpen or SP would have been able to escape and continue We've seen all of these units falter at one point or another during this season.  We've also seen all of these units perform very well at different times throughout the season.  So, we'll see what turns out to be the Achilles heel for the Orioles in the playoffs starting next week.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...