Jump to content

Burrell


33rdst

Recommended Posts

I think the Orioles could spend that money better elsewhere.

That refrain is repeateded yearly in Baltimore, except they rarely spend the money better elsewhere. For example : Jamie Walker, Kevin Millar, Jay Payton, Ramon Hernandez, Javy Lopez, Sidney Ponson, Jay Gibbons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply
That refrain is repeateded yearly in Baltimore, except they rarely spend the money better elsewhere. For example : Jamie Walker, Kevin Millar, Jay Payton, Ramon Hernandez, Javy Lopez, Sidney Ponson, Jay Gibbons.

Doesn't mean it ain't true, Andy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just scanned the previous pages and didn't see this mentioned -

I was reading a post about this signing that mentioned all of the good things about it, which included the fact that it didn't cost any draft picks, because Philly didn't offer him arbitration. That floored me at first glance. The guy's last four OPS+ seasons are 128, 122, 127, 125. It seems crazy to let that production go without at least getting draft picks.

I did see that he made $14.25M in 2008, which probably means he'd get at least that much in arbitration, but if what people said previously in this thread about him turning down some big contracts from Philly is true, why wouldn't they just assume he'd turn down arbitration anyway? It just seems like having Burrell for one year at $15M or getting draft picks is a good thing either way, and I don't see why Philly didn't offer arbitration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suspect the Phillies felt that $15M or whatever Burrell would have gotten in arbitration was more than an OPS+ average of 125 was worth risking. It's also possible the Phillies anticipated the depressed FA market -- the economic indicators were already there even before the sub-prime mortgage crisis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suspect the Phillies felt that $15M or whatever Burrell would have gotten in arbitration was more than an OPS+ average of 125 was worth risking. It's also possible the Phillies anticipated the depressed FA market -- the economic indicators were already there even before the sub-prime mortgage crisis.

Not sure about that second part... jumping to sign Ibanez for 3 yrs/$31.5mm and surrendering picks to do it does not suggest a depressed market to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...
Criticizing the O's for not signing Burrell would be like criticizing the 2004 or 2005 Rays for not signing a league-average DH. Like, say, Aubrey Huff. Instead they shed Huff and continued about their business of acquiring young and/or cheap talent.

An interesting read from top to bottom about one of last years "right handed power bats".

Anyone think going back in time and signing Burrell would have solved anything for the 2010 Orioles?

Perspective:

After 2008: age 31, four straight years of >120 OPS+, seemingly the definition of a consistent right-handed power bat

Two year contract from Rays: 09:$7M, 10:$9M

2009 stats: .221/.315/.367 in 122 games

Seems to be a pretty good example of a "cheap" 2 year stop gap available on the free agent market each year - with the benefit of hind sight.

[Note: Nice post on this a year ago Drungo]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An interesting read from top to bottom about one of last years "right handed power bats".

Anyone think going back in time and signing Burrell would have solved anything for the 2010 Orioles?

Perspective:

After 2008: age 31, four straight years of >120 OPS+, seemingly the definition of a consistent right-handed power bat

Two year contract from Rays: 09:$7M, 10:$9M

2009 stats: .221/.315/.367 in 122 games

Seems to be a pretty good example of a "cheap" 2 year stop gap available on the free agent market each year - with the benefit of hind sight.

[Note: Nice post on this a year ago Drungo]

"Cheap" as in falling off a cliff? Yes, nice call by Drungo as usual.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
    • Elias needs to use better judgement when he dumpster dives, prepare better for the high percentage chance that his dumpster diving pickups will fail, and increase usage of other means to get pieces. Bullpen usage is another problem, but it’s hard to effectively juggle flaming torches. A wrong move burns badly 
    • I can see the case for Mountcastle based on defense alone, but what has Kjerstad done to warrant that kind of treatment? Is it the .505 OPS he’s put up since coming back? The overall .438 ML OPS since getting hit in the head? I’m as bummed as anyone that his season got derailed, but if you’re talking about where they are right now — he’s not your huckleberry. As for O’Hearn, he’s 8 for his last 23 (.348), with 3 doubles. That feels a little like the “getting himself together” that you referenced. He had an awful month-long slump, but he also has an extended track record (over 1.5 seasons) of excelling in the role he’s now back in, as the platoon LH 1B/DH guy. He had a 125 wRC+ in those 750 PAs as an Oriole until 8/20, which is roughly when Mountcastle went out.  I’d be good with Kjerstad DHing against LH starters, because there’s good reason to think he hits them better than O’Hearn. And if they want to play both O’Hearn and Kjerstad against some RHPs, in order to set up the potential of Mountcastle coming in to PH against a lefty reliever, I’m down for that too. But the primary alignment is going to (and should) be the Mountcastle/O’Hearn duo we’ve gotten accustomed to seeing.
    • The Achilles heel for this team is going to be the unit that doesn't step up in the postseason. I can easily see scenarios where: the bullpen is hot and provides good performances but the offense sputters and isn't clutch the offense comes up big but the bullpen blows games late starting pitching tosses some clunkers (not really likely with Burnes and Eflin) and they can't recover the defense sucks and gives opponents extra outs to work with, blowing games open when the bullpen or SP would have been able to escape and continue We've seen all of these units falter at one point or another during this season.  We've also seen all of these units perform very well at different times throughout the season.  So, we'll see what turns out to be the Achilles heel for the Orioles in the playoffs starting next week.
    • I agree I missed the mark on a correct forum, and ask a moderator to please relocate to Rants as that game annoyed me yesterday. I appreciate the strong moderators here and know I'm not one of them.     Sorry for making it worse at a tough moment.    I won't bump it again, even ironically if we kick their butts in the playoffs.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...