Jump to content

Correa opts out…should the Os pursue him?


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, bpilktree said:

I can’t see them signing Haniger, Judge, and Correa.  That lot of money on bats.

I can't say for sure, but Baerga has often been right with his predictions. Looking at the roster for the Giants it could make sense, and they are a big market team that can theoretically afford it. It's no secret they have a huge offer out to Judge. Correa would seem to be independent of Haniger, IMO. Crawford is old, Giants may look to move him to 3rd for the last year of his deal and slide Correa in at SS. Haniger, Pederson and Judge can rotate through the corner OF spots and DH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Brooks The Great said:

I would love this if it happened. Cashman would sink the Yankees even further by panicking to fill the Judge void with overrated and overpriced veteran hitters of some sort (probably trading more prospects like he did with the Gallo trade).

Might see the Yankees pivot to the remaining pitching on the market in that case. Maybe they would go after Rodon and bring Taillon back in that case?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Es4M11 said:

I can't say for sure, but Baerga has often been right with his predictions. Looking at the roster for the Giants it could make sense, and they are a big market team that can theoretically afford it. It's no secret they have a huge offer out to Judge. Correa would seem to be independent of Haniger, IMO. Crawford is old, Giants may look to move him to 3rd for the last year of his deal and slide Correa in at SS. Haniger, Pederson and Judge can rotate through the corner OF spots and DH.

That would put them at around 230 million.  They usually run in the 170 range.  That seems like a huge jump even for big market team.   It possible but I think there pitching is not enough even with adding that offense.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, bpilktree said:

That would put them at around 230 million.  They usually run in the 170 range.  That seems like a huge jump even for big market team.   It possible but I think there pitching is not enough even with adding that offense.  

Well, it may only be for a year they run a payroll that high. After 2023 the Giants have $68,650,000 coming off the books. This retool makes some sense for them. I agree they are light on pitching, but they may come back to the market next year to acquire what they need for arms. Looks reasonable to me for a team with those resources.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, bpilktree said:

That would put them at around 230 million.  They usually run in the 170 range.  That seems like a huge jump even for big market team.   It possible but I think there pitching is not enough even with adding that offense.  

Giants have been over 200 million before.  Wouldn't surprise me to see them there again this offseason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

Giants have been over 200 million before.  Wouldn't surprise me to see them there again this offseason. 

They have been over 200 million once on 26 man and that was 200.5 million.   They will be at 235 and with very little pitching at all.  Alex Cobb would be their number 2 pitcher.   They were middle of pack in starter ERA last year and lose their best pitcher in Rondon.  I can’t see them challenging the Dodgers and Padres with the pitching they have right now even with the guys they sign on offense.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • The Achilles heel for this team is going to be the unit that doesn't step up in the postseason. I can easily see scenarios where: the bullpen is hot and provides good performances but the offense sputters and isn't clutch the offense comes up big but the bullpen blows games late starting pitching tosses some clunkers (not really likely with Burnes and Eflin) and they can't recover the defense sucks and gives opponents extra outs to work with, blowing games open when the bullpen or SP would have been able to escape and continue We've seen all of these units falter at one point or another during this season.  We've also seen all of these units perform very well at different times throughout the season.  So, we'll see what turns out to be the Achilles heel for the Orioles in the playoffs starting next week.
    • I agree I missed the mark on a correct forum, and ask a moderator to please relocate to Rants as that game annoyed me yesterday. I appreciate the strong moderators here and know I'm not one of them.     Sorry for making it worse at a tough moment.
    • Nail hit on head. It really comes down to the offense in the playoffs for us. I think our pitching is good enough overall especially the starters. Shaky sometimes sure, but they can hold their own most of the time. If we don't bring our "A" hitting game in the playoffs we won't go far.
    • The bullpen has warts for sure, but if this offense doesn't figure out how to hit good pitching in the playoffs, the bullpen won't matter. Even I got a little excited when they put 5 and 9 up on the board Tues and Wed, and then it crashed back to reality last night when I remembered they were facing Schmidt and Stroman. When facing a real ace like Cole they were completely shut down. What's gonna happen next week when they face Skubal, Reagins, and/or Lugo? The mediocre bullpen won't matter if they can't figure out how to score some runs off pitchers like that...
    • Why carry four 1 inning guys over a LH long option? Cionel stinks and should not be on the roster over Povich when you still have Akin, Coulombe and Soto.
    • Really would be nice to win tonight OR have DET lose so then they can play around Sat/Sun when the games would have no bearing on the seeding. Dont want this to come down to Sunday and having to win to get the 4 seed or then there will be some tough decisions that have to be made.
    • Looking for a big performance from him next week. This is why he’s here. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...