Jump to content

What is the real reason for our off season?


DocJJ

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I basically made these same points on 105.7 yesterday. We have treaded water at best so far this offseason and missed out on several starting pitchers that could have improved the team. But, there's still the trade market in January and into early February as the key FA pieces have fallen into place.

We've had Elias at the helm for a few years now, enough to start understanding patterns and trends, I believe.

I've stated before that the only time Elias seems aggressive on the trade market is at the deadline during the season.  He's never been aggressive via trades in the offseason and I don't expect that to change right now.  The McCann trade was nice, it addressed a need but it's not going to be anything that helps vault this team to the next level.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

We've had Elias at the helm for a few years now, enough to start understanding patterns and trends, I believe.

I've stated before that the only time Elias seems aggressive on the trade market is at the deadline during the season.  He's never been aggressive via trades in the offseason and I don't expect that to change right now.  The McCann trade was nice, it addressed a need but it's not going to be anything that helps vault this team to the next level.  

I wouldn't even say he was agressive at the deadline.   Looks to me like he waited until someone was willing to pay "his" price.   I do think he's cautious in both spending and trading.    That's not always a bad thing.

He said he was looking for buy side trades.   Like the McCann trade, he's looking for someone in a weakened position looking to move salary.   That should be put Elias in the driver's seat.   So he's looking for situations where he has leverage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

I wouldn't even say he was agressive at the deadline.   Looks to me like he waited until someone was willing to pay "his" price.   I do think he's cautious in both spending and trading.    That's not always a bad thing.

He said he was looking for buy side trades.   Like the McCann trade, he's looking for someone in a weakened position looking to move salary.   That should be put Elias in the driver's seat.   So he's looking for situations where he has leverage.

I don't think anyone is saying that it's always a bad thing.  But it certainly isn't always a good thing either.  There are times for one approach and times for a different approach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't think anyone is saying that it's always a bad thing.  But it certainly isn't always a good thing either.  There are times for one approach and times for a different approach.

I didn't say otherwise.  I agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

That's been my take.

At least until they get hit with the inheritance tax.

"Have wondered about this a number of times this off-season. How much money has the ownership group pocketed the last several years. Could this add up to the group keeping the team, instead. That scares me, since it could take another several offseason’s like this"

From the link I posted earlier around $100m in the tank years, maybe more.  Good idea what revenue rent and salaries are, I have no clue what the other operating expenses and debt service is.  I would guess a large chunk is taken by the family in salary to avoid the 40% inheritance tax.

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Eric Lauer of the Brewers could be a trade target. He doesn’t have the price tag of Pablo Lopez and the Brewers need a 3B. Lauer has been publicly critical of the Brewers FO. Ramon Urias and a prospect seems like a deal?

Interesting name.  I hadn't seen this one before.   A LHP too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, maybenxtyr said:

I thought they had a "war chest" of already saved money ready to dump into the team? 

 

 

Those pesky Pirates stole the chest.  That's how they can afford to spend that much this offseason.

Turns out putting the money in a literal chest and sticking it on a boat in the Bay wasn't a great idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Those pesky Pirates stole the chest.  That's how they can afford to spend that much this offseason.

Turns out putting the money in a literal chest and sticking it on a boat in the Bay wasn't a great idea.

I think it was the Ravens cheerleaders so they could pay Lamar.  I heard one of them start a cheer with "Give me an arrrrrrr...."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Eric Lauer of the Brewers could be a trade target. He doesn’t have the price tag of Pablo Lopez and the Brewers need a 3B. Lauer has been publicly critical of the Brewers FO. Ramon Urias and a prospect seems like a deal?

Lauer for Urias sounds interesting, but, looking at rWAR and fWAR, it seems like MIL is the team that should be adding to the deal, not BAL.  No?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, AnythingO's said:
Year Revenue Salaries Payroll+Exp Rev-Exp Op Income Op Cost
2014 245 110 122 123 31.4 91.6
2015 239 118.9 137 102 8.8 93.2
2016 253 147.7 162 91 -2.1 93.1
2017 252 164.3 183 69 -26 95
2018 251 143 161 90 -6.5 96.5
2019 256 61.1 103 153 57 96
2020 115 23.9 43 72 -23 95
2021 251 45.7 66 185 83 102

I thought I would try to "estimate" the cost of doing business, i.e. Operating Cost. It turns out it is remarkably consistent. To determine what the Payroll + Expenses can be you need to work backwards from Revenue and Operating Cost, it's in the $150 M range (ignoring 2020). Differences between Salaries and Payroll+Expenses is generally in the $15-20 M range but was >$40 M in 2019, don't know why. Difference between Revenue-Exp and Op Income (Profit) is Op Cost. Looks like Payroll + Expenses needs to be about $125-$135 M to be sustainable so salaries in the $110-120 M range until revenue rises.

 

Thanks for your model, correct me if I am wrong but you would then have an operating profit of around $80m in 2021 dollars?  I came up with around $100m in 2022 but there are some expenses I cannot account for.  Thanks! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RZNJ said:

I wouldn't even say he was agressive at the deadline.   Looks to me like he waited until someone was willing to pay "his" price.   I do think he's cautious in both spending and trading.    That's not always a bad thing.

He said he was looking for buy side trades.   Like the McCann trade, he's looking for someone in a weakened position looking to move salary.   That should be put Elias in the driver's seat.   So he's looking for situations where he has leverage.

This is where Lauer fits again. He’s been publicly critical of the Brewers FO 2-3 times. LH. Mid rotation arm. $5.2 projected arb price. Two years of control. Ramon playing with his brother should be good for their clubhouse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Agreed, they were trying to preserve Burnes there. The division still hadn't been clinched, so try to win the game but within the rest management plan for your ace. Hopefully the fact they used Cano means there aren't any major concerns about his rest, but now you have to wonder.
    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...