Jump to content

What is the real reason for our off season?


DocJJ

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

It seems a common assumption to assume the Angelos family owns 80% or more of the team.  One of the things I learned during the Angelos family Orioles control drama was that Tom Clancy and his wife at one time owned 24% of the team.  It seems possible/likely that the Angelos family ownership is 60% or less.  I don't see any Mlb approval of a partial sale that ends up w/ no clear majority owner. 

Many of the minorities owners have sold their stake in the team though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Many of the minorities owners have sold their stake in the team though.

I’m not sure about “many,” but I recall that Angelos had bought out 10-12% of the other shares at some point.  The Clancy estate is still an owner, along with a number of others listed here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I’m not sure about “many,” but I recall that Angelos had bought out 10-12% of the other shares at some point.  The Clancy estate is still an owner, along with a number of others listed here.

SVP of Administration and Experience is an interesting title. Like they couldn’t think of anything else and just said through in experience. He’s been here long enough. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, waroriole said:

SVP of Administration and Experience is an interesting title. Like they couldn’t think of anything else and just said through in experience. He’s been here long enough. 

This practice permeates through much of corporate America.

Yeah he's an unproductive bureaucrat that is a net drain on the company, but he's served his time and hasn't fallen afoul of the new age HR gods... make up something confusing to call his position and promote him.

My favorite all time was Director of Normative Definitions.

No, that's not made up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/29/2022 at 8:55 PM, ThisIsBirdland said:

Per MLB.com for next year's FA class, I see plenty of good options here.

Starting pitcher: Carlos Carrasco, Alex Cobb (club option), Yu Darvish, Jack Flaherty, Lucas Giolito, Sonny Gray, Clayton Kershaw, Lance Lynn (club option), Kenta Maeda, Tyler Mahle, Germán Márquez, Miles Mikolas, Frankie Montas, Jordan Montgomery, Charlie Morton (club option), Aaron Nola, Jake Odorizzi, Shohei Ohtani, Eduardo Rodriguez (opt-out), Hyun Jin Ryu, Max Scherzer (opt-out), Luis Severino, Blake Snell, Marcus Stroman (opt-out), Julio Urías, Alex Wood

If we’re in the race come the trade deadline who  should we be targeting out of those guys?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

I’m not sure about “many,” but I recall that Angelos had bought out 10-12% of the other shares at some point.  The Clancy estate is still an owner, along with a number of others listed here.

Interesting if DeWitt won the bidding and didn't combine with Peter Angelos. The Dewitt family has done a pretty nice job owning the Cardinals  

 

At U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New York, DeWitt and Angelos led two of four groups expected to bid during an auction. Before the auction began, Angelos had absorbed the DeWitt investors, a move expected to keep the bidding from spiraling.

The strategy failed to take into account a third investor, New York art dealer Jeffrey Loria, who drove the winning price of the team $20 million higher than many had predicted.

"In retrospect, it wasn't necessary to take [DeWitt] out of the bidding. But that was the strategy," Angelos said.

After the sale, DeWitt was somewhat involved in Orioles affairs. He attended a team investors meeting in St. Petersburg, Fla., during spring training in 1994, and was a representative of the club at a major-league owners meeting in Cincinnati last June. His partners, who include Ohio businessmen Mercer Reynolds, Robert Castellini and Richard Sutphin, were rarely at Orioles functions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, jrobb21613 said:

If we’re in the race come the trade deadline who  should we be targeting out of those guys?

Tough to know who will be selling and who will be putting up a strong season. I don't expect the Dodgers (Urias) or Phillies (Nola) to be selling. If the Angels are struggling they'll want the world for two months of Ohtani.

Lynn (CWS), Giolito (CWS), Gray (MIN), or Marquez (COL) could be decent rental pieces.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, owknows said:

This practice permeates through much of corporate America.

Yeah he's an unproductive bureaucrat that is a net drain on the company, but he's served his time and hasn't fallen afoul of the new age HR gods... make up something confusing to call his position and promote him.

My favorite all time was Director of Normative Definitions.

No, that's not made up.

The Experience part of the title was something I’d never seen before. Don’t think I wanna unpack any of the rest of that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

It seems a common assumption to assume the Angelos family owns 80% or more of the team.  One of the things I learned during the Angelos family Orioles control drama was that Tom Clancy and his wife at one time owned 24% of the team.  It seems possible/likely that the Angelos family ownership is 60% or less.  I don't see any Mlb approval of a partial sale that ends up w/ no clear majority owner. 

Clancy did own 24% at one point but lost half in his divorce.  I had the good fortune to win five championships in auto racing-I lost two of my rings in my divorce, divorce is a bitch!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SemperFi said:

Clancy did own 24% at one point but lost half in his divorce.  I had the good fortune to win five championships in auto racing-I lost two of my rings in my divorce, divorce is a bitch!!!

Sounds like an interesting story. (The championship rings... not the divorce) 😁

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, owknows said:

Sounds like an interesting story. (The championship rings... not the divorce) 😁

Thanks, it was a big part of my life for a long time.  The two rings from the Indy 500 (I'm not a driver) were worth more than IRL championships, but it would have cost me more in legal fees to fight over it than they were worth.  I was upset for awhile as my name is engraved on them not hers but I think she also wanted to ensure they stayed in the family and didn't go to a GF or future wife.  I really wanted a Daytona winners which is beautiful, came close but never won when I was there. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SemperFi said:

Thanks, it was a big part of my life for a long time.  The two rings from the Indy 500 (I'm not a driver) were worth more than IRL championships, but it would have cost me more in legal fees to fight over it than they were worth.  I was upset for awhile as my name is engraved on them not hers but I think she also wanted to ensure they stayed in the family and didn't go to a GF or future wife.  I really wanted a Daytona winners which is beautiful, came close but never won when I was there. 

Interesting story... and sounds like as is typical, divorce was no fun.

Now you've got me curious whether you were over the wall crew, or shop/engineering.. perhaps another time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Agreed, they were trying to preserve Burnes there. The division still hadn't been clinched, so try to win the game but within the rest management plan for your ace. Hopefully the fact they used Cano means there aren't any major concerns about his rest, but now you have to wonder.
    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...