Jump to content

What is the real reason for our off season?


DocJJ

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, MijiT88 said:

I just want the offseason to be over so we can watch the young kids play and win games and everyone can eat crow at how they demanded 10 free agent signings this offseason

Or ride the pine as they play Frazier and the gaggle of AAAA projects while the kids mostly ride the pine. I knew Nevin was most likely never going to be but he never got an opportunity to play everyday. Watching a poor producing retread at 2B and having Vavra and whomever else that makes the team sit will suck. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

Who demanded 10 free agent signings?

I made a polite request, not a demand. But ask and you shall receive:

  1. Adam Frazier
  2. Mychal Givens
  3. Kyle Gibson
  4. Eduard Bazardo
  5. Franchy Cordero
  6. Nomar Mazara
  7. Wandisson Charles
  8. Kyle Dowdy
  9. Ofreidy Gomez
  10. Josh Lester
  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SemperFi said:

WC I'm going to disagree with your thoughts, at least the last sentence-those are my thoughts exactly, something just doesn't add up.  I too believe there will be a trade, likely Mateo-so many contending teams looking for a SS. 

The more I look at it there is a huge disconnect between revenue and payroll, by my scratch pad calculation the Orioles are one of the most profitable teams  in baseball (between 4-10).  I like the attached as a model, it's 3 years old but doesn't include revenue sharing (or Disney) or corporate income and expenses (from personal experience the O's suck at corporate Yankees among others are very good-I don't have a clue what expenses other than payroll and rent are but would guess the O's are on the very low end). 

I don't subscribe to the theory that payroll is on hold to make the team more attractive to be sold, the type of 1 and 2 year deals discussed have no absolutely no material affect.  Recent franchise sales also discount that theory.  There is a huge disconnect, I just don't see it.

https://www.morssglobalfinance.com/major-league-baseball-finances-what-the-numbers-tell-us/

Your first sentence says that you are disagreeing but it sounds like you are agreeing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

1) You aren’t getting anything of real value for those guys at the deadline.

2) there is zero indication Elias had any 3 year deals on the table.  We know he had multi year deals. We don’t know that they were 3 years.

3) This offseason is a combo of how Elias is going to operate most offseasons, how ownership is cheap and how Elias misread the market.

 

 

Gibson was traded at the deadline in 2021.

Givens was traded at the deadline in 2022.

Prospects were included both times.  The return might be nothing to you but it might be something to Elias.

Edited by wildcard
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Gibson was traded at the deadline in 2021.

Givens was traded at the deadline in 2022.

Prospects were included both times.  The return might be nothing to you but it might be something to Elias.

Givens was traded for a guy who, according to MLb.com, wasn’t a top 30 prospect in the Mets system. I doubt Elias signed guys so that he could deal them at the deadline for one borderline top 50 prospect.

Thats an absurd take to have.

He signed guys to 1 year deals simply because he and ownership don’t want to be tied down to longer term deals and he got players he believes helps the team in 2023.

No need to read anything more into it than that. 

Essentially what you are saying, by bringing up trade values at the deadline, is that Elias has no intention of competing for the playoffs because if they were, he’s not trading anyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Orioles0615 said:

Ah yes watch the young kids play. Just like year when the young kids were delayed and delayed getting called up and then we watched Odor, Aguliar, and Nevin play. 

I fully expect more of the same this year. I am not looking forward to watching Fraizer, Franchy Cordero, and Mazara play. Hell I am still not convinced they don't pull some vodoo BS and have Grayson Rodriguez start in AAA because of his "injury" 

It would be very Orioles of them to somehow have Spenser Watkins in the Opening Day rotation.  And Roch talking him up as being just as good as the free agents we didn't sign. Because Orioles. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Givens was traded for a guy who, according to MLb.com, wasn’t a top 30 prospect in the Mets system. I doubt Elias signed guys so that he could deal them at the deadline for one borderline top 50 prospect.

Thats an absurd take to have.

He signed guys to 1 year deals simply because he and ownership don’t want to be tied down to longer term deals and he got players he believes helps the team in 2023.

No need to read anything more into it than that. 

Essentially what you are saying, by bringing up trade values at the deadline, is that Elias has no intention of competing for the playoffs because if they were, he’s not trading anyone.

Whether Frazier is traded depend on his performance and how Ortiz, Westburg and Utias are doing.

Whether McCann is traded depend on his performance and how Handley is doing.

Whether Gibson is traded depend on his performance and how Hall is doing.

Whether Givens is traded depend on his perform and how many other pitchers are doing.

Remember Elias trade Lopez and Mancini at the deadline for prospects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Yardball85 said:

It would be very Orioles of them to somehow have Spenser Watkins in the Opening Day rotation.  And Roch talking him up as being just as good as the free agents we didn't sign. Because Orioles. 

I think Watkins will be at AAA.  The only way he gets to the rotation is if injuries hit the top 5 starters.   But Watkins did have a 4.17 ERA as a starter last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Whether Frazier is traded depend on his performance and how Ortiz, Westburg and Utias are doing.

Whether McCann is traded depend on his performance and how Handley is doing.

Whether Gibson is traded depend on his performance and how Hall is doing.

Whether Givens is traded depend on his perform and how many other pitchers are doing.

Remember Elias trade Lopez and Mancini at the deadline for prospects.

Yea he did..because he didn’t believe in the team.

If his plan is to do the same thing as of right now, which is what you are insinuating, he doesn’t believe in this team either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

He's totes a #1-#3 pitcher once our Wizard gets done tinkering!

I actually do like Spenser and got some Miguel Gonzalez vibes from him last year.  But my uneducated "vibes" from watching him should not be enough for the Orioles (and Roch) to try to sell him to the fans as a "good" starting pitcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Whether Frazier is traded depend on his performance and how Ortiz, Westburg and Utias are doing.

Whether McCann is traded depend on his performance and how Handley is doing.

Whether Gibson is traded depend on his performance and how Hall is doing.

Whether Givens is traded depend on his perform and how many other pitchers are doing.

Remember Elias trade Lopez and Mancini at the deadline for prospects.

I don't think you pick up someone like McCann with the idea of flipping him.  Unless a young catcher forces the issue or he tanks completely I think he's here for the next two years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Whether Frazier is traded depend on his performance and how Ortiz, Westburg and Utias are doing.

Whether McCann is traded depend on his performance and how Handley is doing.

Whether Gibson is traded depend on his performance and how Hall is doing.

Whether Givens is traded depend on his perform and how many other pitchers are doing.

Remember Elias trade Lopez and Mancini at the deadline for prospects.

These players aren’t getting dealt if they are producing and the team is winning. They are getting dealt if the team isn’t winning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Any jerk wad want to congratulate Duke Basketball or the Steelers? just go ahead and piss me off even more 
    • Agreed, they were trying to preserve Burnes there. The division still hadn't been clinched, so try to win the game but within the rest management plan for your ace. Hopefully the fact they used Cano means there aren't any major concerns about his rest, but now you have to wonder.
    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...