Jump to content

John Angelos chews out Dan Connolly


interloper

Recommended Posts

On 1/16/2023 at 7:42 PM, tntoriole said:

So the only reason there was anything being announced at all was because of the Orioles donating fan generated revenue so Angelos acting like he was being accosted at mass was just his play at PR management .. which he failed. 

John Angelos will probably just say that he is doing everything possible to bring a championship to Baltimore and that the Orioles financial information is publicly available.  Maybe put something in there about the "large sums of money" he has invested in the O's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, interloper said:

mean, $5 million? Chris Davis alone has donated more to this city, and he didn't put out a save-the-date about it and make all these beat reporters come out on a holiday.

Did he?   I’m aware of a $3 mm donation he made.  He may have made others, but then again, the O’s have too.  Overall I think the O’s do a good job with regard to being active in the community.
https://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/orioles/bs-sp-orioles-chris-davis-donation-maryland-childrens-hospital-20191104-4wcvuuzy3vbb3f7ejwlef63e24-story.html

I don’t have a problem with holding a press conference about this.  It gives the College Bound organization some publicity.  There were some aspects of this besides the cash donation worth discussing.   I’m sure the O’s did it for PR purposes, but that’s fine.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Frobby said:

Did he?   I’m aware of a $3 mm donation he made.  He may have made others, but then again, the O’s have too.  Overall I think the O’s do a good job with regard to being active in the community.
https://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/orioles/bs-sp-orioles-chris-davis-donation-maryland-childrens-hospital-20191104-4wcvuuzy3vbb3f7ejwlef63e24-story.html

I don’t have a problem with holding a press conference about this.  It gives the College Bound organization some publicity.  There were some aspects of this besides the cash donation worth discussing.   I’m sure the O’s did it for PR purposes, but that’s fine.  

It's fine if you don't flip out like a weirdo in front of the mayor and totally hijack the spotlight when it should be on the charity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Frobby said:

Did he?   I’m aware of a $3 mm donation he made.  He may have made others, but then again, the O’s have too.  Overall I think the O’s do a good job with regard to being active in the community.
https://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/orioles/bs-sp-orioles-chris-davis-donation-maryland-childrens-hospital-20191104-4wcvuuzy3vbb3f7ejwlef63e24-story.html

I don’t have a problem with holding a press conference about this.  It gives the College Bound organization some publicity.  There were some aspects of this besides the cash donation worth discussing.   I’m sure the O’s did it for PR purposes, but that’s fine.  

29 minutes ago, interloper said:

It's fine if you don't flip out like a weirdo in front of the mayor and totally hijack the spotlight when it should be on the charity. 

This is where i am.  The press conference was maybe a bit much, tho.  Clearly, John expected to be fawned over for the donation and wanted to pontificate on the need for it otherwise the response to Dan's question would have just been, "We'll respond to ballclub issues at another time."  But in true Angelossi fashion, if there is a turd within walking distance, they step in it and sometimes circle around again for a second trod.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, waroriole said:

Hopefully Buster can finally be useful for once and put some pressure on this to occur. Haven’t really seen it anywhere else, except Dan Connolly. 
 

 

It will be interesting to see if Baltimore media will let Angelos sweep his statement that he will show the team's financials next week under the rug.  I think there is no way that Angelos shows his financials as they will reveal how much money he is siphoning off the team.  I'm ready to eat massive crow if John Angelos "opens the books".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

It will be interesting to see if Baltimore media will let Angelos sweep his statement that he will show the team's financials next week under the rug.  I think there is no way that Angelos shows his financials as they will reveal how much money he is siphoning off the team.  I'm ready to eat massive crow if John Angelos "opens the books".

Roch is willing to forget he ever said anything I'm sure!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Frobby said:

I don’t have a problem with holding a press conference about this.  It gives the College Bound organization some publicity.  There were some aspects of this besides the cash donation worth discussing.   I’m sure the O’s did it for PR purposes, but that’s fine.  

...but at the end of the day all anyone remembers about the press conference is the John Angelos petulant billionaire rant. If anything I'd say he completely hijacked the spotlight and selfishly stole the needed attention away from the College Bound organization. That's 100% on him. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If John wants to open the books then I give him permission to use the following. Data for 2022 not yet available:

ME's changes are increasing Operating Costs, Payroll + Expenses is about $15-20 M above Salaries (2019 outlier). If we assume Revenue of $255 M, Operating Cost of $105 M and Payroll+ about $20 M above salaries, that leaves about $130 M for Salaries plus Operating Income (profit). What OI (profit) does John consider acceptable for a $1.375 B franchise?????

Year Revenue Salaries Payroll + Expenses Revenue - Expenses Operating Income Operating Cost
             
2014 245 110 122 123 31.4 91.6
2015 239 118.9 137 102 8.8 93.2
2016 253 147.7 162 91 -2.1 93.1
2017 252 164.3 183 69 -26 95
2018 251 143 161 90 -6.5 96.5
2019 256 61.1 103 153 57 96
2020 115 23.9 43 72 -23 95
2021 251 45.7 66 185 83

102

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AnythingO's said:

If John wants to open the books then I give him permission to use the following. Data for 2022 not yet available:

ME's changes are increasing Operating Costs, Payroll + Expenses is about $15-20 M above Salaries (2019 outlier). If we assume Revenue of $255 M, Operating Cost of $105 M and Payroll+ about $20 M above salaries, that leaves about $130 M for Salaries plus Operating Income (profit). What OI (profit) does John consider acceptable for a $1.375 B franchise?????

Year Revenue Salaries Payroll + Expenses Revenue - Expenses Operating Income Operating Cost
             
2014 245 110 122 123 31.4 91.6
2015 239 118.9 137 102 8.8 93.2
2016 253 147.7 162 91 -2.1 93.1
2017 252 164.3 183 69 -26 95
2018 251 143 161 90 -6.5 96.5
2019 256 61.1 103 153 57 96
2020 115 23.9 43 72 -23 95
2021 251 45.7 66 185 83

102

2021 might not have been a great year for the O's on the field, but it was a great year for John Angelos at the bank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, AnythingO's said:

If John wants to open the books then I give him permission to use the following. Data for 2022 not yet available:

ME's changes are increasing Operating Costs, Payroll + Expenses is about $15-20 M above Salaries (2019 outlier). If we assume Revenue of $255 M, Operating Cost of $105 M and Payroll+ about $20 M above salaries, that leaves about $130 M for Salaries plus Operating Income (profit). What OI (profit) does John consider acceptable for a $1.375 B franchise?????

Year Revenue Salaries Payroll + Expenses Revenue - Expenses Operating Income Operating Cost
             
2014 245 110 122 123 31.4 91.6
2015 239 118.9 137 102 8.8 93.2
2016 253 147.7 162 91 -2.1 93.1
2017 252 164.3 183 69 -26 95
2018 251 143 161 90 -6.5 96.5
2019 256 61.1 103 153 57 96
2020 115 23.9 43 72 -23 95
2021 251 45.7 66 185 83

102

If I remember right I ran it at the same time with 2022 included and also came up with OI (profit) of ~$80.  Remember OI should go up substantially in 2023 with $30m from Disney and increased attendance.  Funny, either Elias or JA was quoted that he expected player salaries to increase relative to attendance-no mention increased revenue from media!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SemperFi said:

If I remember right I ran it at the same time with 2022 included and also came up with OI (profit) of ~$80.  Remember OI should go up substantially in 2023 with $30m from Disney and increased attendance.  Funny, either Elias or JA was quoted that he expected player salaries to increase relative to attendance-no mention increased revenue from media!!

The new media deal increased MLB revenue in 2022 so I expect the O's revenue to rise in 2022 somewhat plus there was the attendance increase. With the low payroll in 2022 I think you are correct that OI (profit) will likely be in that range. I expect some enterprising accountant will find a way to associate the one-time Disney money with MASN versus the MLB franchise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, AnythingO's said:

The new media deal increased MLB revenue in 2022 so I expect the O's revenue to rise in 2022 somewhat plus there was the attendance increase. With the low payroll in 2022 I think you are correct that OI (profit) will likely be in that range. I expect some enterprising accountant will find a way to associate the one-time Disney money with MASN versus the MLB franchise.

Thanks, the other thing I would like to see is itemized salaries-specifically what Angelos pays himself as CEO.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Agreed, they were trying to preserve Burnes there. The division still hadn't been clinched, so try to win the game but within the rest management plan for your ace. Hopefully the fact they used Cano means there aren't any major concerns about his rest, but now you have to wonder.
    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...