Jump to content

John Angelos chews out Dan Connolly


interloper

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, AnythingO's said:

I wonder if there is any way to determine if that $10 M figure includes the current $5 M "pledge" to College Bound?????

I'm pretty sure it doesn't since 

 

12 hours ago, AnythingO's said:

OK Semper Fi, I have tried to find the 2022 data to update the file but it isn't available yet. So, what we know is that Revenue for MLB increased from $9.56 B to $10.8 B in 2022. I took the O's revenue for 2021 out of the $9.56 B for MLB to create an "O's share" ratio and applied it to 2022. If I am right the O's OI rises to $113 M in 2022. Since MLB attendance overall was down 4 M from 2019 when the Revenue was $10.7 B and the new broadcast money doesn't hit until 2023, the only thing I can think of that boosted MLB Revenue to the new record is that the $30 M per team from Disney is counted in MLB Revenue. Estimates in bold, 

Year Revenue Salaries Payroll + Expenses Revenue - Expenses Operating Income Operating Cost
             
2014 245 110 122 123 31.4 91.6
2015 239 118.9 137 102 8.8 93.2
2016 253 147.7 162 91 -2.1 93.1
2017 252 164.3 183 69 -26 95
2018 251 143 161 90 -6.5 96.5
2019 256 61.1 103 153 57 96
2020 115 23.9 43 72 -23 95
2021 251 45.7 66 185 83 102
2022 283 44.88 65 218 113 105

 

I believe this is Forbes data. Forbes used to say (and I think still does) that its revenue and profit numbers doesn't include the revenues that some teams get from their ownership of regional sports networks like MASN.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, eddie83 said:

This reads John used this to benefit his lifestyle. $1.7M to buy a home Saratoga Springs, NY, and another $2.5M was sent to John months later. Both in 2021. 
 

$26.75M transferred to a checking account of his wife. Occurred after a lawsuit vs the firm. To shield assets. 
 

John basically took daddy’s account and did what he wanted. 

I wanted to be clear here. The $26.75M apparently was moved to Georgia’s account. I may have insinuated it went to John’s wife. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, spiritof66 said:

I'm pretty sure it doesn't since 

 

I believe this is Forbes data. Forbes used to say (and I think still does) that its revenue and profit numbers doesn't include the revenues that some teams get from their ownership of regional sports networks like MASN.  

Correct.  The rights fees paid by the RSN are counted, the profits of the RSN are not.  Of course, due to the MASN litigation, neither of those numbers are certain and we don’t know what Forbes uses.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Well the one thing that's openly obvious, the money being spent on the major league team is judicious at best. Their $48,841,666 projected payroll for 2023 is 28th of 20 teams. not exactly a liftoff.

I'm just going to remain as consistent as possible on my feelings on ownership. Whether it's Peter, Georgia, John or Lou running things it's still an Angelos. As long as it's an Angelos running things the organization will be run on a shoe-string budget until it's sold. 

There will be no "lift-offs" or trading for big salaries like they did in Houston to take that next step. 

The number one goal for every Orioles fan should be that this team is sold to an owner that will actually want to pay for a 1st class product that Orioles fans deserve.

They hired the right guy to rebuild the franchise from within with Elias, but I don't believe he's been given the funds to take that next step and he won't as long as the Angelos family drama continues as owners of this franchise.

 

How sad is it that as a life long Washington Redskins / Football Team / Commanders fan my bar for bad ownership is so low I often forget that the Orioles could have much better ownership?  At least the Orioles have brought in a competent FO and seem to be letting them do SOME things right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

Well the one thing that's openly obvious, the money being spent on the major league team is judicious at best. Their $48,841,666 projected payroll for 2023 is 28th of 20 teams. not exactly a liftoff.

I'm just going to remain as consistent as possible on my feelings on ownership. Whether it's Peter, Georgia, John or Lou running things it's still an Angelos. As long as it's an Angelos running things the organization will be run on a shoe-string budget until it's sold. 

There will be no "lift-offs" or trading for big salaries like they did in Houston to take that next step. 

The number one goal for every Orioles fan should be that this team is sold to an owner that will actually want to pay for a 1st class product that Orioles fans deserve.

They hired the right guy to rebuild the franchise from within with Elias, but I don't believe he's been given the funds to take that next step and he won't as long as the Angelos family drama continues as owners of this franchise.

 

Does John Angelos really want to sell? He makes a nice profit on MASN and the Orioles Who knows what happens with the law firm. When he signs the new lease ,he will some nice money from the state to fix up Camden Yards. He will be able to have more concerts,etc. I don't think he wants to work for his wife's record label. Not sure he could be a country star.

Also Thomas Kelso, the head of the Maryland Stadium Authority is going to be replaced by the new governor.Probably doesn't matter to the lease negotiations because they are supposedly getting closer to a deal 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Going Underground said:

Does John Angelos really want to sell? He makes a nice profit on MASN and the Orioles Who knows what happens with the law firm. When he signs the new lease ,he will some nice money from the state to fix up Camden Yards. He will be able to have more concerts,etc. I don't think he wants to work for his wife's record label. Not sure he could be a country star.

Also Thomas Kelso, the head of the Maryland Stadium Authority is going to be replaced by the new governor.Probably doesn't matter to the lease negotiations because they are supposedly getting closer to a deal 

It's a great question. From all indications the Orioles are very profitable whether they win or lose as long as they keep the salaries down which is what they've done. 

I don't personally think John cares whether the team wins of loses as long as it suits his ability to feel important and make money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, AnythingO's said:

I wonder if there is any way to determine if that $10 M figure includes the current $5 M "pledge" to College Bound?????

Screwed this up earlier. I was trying to say that I'm pretty sure the CollegeBound pledge isn't included in the $10 million since the website says $10 million is the amount donated to charities and the Orioles haven't donated anything to CollegeBound yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Going Underground said:

Does John Angelos really want to sell? He makes a nice profit on MASN and the Orioles Who knows what happens with the law firm. When he signs the new lease ,he will some nice money from the state to fix up Camden Yards. He will be able to have more concerts,etc. I don't think he wants to work for his wife's record label. Not sure he could be a country star.

Also Thomas Kelso, the head of the Maryland Stadium Authority is going to be replaced by the new governor.Probably doesn't matter to the lease negotiations because they are supposedly getting closer to a deal 

I don't know what John wants, but I don't think it matters what he wants. How is Peter Angelos's estate going to pay the federal estate taxes due on the value of, let's say 67 percent of the value of the Orioles? Those taxes will be in the neighborhood of $500 million. Whether or not John and his mother have been robbing peter to pay themselves, there's not cash like that sitting around, no other source of substantial income that we know about (the law firm used to generate income for Peter but doesn't any longer. There's MASN, but its future income to the Orioles (and hence its value) are uncertain.

I can't understand why anyone thinks MLB would approve John, or even more so John and Lou, as the new majority owners: they carry with them the legacy of Peter Angelos's  obstreperous and unsuccessful ownership, even before Peter dies, John and Lou are fighting over who will be entitled to what from his estate, there will be no majority owner of the team unless Lou gets eliminated (more lawsuits) or is bought out by John (more financial strain on John), they have continued suing MLB in a lawsuit that drives the Commissioner nuts, their politics (John's anyway) are completely at odds with that of most MLB owners, they carried tanking to such an extreme that MLB had to change the rules, they will have to operate on the cheap forever to keep the team going after the payment of estate taxes (if that's even possible), they have no outside source of income, they will be unable to survive a revenue downturn, and ownership by John or both brothers will run the risk of MLB's nightmare: a bankruptcy of the tea, in which MLB loses its right to veto new ownership. 

I believe that in 2020 the Angeloses made a deal with MLB that permits Georgia to run things until Peter dies rather than force a sale now (and much greater tax obligations) and obligates the Angeloses to sell upon Peter's death. As I'll explain when I get some time to lay it out, I can't find another way to explain what's happened between MLB and the Angeloses.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it was Louis that said John wants the family to maintain controlling interest in the O's and didn't John stop the sale being driven by Georgia a while ago? If that assumption is right, then wouldn't the shares go to Georgia when PA passes? Does a spousal transfer delay the inheritance tax issue? If so, wouldn't that allow JA to continue to "suit his ability to make money and feel important"? I know that flies in the face of your belief that there is an agreement to sell with MLB after PA passes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

I believe that in 2020 the Angeloses made a deal with MLB that permits Georgia to run things until Peter dies rather than force a sale now (and much greater tax obligations) and obligates the Angeloses to sell upon Peter's death. As I'll explain when I get some time to lay it out, I can't find another way to explain what's happened between MLB and the Angeloses.

I don't recall any obligation or requirement for Mrs. Angelos to sell the team imposed by MLB.  Now, if you mean that a potential tax obligation may required John and Lou to sell upon her death, that's a different matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Agreed, they were trying to preserve Burnes there. The division still hadn't been clinched, so try to win the game but within the rest management plan for your ace. Hopefully the fact they used Cano means there aren't any major concerns about his rest, but now you have to wonder.
    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...