Jump to content

John Angelos chews out Dan Connolly


interloper

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

So the only reason there was anything being announced at all was because of the Orioles donating fan generated revenue so Angelos acting like he was being accosted at mass was just his play at PR management .. which he failed. 

He made sure all the money came from Yankee and Red Sox fans.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

How long have Tampa and Oakland been trying to move?

They voted (28-2) to contract the Twins and Expos before allowing the Expos to move.

Neither has been trying to move. Both, especially Oakland, have talked about -- or threatened, depending on your point of view -- to move if they don't get a new ballpark. That's been going on for at least ten years, maybe fifteen, at my guess.

MLB has been clear that no other teams can relocate until the Oakland and TB situations are resolved, and while I don't believe anything's been said it's pretty clear that if they don't get new ballparks Oakland's and/or TB's request to move will be approved. That approval would support what MLB has been telling cities and counties with teams as well as potential relocation sites: if you want to keep or get an MLB team, you better be prepared to pay a big chunk of the cost of a new ballpark. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

Can't wait for how Angelos avoids questions next week. I'm predicting a vague presentation with fewto no questions answered.  How long until the O's get a real owner.

 

It doesn't go to your point, but John Angelos is not the owner. He's in charge of the team because his mother -- also not the real owner, who apparently knows and cares not a whit about the Orioles or about baseball -- wants him to be the guy in charge. 

This is what I would call an unsustainable ownership structure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

“Hey, this isn’t really the appropriate forum for this. Let me give you a quick answer and we can pick up any additional questions at a later date. Blah blah blah, things are wonderful and the orioles are staying here for as long as my family owns the majority stake and control, blah blah blah. Want to win championships year after year. Blah blah blah. 
Back to the topic at hand and our families commitment to the community and the continuing spirit of MLKs dream for this country and people. 
 

That was easy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Yardball85 said:

He spent a lot on the 96 and 97 teams, and they were awesome... it didn't not work out, per se.  He spent wisely on Alomar, Palmeiro, etc. 

He also started negotiating directly with Boras, developed relationships with favorite players, etc. I think the Cohen scene with the Mets could easily blow up in a few years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, HakunaSakata said:

I mean, the bar has been set pretty low after these last few mayoral terms. Say what you will about Mayor Scott, at least he hasn't been convicted/sentenced to jail time!

That's a low bar. I am not a great mayor but never convicted. Good campaign slogan .

Have you ever heard Mayor Scott  get questions from WBFF? Probably worse then this exchange  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Probably.  To be clear, it’s the Orioles making the donation, not John Angelos, who by the way isn’t a lawyer (though he did graduate law school).   

For those who didn’t bother to watch the press conference, the Mayor himself benefitted from the College Bound program when he was a student, and he’s on the board of the organization.   So it’s not some random program from his standpoint.  

Some of the bigger  law firms in the area have people on the board.

Frobby ???

Board of Directors | CollegeBound Foundation
https://www.collegeboundfoundation.org/about-us/board-directors/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

You don't want to send the Nats back to Montreal?

Might as well, but MASN retains tv rights just to stick it to them. Those owners made out like bandits on purchase price and soon to be sale price.

And all of their players get taxed at the highest Canadian rate and are paid in only Looneys and Twoneys. Or however they spell them. 

Edited by sevastras
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

One thing John was right about: nobody knows how much of the Orioles is owned by Peter, John and Lou Angelos. The 70 percent John mentioned is lower than the guesses and estimates I've seen.

I don’t think John and Lou own any.  John mentioned that the owners are Peter and Georgia.  I assume Georgia’s is either as joint owner with Peter, or as Peter’s attorney-in-fact.  I’d thought the family was closer to 80%, but “over 70%” is close enough.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was a nice thing for the Orioles to do but I really think Cal Perry needs to get Angelos some serious media training.  You can see him blinking uncontrollably during the initial question and then after taking the bait turn so condescending.  Now he's invited the media in to look at the books-I really can't help but flashback to the famous scene in A Few Good Men, when Colonel Jessup blows up on the stand!!

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Frobby said:

I don’t think John and Lou own any.  John mentioned that the owners are Peter and Georgia.  I assume Georgia’s is either as joint owner with Peter, or as Peter’s attorney-in-fact.  I’d thought the family was closer to 80%, but “over 70%” is close enough.   

John and Lou are listed among the limited partners on the Orioles' website.  https://www.mlb.com/orioles/team/front-office 

Of course, we'll soon know the details about who owns what, courtesy of the transparent John Angelos.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Agreed, they were trying to preserve Burnes there. The division still hadn't been clinched, so try to win the game but within the rest management plan for your ace. Hopefully the fact they used Cano means there aren't any major concerns about his rest, but now you have to wonder.
    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...