Jump to content

Roch's Latest... Speculation about Dunn?


Nick The Stick

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 158
  • Created
  • Last Reply
But, Dunn has played all of his career on NL teams. Given him the chance to play less LF and more DH don't you think he won't commit as much errors?
He's still the same awfulness out there for every play he's out there. Errors are secondary in this discussion, btw. He's bad because of the balls he doesn't get to that everyone else gets to easily much moreso than the balls he gets to and botches.

Of course he'll cumulatively be less costly out there if he plays out there a lot less. The problem is he doesn't want to play out there a lot less. He's insisting on being a regular LF. That's no good.

A couple games here and there isn't a problem. But counting on him for 1/2 a season's worth of games in the field is a bad plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, if they keep track of how the ball is hit and where it goes, and if Nick gets to less of them than somebody else, then how does our observation of (and preference for) Nick provide better information?
I doubt the consistency of the measurements across the board.

Someone has to decide if a ball is a line drive or a fly ball. Or if it goes 20 feet from the foul line or 30 feet. Someone has to keep track of where Markakis is positioned every play.

Until they essentially have a timer on every ball that is hit, from when it hits the bat, to when it hits the ground, to when the fielder gets to it, and exactly how far both the ball and fielder traveled, and (for infield) how long it takes to throw and if the throw was clean or scooped, there are always going to be inconsistencies with defensive stats. I just feel that the Fielding Bible has more of these inconsistencies with what I think is right than some other rating systems I've seen out there. Its obviously far better than nothing, but not good enough for me to consider it gospel (pun intended!). I still factor in my own opinions when I feel I have enough justification to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt the consistency of the measurements across the board.

Someone has to decide if a ball is a line drive or a fly ball.

Or if it goes 20 feet from the foul line or 30 feet.

I believe they have automated aids that help govern that.

It's not like, "Oh, well, I sorta feel like that ball is 20 feet from the line".

Someone has to keep track of where Markakis is positioned every play.

No they don't. Doesn't matter where he stands. The only thing that matters is what he gets to vs. what he doesn't.

Where he stands is up to him. It has no effect on their scoring. For each ball hit to RF-World, either he gets it or he doesn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No they don't. Doesn't matter where he stands. The only thing that matters is what he gets to vs. what he doesn't.

Where he stands is up to him. It has no effect on their scoring. For each ball hit to RF-World, either he gets it or he doesn't.

Yes they do, because different teams have their players stand in different places. I'm not saying Trembley is out there waiving Markakis around, but they have an idea of how to play each opposing hitter. Its not Markakis' fault if the team is playing Nick Punto shallow and he happens to hit one that lands 20 feet in front of the warning track.

Just as Brian Roberts shouldn't get extra credit for fielding a ground ball 30 feet deep into RF and throwing out David Ortiz.

This stuff probably all comes close to evening out over the course of the season, but maybe it doesn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes they do, because different teams have their players stand in different places. I'm not saying Trembley is out there waiving Markakis around, but they have an idea of how to play each opposing hitter. Its not Markakis' fault if the team is playing Nick Punto shallow and he happens to hit one that lands 20 feet in front of the warning track.

Just as Brian Roberts shouldn't get extra credit for fielding a ground ball 30 feet deep into RF and throwing out David Ortiz.

This stuff probably all comes close to evening out over the course of the season, but maybe it doesn't.

I'm not saying that positioning doesn't matter.

Of course it matters. It helps determine which balls you get to vs. which ones you don't.

But it doesn't matter in their scoring, and I agree with them that it should not.

All that matters is which plays get made vs. which ones don't. Then it all comes out in the wash.

So, if BRob stands in the right place and gets a guy out when other 2B-men don't, that's a + play.

But what matters is that he made the play, they don't care where he was standing.

Players and teams could learn something about how effective their positioning is by studying the detailed results of this scheme.

We don't get to see the details, but I bet the teams pay to see them.

How else could the guy make money doing this? It's v. labor intensive, he's gotta make a buck somehow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes they do, because different teams have their players stand in different places. I'm not saying Trembley is out there waiving Markakis around, but they have an idea of how to play each opposing hitter. Its not Markakis' fault if the team is playing Nick Punto shallow and he happens to hit one that lands 20 feet in front of the warning track.

Just as Brian Roberts shouldn't get extra credit for fielding a ground ball 30 feet deep into RF and throwing out David Ortiz.

This stuff probably all comes close to evening out over the course of the season, but maybe it doesn't.

The positioning thing can help as much as it can hurt. Look at Miggi e.g. He still ranks high as a SS because he plays back and in the hole and relies on his strong arm to make plays. He gets to more balls in the hole than almost any other SS. This out weighs the number of slow hit balls he doesn't make plays on, or the number of balls up the middle he doesn't reach. Or Cal as another example. I do agree that the categorizing of hard hit balls, slow hit balls, line drives, and fly balls, leaves cracks for plays and players to fall through, but by and large I think it is the best system going. Be interested in hearing what some of the other stat people think.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But it doesn't matter in their scoring, and I agree with them that it should not.

All that matters is which plays get made vs. which ones don't. Then it all comes out in the wash.

So, if BRob stands in the right place and gets a guy out when other 2B don't, that's a + play.

But what matters is that he made the play, they don't care where he was standing.

I disagree with this completely.

Positioning is as much a function of the team's manager as it is of each player. The best fielders are the ones with the most range, the surest hands, and the best arms. If one of their managers has the RF stand on the foul line, it doesn't mean he's a crappy RF, just that his manager is being ridiculous. I think a lot of the positioning things will even out, but not all of them. It should be taken into account.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • emmett16 is right. Uppercut swings produce a lot of groundouts because the bat is not on the same plane as the ball for very long. The best swing stays on the same plane as the ball for a longer time. This will produce contact that creates backspin on the ball which makes it carry. That Ted Williams book is one of the best hitting books ever written.
    • I have to admit. I'm an addict. I'm an addict not of booze or drugs. I'm an addict for baseball .... It's still THE game for me and I love almost any team sport. But for me, when it's great, it's still the greatest game of them all. I hate to say it, but when my team wins ...it's like a hit of crack or coke and I have never and will never try those drugs. This one is a better high anyway. It's an adrenaline rush for me. It comes from my heart and soul. Like the other night in Anaheim I sat transfixed on the game. I dont need to look at the silly shell games on a scoreboard, nor hear what the players favorite singer is.. or eat a lot of junk, but I DO have to have my bag of peanuts. The Orioles were clinging to a one run lead, when, with the bases loaded, Mike Trout stepped up to the plate...a single and the game is tied...an extra base hit and the Orioles lose. Our pitcher Craig Kimbrel had to throw a strike to one of the all time greats, and somehow, someway, Trout looked at a third strike and the Orioles won. I lept into the air as if I had a million dollars on the game. I never bet on sports, but this was a better high than winning any bet anyway. Because it is pure and it comes from my deep place of caring when the 'Birds' win. Today in Anaheim, another nail biter, the game was in the ninth with two out and a runner on first. Suddenly the runner broke for second and catcher James McCann threw a strike to second base. Gunnar Henderson covering, made the tag and the ump called the runner out. And the game ended that way. Bang Bang. Personally I thought it was a blown call, but after review the call was upheld and the Orioles won another nail biter. I dont watch many other games, but every night I hit the crack pipe" of baseball. It's my addiction. I also love watching fantastic performers. Mookie Betts is an electric ballplayer . can do anything at the plate and in the field. The Orioles' Henderson is a must see ballplayer like Betts is. On Wednesday he hit a home run, a double, a single, drove in 3 runs got hit by a pitch , stole a base and made two game saving plays in the field. Baseball is a team sport but it's also watching the brilliant, mesmerizing individual performances. It's watching the best players in the world do what I think is the most difficult thing in sports , hit a baseball, throw a baseball, and field a baseball. It's hard to do. Anyway,it's still just April and it's a long, long season. Bryant Gumble once had a great line about the difference between football and baseball. He said "Baseball, is a never ending romance, but football is a one night stand." Yep, I'm an addict, a baseball junkie, and I make no apologies for it. I'll never go to rehab for my baseball addiction. I don't NEED to be cured. And I never will be. Jim Bouton said it best in "Ball Four" his great book. "In all the years you grip a baseball...you suddenly remember, it's really the other way around" Exactly.
    • Especially when you factor in the DL Hall trade too.  Suarez and Wells get bumped to the pen only if Bradish and Means are effective starters a decent part of the season.  Would the O's promote Povich or McDermott to pitch relief?  My guess is not anytime soon, but I dunno. A trade would for one or two arms would be best, but trading for good relief pitching is only harder now because so many teams can make the playoffs.  
    • But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield.  If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.   Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  
    • Wait, since when is money no object? It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in.  The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum.
    • I think you have a good understanding and I assume you’ve read Ted Williams Science of Hitting.  It’s all about lining up planes of pitch and bat.  Historically with sinkers and low strikes a higher attack angle played and was more in alignment with pitch plane.  In today’s game of spin and high zone fastball an uppercut swing gives you minimal chance and results in top spin grounders and swing & miss. 
    • I'll bow to your expertise even if it seems unlikely to my laymen understanding. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...