Jump to content

Ryan Mountcastle 2023


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, banks703 said:

To keep this going for RM. Since the break he's now:

 

29/71 good for .409 BA with 7 2B, 4 HR, 14 RBI, 9 BB to 19 Ks

 

He's been a little more strikeout happy the last six games counting today (8 Ks in that span) but he's also walked three times and had nine hits. He may be reverting back to pull-happy Ryan, which we have to expect some but if he can fight off those tendencies and continue to stay true to the middle of the field, I think we've got this version of him that everyone salivated over during his years in the minors. It's still a relatively small sample size but I continue to like what we're seeing from him (approach-wise, not the numbers, obviously we all like the numbers). 

And at least 2 of those Ks were called strike threes with full counts on bad calls.  It could very easily be 6K and 5BB.  Regardless, good-Mounty is a beast and I hope he keeps it going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, jdwilde1 said:

And at least 2 of those Ks were called strike threes with full counts on bad calls.  It could very easily be 6K and 5BB.  Regardless, good-Mounty is a beast and I hope he keeps it going.

I’m really liking his swing decisions. He’s been more selective (though I’m not sure that the pitches per plate appearance suggest that). It just seems like he’s seeing the ball really well and he’s swinging at HIS pitch.

The league will adjust to how they pitch him at some point but with a warm Adley, Gunnar and Ant continuing to do their Gunnar and Ant things, ROH remaining productive, Westburg and Urias contributing and hopefully a healthy Ced, there continues to be no glaring hole in their lineup. Frazier and McCann have grown increasingly more productive these recent weeks. It’s going to be tough for opposing pitchers to consistently beat all nine guys in their lineup day in and day out. Pitchers are going to have to choose whether to pitch to RM with Adley on base OR pitch around him to get to Gunnar, Ant, ROH, Hays, etc etc. I expect RM to continue to rake if he stays with this approach, especially if he’s to preceded in the lineup by Adley and followed by Gunnar and Ant. It’s unconventional to lead off your catcher but damn if it isn’t working and helping Ryan to get pitches to hit. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ryan walked 12 times his first 60 games this year.  In 25 games since he has come back from vertigo he has walked 11 times.  Not a definitive trend yet but it is a good sign.  If he continues to swing at strikes he will be a much more dangerous hitter.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ChosenOne21 said:

If he keeps up this trend of being more selective, yeah, he'll be special. But we've been down this road before, so I wouldn't bet on it lasting.

Not so. He’s never demonstrated this selectiveness, not even during his minor league career.

There is always the potential for regression to the mean so I’m not ready to declare that he has “fixed” himself but he’s showing a very clear difference in how he is attacking pitches since he came off of the IL. I don’t expect him to hit .400 with a 1/2 BB/K but if he can maintain this approach, he’s going to be a difference maker. I’ve stated multiple times that, to me, this has been his best stretch of hitting during his professional career. I’ll happily take less homers from him if it means more doubles, more hits to right field, more walks and more pitches per plate appearance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look at the BB below.  Down and/or away is exactly how you got him out many times over the last two years.  It looks to me like he's moved a little closer to the plate and it's clear his approach is to work away.  Those things are obviously related.  I'm sure he's worked on pitch recognition, both type and location.  Here, he swung at the first pitch and took the next five.  If he can continue laying off the outside stuff and working right-center, a BIG IF for sure, he's going to have a nice career because his hands are power are elite.

image.png.e3d772515f1643d6a9c63df0649f2ea5.png 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, clapdiddy said:

Is it just me, or does his stance look a little different than before the time on the IL?

Nope, not just you. I've pointed it out a few times. He's not as tall/straight upright and stiff, his front leg/foot are not as pronounced and he's inched a little bit closer to the plate while opening up just a skosh.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, banks703 said:

Not so. He’s never demonstrated this selectiveness, not even during his minor league career.

There is always the potential for regression to the mean so I’m not ready to declare that he has “fixed” himself but he’s showing a very clear difference in how he is attacking pitches since he came off of the IL. I don’t expect him to hit .400 with a 1/2 BB/K but if he can maintain this approach, he’s going to be a difference maker. I’ve stated multiple times that, to me, this has been his best stretch of hitting during his professional career. I’ll happily take less homers from him if it means more doubles, more hits to right field, more walks and more pitches per plate appearance. 

I have no idea how to look this up, but I'd be surprised if he hasn't been this selective over 50 PAs somewhere in his career.

1 hour ago, Ripken said:

Look at the BB below.  Down and/or away is exactly how you got him out many times over the last two years.  It looks to me like he's moved a little closer to the plate and it's clear his approach is to work away.  Those things are obviously related.  I'm sure he's worked on pitch recognition, both type and location.  Here, he swung at the first pitch and took the next five.  If he can continue laying off the outside stuff and working right-center, a BIG IF for sure, he's going to have a nice career because his hands are power are elite. 

I wouldn't give him too much credit. Four of those were nowhere close, and yes, while he's swung at pitches like that before, I'm not ready to call him Joey Votto yet either.

I would love nothing more than for Ryan Mountcastle to hit like this forever, but he's got a track record of looking good for a month before becoming, well, Ryan Mountcastle again. I'll start hoping and getting a little excited if he does this for the rest of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sanity Check said:

How the times have changed after so many thought Elias was crazy bringing Mountcastle up after struggling to hit AAA pitching.   Seems maybe Elias wasn't crazy....

Well, the Orioles didn't tell us anything about his vertigo even though he was apparently playing with it for some time. I can buy into him hitting to his career norms, maybe better if he can improve incrementally his plate discipline. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Any jerk wad want to congratulate Duke Basketball or the Steelers? just go ahead and piss me off even more 
    • Agreed, they were trying to preserve Burnes there. The division still hadn't been clinched, so try to win the game but within the rest management plan for your ace. Hopefully the fact they used Cano means there aren't any major concerns about his rest, but now you have to wonder.
    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...