Jump to content

Orioles Acquire LHP Cole Irvin from the A's for Darrel Hernaiz


LTO's

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, now said:

Jake Rill begs to differ:

While Irvin and Gibson will be locks for the Orioles’ rotation, the battles for the final three spots have tightened. Dean Kremer, Kyle Bradish and Tyler Wells all pitched well at times last year and will be favorites in the mix, while Grayson Rodriguez, the club’s top pitching prospect, has a high chance of earning a rotation spot in Spring Training.

Austin Voth, DL Hall, Mike Baumann and Bruce Zimmermann are also starting candidates. Those who don’t make the rotation will either pitch out of Baltimore’s bullpen or start for Triple-A Norfolk to open 2023.

Yikes, this really changes our previous in-house outlook. Grayson no longer a lock, with Wells ahead of him by this account. Voth and Hall banished for now. Of course, things always change due to injuries, etc. So what we fantasize as a 5-man rotation really means 9-10 arms in the mix, as the season progresses. BTW John Means says hi, too.

https://www.mlb.com/news/cole-irvin-orioles-trade

Anyone can have an opinion.   I don't think he is right.  Irvin has a chance but he is far from a lock.   ST will tell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, now said:

Jake Rill begs to differ:

While Irvin and Gibson will be locks for the Orioles’ rotation, the battles for the final three spots have tightened. Dean Kremer, Kyle Bradish and Tyler Wells all pitched well at times last year and will be favorites in the mix, while Grayson Rodriguez, the club’s top pitching prospect, has a high chance of earning a rotation spot in Spring Training.

Austin Voth, DL Hall, Mike Baumann and Bruce Zimmermann are also starting candidates. Those who don’t make the rotation will either pitch out of Baltimore’s bullpen or start for Triple-A Norfolk to open 2023.

Yikes, this really changes our previous in-house outlook. Grayson no longer a lock, with Wells ahead of him by this account. Voth and Hall banished for now. Of course, things always change due to injuries, etc. So what we fantasize as a 5-man rotation really means 9-10 arms in the mix, as the season progresses. BTW John Means says hi, too.

https://www.mlb.com/news/cole-irvin-orioles-trade

I could see the keep him down and then turn to a 6 man rotation to "limit his innings"....ie, make sure he doesn't win the ROY until the following year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Anyone can have an opinion.   I don't think he is right.  Irvin has a chance but he is far from a lock.   ST will tell.

Let's put it this way.  Irvin would have to be awful to lose a spot and I'm not sure that would do it.   I'd call it a lock.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't think picking up a below average pitcher is something that can be called a strong move.

It's a move. 

His results have actually been slightly above average for SPs the last two years. 

In 2021 the league ERA for starting pitchers was 4.34 and Irvin had a 4.24 in 32 starts. Last year the league ERA for starting pitchers was 4.05 and Irvin had a 3.98 ERA in 30 starts.

Average-ish starting pitchers who can stay healthy all year aren't too easy to find. We got one and only gave up a prospect who was going to have a hard time impacting our MLB roster at any point. Irvin isn't some huge upgrade but that's a strong move to me in terms of what we gave up and got in return.

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One side effect of this trade is that it reduces the odds that DL Hall makes the opening day roster.  If the O's still want to give him a chance to make it as a starter (which I think is the right decision), then he will need to spend more time working at AAA on his command (also I think the right decision).  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

In 2021 his ERA+ was 97.

In 2022 his ERA+ was 94.

I stand by my earlier statement.

I agree with the abstract statement he's a below average pitcher. (The peripherals agree with that as well.) Just pointing out that he's actually been slightly better than the average SP the last two years, while also producing an above average volume. Calling him a below average pitcher as the blanket analysis obscures that a bit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Three Run Homer said:

One side effect of this trade is that it reduces the odds that DL Hall makes the opening day roster.  If the O's still want to give him a chance to make it as a starter (which I think is the right decision), then he will need to spend more time working at AAA on his command (also I think the right decision).  

Hall and the Rule 5 guy probably see the biggest decrease in their odds. 

I noticed Fangraphs booted Grayson from their projected OD roster. I really don't think the O's will be that dumb but after last summer I also don't want to assume anything until I see him on the mound in the majors. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Spy Fox said:

I agree with the abstract statement he's a below average pitcher. (The peripherals agree with that as well.) Just pointing out that he's actually been slightly better than the average SP the last two years, while also producing an above average volume. Calling him a below average pitcher as the blanket analysis obscures that a bit. 

Considering roster construction and pitcher usage I don't give much value to the volume of innings pitched.

For the record I'm not saying he's awful, but this isn't a "strong move".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Spy Fox said:

Hall and the Rule 5 guy probably see the biggest decrease in their odds. 

I noticed Fangraphs booted Grayson from their projected OD roster. I really don't think the O's will be that dumb but after last summer I also don't want to assume anything until I see him on the mound in the majors. 

Elias likes that extra year of team control.

I can see him trying for it since he's already decided that he isn't going to make a real push for the playoffs.

What are the odds he finishes high in RoY voting?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Let's put it this way.  Irvin would have to be awful to lose a spot and I'm not sure that would do it.   I'd call it a lock.   

This will not be about experience or who can pitch the most innings.   This will be about who is the best pitcher.    Irvin only pitched well in tha big park at home.   Put him against the starters in camp and he comes up 6th or 7th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Per Roch:   For the Orioles Gunnar Henderson SS Jordan Westburg 2B Anthony Santander RF Colton Cowser LF Adley Rutschman C Ryan O’Hearn DH Ryan Mountcastle 1B Cedric Mullins CF Ramón Urías 3B Cade Povich LHP For the Twins Manuel Margot RF Carlos Correa SS Byron Buxton CF Carlos Santana 1B Royce Lewis 3B Kyle Farmer 2B Ryan Jeffers DH Christian Vázquez C Willi Castro LF Pablo López RHP    
    • That would be pretty cool. Just do me a favor and please don't start the magic number thread in June next season.
    • There’s another accomplishment from 1983 I’d like to match.  
    • I'm more of a Prime Number guy, I'm happy enough with 89. Round numbers are for suckers.   Pretty disheartening they haven't managed to reach that relatively meager goal in 40 years.
    • Still with a chance to do this for the first time since 1982-83. Would be one more nice accomplishment for this organization. 
    • The weird thing about our bullpen is that they rarely blow leads.   They have a 69% save rate, 4th highest in baseball.  They make it scary, but generally, when they have the lead, they get the job done.   Where they are really bad is keeping games close when we’re down a run or two, last night being a classic example of that.   This year’s team has 32 comeback wins, compared to 48 last year.   Why is that?   Part of it is obviously on the offense, but part of it is that the bullpen doesn’t keep us in striking distance when we’re behind.   One way you can tell this is by the W/L records of the starters and the bullpen.  Last year, the starters were 57-40, this year they’re 60-49.   The starter got the decision 12 more times this year than last year, including 9 more losses (with 3 games to play).   That tells you that when the team is losing when the starter is pulled, they keep losing.  Meanwhile, the relievers were 44-21 last year, 28-22 now. They’re not picking up wins because they don’t give the offense a chance to catch up and get the win for the bullpen guy.    
    • I do not disagree with above posts.  Also I am pretty sure that this time last season, the Texas Rangers Hangout was saying the exact same things as the Rangers Pen.  Point being, you never know until you know.  The pen is shaky, but is capable of putting together a solid run from time to time.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...