Jump to content

Orioles Acquire LHP Cole Irvin from the A's for Darrel Hernaiz


LTO's

Recommended Posts

I see Irvin as the O's 7th best starter to begin the season.    Gibson, Kremer, Bradish, Grayson, Wells and Voth are all better IMO.   Camden Yards is not the Coliseum where Irvin did his best pitching in a large park.   And the 2021-22 AL West didn't have nearly as many good teams as he would see in the 2023 AL East.   Holt will help Irvin but that does not mean he will be better than the 6 starters ahead of him.

I am not saying this is a bad trade.  It offers pitching depth in case of injury and non performance.  Gibson, Kremer and Bradish all project for about 30 starts.   Grayson and Wells don't.  But Voth, Means and Hall  can fill those starts later in the season.  And those three are all better than Irvin.

I can see Holt making adjustment to Irvin's pitches and pitch mix in ST.  Irvin could beginning the season in AAA (he has an option) or as a long man in the pen.   How he adjusts will tell how many innings he gets in the majors IMO.

Edited by wildcard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I see Irvin as the O's 7th best starter to begin the season.    Gibson, Kremer, Bradish, Grayson, Wells and Voth are all better IMO.   Camden Yards is not the Coliseum where Irvin did his best pitching in a large park.   And the 2021-22 AL West didn't have nearly as many good teams as he would see in the 2023 AL East.   Holt will help Irvin but that does not mean he will be better than the 6 starters ahead of him.

I am not saying this is a bad trade.  It offers pitching depth in case of injury and non performance.  Gibson, Kremer and Bradish all project for about 30 starts.   Grayson and Wells don't.  But Voth, Means and Hall  can fill those starts later in the season.  And those three are all better than Irvin.

I can see Holt making adjustment to Irvin's pitches and pitch mix in ST.  Irvin could beginning the season in AAA (he has an option) or as a long man in the pen.   How he adjusts will tell how many innings he gets in the majors IMO.

He's in the OD starting rotation.  Believing anything else is a delusion.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I see Irvin as the O's 7th best starter to begin the season.    Gibson, Kremer, Bradish, Grayson, Wells and Voth are all better IMO.   Camden Yards is not the Coliseum where Irvin did his best pitching in a large park.   And the 2021-22 AL West didn't have nearly as many good teams as he would see in the 2023 AL East.   Holt will help Irvin but that does not mean he will be better than the 6 starters ahead of him.

I am not saying this is a bad trade.  It offers pitching depth in case of injury and non performance.  Gibson, Kremer and Bradish all project for about 30 starts.   Grayson and Wells don't.  But Voth, Means and Hall  can fill those starts later in the season.  And those three are all better than Irvin.

I can see Holt making adjustment to Irvin's pitches and pitch mix in ST.  Irvin could beginning the season in AAA (he has an option) or as a long man in the pen.   How he adjusts will tell how many innings he gets in the majors IMO.

 

Grayson hasn't pitched an inning in the majors

Wells numbers were much better out of the pen as a rookie, so he probably helps the team more in that role.

Voth was solid for us last season, but averaged under 5 innings per start, Irvin averaged over 6 innings

Edited by DirtyBird
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I see Irvin as the O's 7th best starter to begin the season.    Gibson, Kremer, Bradish, Grayson, Wells and Voth are all better IMO.   Camden Yards is not the Coliseum where Irvin did his best pitching in a large park.   And the 2021-22 AL West didn't have nearly as many good teams as he would see in the 2023 AL East.   Holt will help Irvin but that does not mean he will be better than the 6 starters ahead of him.

I am not saying this is a bad trade.  It offers pitching depth in case of injury and non performance.  Gibson, Kremer and Bradish all project for about 30 starts.   Grayson and Wells don't.  But Voth, Means and Hall  can fill those starts later in the season.  And those three are all better than Irvin.

I can see Holt making adjustment to Irvin's pitches and pitch mix in ST.  Irvin could beginning the season in AAA (he has an option) or as a long man in the pen.   How he adjusts will tell how many innings he gets in the majors IMO.

I don’t get why some think he will be a swing man yet Gibson is our Opening Day starter. Last year Irvin beat out Gibson in IP, H9, BB9, and HR9…He is an innings eater and the only real left handed option until Means comes back or Hall figures out what a strike zone is. 
 

The home/away splits are a bit concerning, but luckily he’ll play half his games with a wall in left that is only rivaled by the Wall of Westeros. He got lefties out at a respectable rate and the biggest difference in his splits came from righties slugging at a higher rate…which will likely come down playing at Camden Yards. 
 

A more balanced schedule in 2023 means less starts vs the AL East juggernauts. And Wells and Voth are definitely not going to be eating innings like Irvin would. I just think there’s a lot to like (but nothing to love) about the move.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pickles said:

He's in the OD starting rotation.  Believing anything else is a delusion.

Why? Because he is a better pitcher than the other 6 starters I mentioned?   I don't think so.   Because of his salary?  He makes the minimum.    Because of his experience?  He has very little  experience pitching in the AL East.

In ST he is going to have to show he is one the 5 best starters on the team.   I don't think he will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Why? Because he is a better pitcher than the other 6 starters I mentioned?   I don't think so.   Because of his salary?  He makes the minimum.    Because of his experience?  He has very little  experience pitching in the AL East.

In ST he is going to have to show he is one the 5 best starters on the team.   I don't think he will.

Obviously Elias is looking at more things than just which six are the better pitchers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Why? Because he is a better pitcher than the other 6 starters I mentioned?   I don't think so.   Because of his salary?  He makes the minimum.    Because of his experience?  He has very little  experience pitching in the AL East.

In ST he is going to have to show he is one the 5 best starters on the team.   I don't think he will.

Quite honestly, you should have been saying the same thing about Gibson, yet you included him in your "better pitchers" list.  Despite his splits, he's still a better pitcher than Gibson.  He's thrown over 350 innings over the last 2 years, so he has the ability to go deep into games and keep his team in the game. 

Kremer and Bradish, while promising, are still an unknown quantity.  GRod hasn't thrown 1 inning in the majors.   Voth has thrown over 100 innings in a season exactly once. 

Adding Irvin give them a solid back of the rotation guy that will keep the team in games and give them innings. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

 

Grayson hasn't pitched an inning in the majors

Wells numbers were much better out of the pen as a rookie, so he probably helps the team more in that role.

Voth was solid for us last season, but averaged under 5 innings per start, Irvin averaged over 6 innings

Grayson will probably have the best stuff on any starter in camp.

 The pen has Bautista, Perez, Tate, Baker, Givens, Voth, Akin and a competition between Politi, Krehbiel and Irvin for the last spot.  Wells is probably needed more in the rotation.

Irvin pitched away from the Coliseum to an ERA of 5.26.  He is not pitching in the Coliseum any more.   Voth ERA was 3.04.

It doesn't matter how many innings Irvin can pitch if he can't pitch them well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Grayson will probably have the best stuff on any starter in camp.

 The pen has Bautista, Perez, Tate, Baker, Givens, Voth, Akin and a competition between Politi, Krehbiel and Irvin for the last spot.  Wells is probably needed more in the rotation.

Irvin pitched away from the Coliseum to an ERA of 5.26.  He is not pitching in the Coliseum any more.   Voth ERA was 3.04.

It doesn't matter how many innings Irvin can pitch if he can't pitch them well.

Grayson had the best stuff of any starter in camp last year and got two innings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, clapdiddy said:

Quite honestly, you should have been saying the same thing about Gibson, yet you included him in your "better pitchers" list.  Despite his splits, he's still a better pitcher than Gibson.  He's thrown over 350 innings over the last 2 years, so he has the ability to go deep into games and keep his team in the game. 

Kremer and Bradish, while promising, are still an unknown quantity.  GRod hasn't thrown 1 inning in the majors.   Voth has thrown over 100 innings in a season exactly once. 

Adding Irvin give them a solid back of the rotation guy that will keep the team in games and give them innings. 

Gibson is being paid 10m, has no options and he was an All-Star in 2021 with a 2.87 ERA in Texas.  Pitching in that bandbox in Philly hurt his ERA.

Irvin gives the O'a a solid 7th starter.   Its will take some of the things you are concerned about to come true to get him in the rotation IMO.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, wildcard said:

Gibson is being paid 10m, has no options and he was an All-Star in 2021 with a 2.87 ERA in Texas.  Pitching in that bandbox in Philly hurt his ERA.

Irvin gives the O'a a solid 7th starter.   Its will take some of the things you are concerned about to come true to get him in the rotation IMO.

 

So?

ERA is a flawed stat, why are you even mentioning it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...