Jump to content

Elias hints that more prospect trades could come


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Steve Melewski reported on Mike Elias’ answers to fan Q&A at today’s caravan event.  Here’s a few quotes:

“We are in a mode now where we are really, really focused on winning and trying to increase our chances to get into the playoffs as much as possible," Elias said. "And it is going to start coming more at the expense of the player development side in the minor leagues. We just traded a prospect (Darrell Hernaiz) that we really liked for (A’s pitcher) Cole Irvin. So we’re starting to make those tradeoffs a lot more.”

* * *

“I think we’ve got three great middle infield prospects right now at Triple-A," stated Elias. "Connor Norby, who is primarily a second baseman, Jordan Westburg, who can play really all the spots, and Joey Ortiz, who is like a defensive-wizard kind of shortstop. It’s a great problem to have, to have too many shortstops or too many middle infielders. You can move them all over the diamond, they can play other positions and other teams are always looking, wanting them. That is how we got Cole Irvin, trading from the depth.

“It will sort itself out over the course of the year. … It’s the least of our worries, having too many shortstops and it’s one of the things that is healthiest about our organization right now.”

* * *

Elias was asked if the club could still add a player or another starting pitcher.

“Yeah, we’re still working on stuff," he said. "I can’t predict, there are not a ton of free agents left. Especially premier ones. But it’s very possible that we sign another major league free agent before we head to camp. We also might have moves during camp. In terms of the starting rotation, the thing we feel best about with this group is the numbers, the depth. … We’re going to have nine, 10, 11 starters on our 40-man roster when we go into spring training. I feel that’s a good number to pick from and we’ll keep monitoring opportunities the next few weeks.”

https://www.masnsports.com/blog/hyde-and-elias-take-fan-questions-as-birdland-caravan-kicks-off-at-bel-air-high-school

Edited by Frobby
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Three Run Homer said:

I wish I could believe him when he says that the organization is focused on winning now.  Maybe that's his focus, but it doesn't seem like ownership's focus.  

Elias likely has a very free hand in terms of trading prospects 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Three Run Homer said:

I wish I could believe him when he says that the organization is focused on winning now.  Maybe that's his focus, but it doesn't seem like ownership's focus.  

I have little doubt they have a focus on trying to win.  They are just not going to do it by spending 200 million on a free agent player.  There is an argument to be made that the just spending money approach doesn't guarantee success.  The true measurement will be is when it is time to pay their home grown players or they just choose to sell them off for more prospects.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

So Ortiz is a defensive wizard, eh?  Wonder who's gonna take that quote and run with it.

Sure, I'll bite!  This is why some of us want to see Mateo on the bench and Ortiz playing instead.  A lot of reports have a similar idea, that Ortiz is REALLY good with the glove, so the drop off defensively should be minor.  And Ortiz at least has the potential to be a good bat, while I think that possibility is starting to fade for Mateo.  Outside of an extremely hot 6 week or so period, Mateo was REALLY poor at the plate.  Give Ortiz his chance!  

There, I ran with it!  Happy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At first blush, I took Elias’ first quote as meaning they would look to trade more prospects. That sounds great.

Then, it occurred to me the possibility they shift their asset allocation back to major league salary over minor league development staff and such. That would be awful. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jammer7 said:

At first blush, I took Elias’ first quote as meaning they would look to trade more prospects. That sounds great.

Then, it occurred to me the possibility they shift their asset allocation back to major league salary over minor league development staff and such. That would be awful. 

That would be awful.  It would really cut into ROI.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, forphase1 said:

Sure, I'll bite!  This is why some of us want to see Mateo on the bench and Ortiz playing instead.  A lot of reports have a similar idea, that Ortiz is REALLY good with the glove, so the drop off defensively should be minor.  And Ortiz at least has the potential to be a good bat, while I think that possibility is starting to fade for Mateo.  Outside of an extremely hot 6 week or so period, Mateo was REALLY poor at the plate.  Give Ortiz his chance!  

There, I ran with it!  Happy?

Sure. But you weren’t….nevermind. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joey Potter? Joey “Gandalf” Ortiz? Merlin? If Joey is the Wizard, who is tin man, scarecrow, lion, Toto and Dorothy? Can we now refer to Camden yards as Oz or is that too close to that old HBO show? Can we start calling the trade deadline The Wire? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Helps them win the World Series four out of six years? Ohtani has been with the Angels for five years and they haven't even had a winning season with Ohtani on the team. That includes 2019 when Mike Trout was the AL MVP. Ohtani is a great player and a great story, but thinking one signing will magically bring World Series titles and economic bliss is fool's gold. Arod and the Texas Rangers are an excellent example of how similar justifications were made for the signing, the player performed great, the team included a lot of other star names, and yet the Rangers had losing seasons every year Arod was on the team despite Arod's AL MVP performance in 2003 and he was runner-up to the MVP in 2002. These things don't work out. 
    • With the understanding it’s a pipe dream and won’t happen, in theory, he would be the guy to give $500M to. You are getting a top of the rotation arm and a middle of the order bat all in one.  Your strength is the farm system, so you have cost controlled guys supporting him.  You have a roster advantage, I believe, where you can carry a ninth bullpen guy. (Not sure if there is a caveat here, but it seems like it would be the case.     The rise in Japanese interest in the team would offset the cost more than say getting Soto. I’d absolutely do it.
    • But does best player mean we should go after him? Bringing this back to Frobbys point. That’s the “scary” part to this for me. I’m not sure. I know I would be excited about it, no doubt.  And I know I would want to be there and in that atmosphere.
    • I think you'd have to make the trade with the understanding that you weren't going to be able to resign him, and price that in accordingly.  But, just hypothetically, I would be willing to trade for him with the full understanding he was a rental if the circumstances were favorable.
    • Agreed on all points. I think a more interesting hypothetical would be...if we're in the playoff hunt this year and the Angels are known to be listening to offers on Ohtani for a trade...who do we trade from our system and are we only trading if we have a 48 hour window to sign him to a long term deal?  Or does anyone want to trade a good chunk of our carefully stockpiled system without a long term deal done and run the risk of trying to sign him in free agency? In that scenario, I'd only trade for him if we could hammer out a long term deal before pulling the trigger on that trade.  It'd be tempting to trade for him no matter what but all the Old Bay in the world probably isn't enough to entice him to come back after his time here as a rental is over.  And if that costs us guys like Westburg, Ortiz, Mayo, Norby, Kjerstad,  Povich, etc, count me out.
    • Does Preston present any concrete evidence to support his take that Lamar might be 'coming around?' The last time he said something novel that I recall it was extremely negative about Lamar and his work habits and then he later walked it back.   So I am definitely more skeptical now of Preston.
    • The Orioles don't even have a current payroll of $50M (excluding deferred contracts). And they're going to give him a $50M annual salary?
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...