Jump to content

FG’s Longenhagen top Os prospect list..Cowser at 12!


dzorange

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, emmett16 said:

Freak show!  One of my favorite players all time (mostly due to his commitment to the mustache).  

 

I was just joking about the seasoning (but nevertheless interesting to see his progression the first 6 years).  Man, I wasted like 30 min on his B-Ref page.  What a career.  

One surprising thing I learned reading Yount’s page is that he only made the all-star team three times in his 20-year career.   Not many HOFers can say that.  Plus, he wasn’t an all-star the year he won his second MVP award (he had an .837 OPS at the break, .964 afterwards).

Also, he was a solid defensive SS (+25 Rtot) but a subpar CF once moved there (-72).   

Now back to your regularly scheduled program.  
 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would love to ask Longenhagen how he can justify Kjerstad at 7 with Cowser at 12.    Swing and miss?    Cowser struck out 27% on the year.   Kjerstad struck out 25% at Aberdeen and 30% in the AFL.   Cowser is still a "maybe" in CF and probably a plus RF.   Kjerstad is maybe an average RF.   Cowser made it to AAA and finished strongly.    Kjerstad struggled in A+ and did very well in the AFL (despit poor plate discipline numbers).   Tough to say what level the AFL is or was this year but I don't think it's AA quality.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ChuckS said:

Westburg with a 2024 ETA and Norby with a 2025 ETA. That has to be an error considering both these guys are already in Triple A. 

I didnt really pay attention to ETA after seeing Beavers at 2027. He's just taking wild guesses. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, emmett16 said:

Freak show!  One of my favorite players all time (mostly due to his commitment to the mustache).  

 

I was just joking about the seasoning (but nevertheless interesting to see his progression the first 6 years).  Man, I wasted like 30 min on his B-Ref page.  What a career.  

In the 70s and 80s I strongly disliked the Brew Crew (not NYY level), but I liked Yount.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RZNJ said:

Would love to ask Longenhagen how he can justify Kjerstad at 7 with Cowser at 12.    Swing and miss?    Cowser struck out 27% on the year.   Kjerstad struck out 25% at Aberdeen and 30% in the AFL.   Cowser is still a "maybe" in CF and probably a plus RF.   Kjerstad is maybe an average RF.   Cowser made it to AAA and finished strongly.    Kjerstad struggled in A+ and did very well in the AFL (despit poor plate discipline numbers).   Tough to say what level the AFL is or was this year but I don't think it's AA quality.

Probably the 50 power grade on Cowser, which to me feels low.  I'm no scout but after seeing Cowser flick a HR out to left center in Durham that looked destined for a long out, I'd like to think that he has above average power now, also admitting the hit tool may not be plus anymore.

Although I do agree with your sentiment, especially with how much importance Longenhagen seems to put on defense in his rankings.  Plus COF > average COF obviously every day of the week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, emmett16 said:

I like guys that can see the ball as long as possible.  That gives them a better chance to identify and hit a pitch.  You can measure that   with “trigger to impact” times.  Guys that are quick to get to their power and can wait as long as possible I believe thrive.  This is seen in natural oppo power.  I’ve seen Mayo swing and miss at a lot of seemingly very hittable pitches.  I’ve been slow to get excited but am hoping he is the next Troy Glaus.  

Maybe watch Cowser a bit and tell me the difference yet Cowser is significantly older than Mayo. Some of Mayo non-believers see what you want. I saw someone on here talk about how Mayo is the only guy that didn't improve as he moved up yet we have Henderson's 2021 where he went up to Aberdeen and struggled. You guys also don't like to remember he was very young (one of the youngest) in AA, missed most of 18-year old season between High School and pro ball, and has some of the best EVs and arms in the system.

I can't say Mayo is a sure thing, and ultimately, we'll see if he can clean up some of holes in his swing, but there's a ton of talent. I have to jump in when I see some of you saying something about a player young for his league who has some of the same problems as a player you fawn over who is a few years older and played mostly at the same levels.

Next year will give us a better idea of who Mayo is as a prospect. I will admit he's a guy with a very high ceiling, but also a low floor.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

Maybe watch Cowser a bit and tell me the difference yet Cowser is significantly older than Mayo. Some of Mayo non-believers see what you want. I saw someone on here talk about how Mayo is the only guy that didn't improve as he moved up yet we have Henderson's 2021 where he went up to Aberdeen and struggled. You guys also don't like to remember he was very young (one of the youngest) in AA, missed most of 18-year old season between High School and pro ball, and has some of the best EVs and arms in the system.

I can't say Mayo is a sure thing, and ultimately, we'll see if he can clean up some of holes in his swing, but there's a ton of talent. I have to jump in when I see some of you saying something about a player young for his league who has some of the same problems as a player you fawn over who is a few years older and played mostly at the same levels.

Next year will give us a better idea of who Mayo is as a prospect. I will admit he's a guy with a very high ceiling, but also a low floor.

Sure, Henderson struggled when he moved up in 2021.   I said this year will tell us if Mayo can make the adjustments.   Henderson made huge adjustments in 2022.   Mayo can do the same thing.   Everything else I said about Mayo is true.   His plate discipline numbers got worse at each level from Delmarva to Bowie.   He also looks to be very pull oriented.   I think he'll need to improve in both areas.   Does that make me a non-believer?    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

Maybe watch Cowser a bit and tell me the difference yet Cowser is significantly older than Mayo. Some of Mayo non-believers see what you want. I saw someone on here talk about how Mayo is the only guy that didn't improve as he moved up yet we have Henderson's 2021 where he went up to Aberdeen and struggled. You guys also don't like to remember he was very young (one of the youngest) in AA, missed most of 18-year old season between High School and pro ball, and has some of the best EVs and arms in the system.

I can't say Mayo is a sure thing, and ultimately, we'll see if he can clean up some of holes in his swing, but there's a ton of talent. I have to jump in when I see some of you saying something about a player young for his league who has some of the same problems as a player you fawn over who is a few years older and played mostly at the same levels.

Next year will give us a better idea of who Mayo is as a prospect. I will admit he's a guy with a very high ceiling, but also a low floor.

I haven’t had a chance to see Cowser play in person yet.  I agree Mayos talent is off the charts.  Size, arm Strength and raw power at his age  put him on a very elite bracket.  I’m pulling for him to put it all together.  He just makes me a little nervous to get too excited.  I’ll happily eat crow if he mashes and will be right there rooting for him.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Flash- bd said:

Thoughts on Juan Núñez? @Tony-OH

Haven't heard of him, they've got him pretty high. 

He was #44 in my top 75 prospects.

44. Juan Nunez – RHP (FCL/A): Acquired in the Jorge Lopez trade, brings a fastball that sits 94-96, but can touch 98 on occasion. His best offspeed pitch is his slider, though he also has a curveball and change. Has a long way to go command wise, but when he’s on, he has a starter’s repertoire.

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tony-OH said:

He was #44 in my top 75 prospects.

44. Juan Nunez – RHP (FCL/A): Acquired in the Jorge Lopez trade, brings a fastball that sits 94-96, but can touch 98 on occasion. His best offspeed pitch is his slider, though he also has a curveball and change. Has a long way to go command wise, but when he’s on, he has a starter’s repertoire.

Interesting! Didn't even remember him being part of the trade. Man, our system is deep...interesting guys even at 44 on your list, pretty cool to see! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
    • Elias needs to use better judgement when he dumpster dives, prepare better for the high percentage chance that his dumpster diving pickups will fail, and increase usage of other means to get pieces. Bullpen usage is another problem, but it’s hard to effectively juggle flaming torches. A wrong move burns badly 
    • I can see the case for Mountcastle based on defense alone, but what has Kjerstad done to warrant that kind of treatment? Is it the .505 OPS he’s put up since coming back? The overall .438 ML OPS since getting hit in the head? I’m as bummed as anyone that his season got derailed, but if you’re talking about where they are right now — he’s not your huckleberry. As for O’Hearn, he’s 8 for his last 23 (.348), with 3 doubles. That feels a little like the “getting himself together” that you referenced. He had an awful month-long slump, but he also has an extended track record (over 1.5 seasons) of excelling in the role he’s now back in, as the platoon LH 1B/DH guy. He had a 125 wRC+ in those 750 PAs as an Oriole until 8/20, which is roughly when Mountcastle went out.  I’d be good with Kjerstad DHing against LH starters, because there’s good reason to think he hits them better than O’Hearn. And if they want to play both O’Hearn and Kjerstad against some RHPs, in order to set up the potential of Mountcastle coming in to PH against a lefty reliever, I’m down for that too. But the primary alignment is going to (and should) be the Mountcastle/O’Hearn duo we’ve gotten accustomed to seeing.
    • The Achilles heel for this team is going to be the unit that doesn't step up in the postseason. I can easily see scenarios where: the bullpen is hot and provides good performances but the offense sputters and isn't clutch the offense comes up big but the bullpen blows games late starting pitching tosses some clunkers (not really likely with Burnes and Eflin) and they can't recover the defense sucks and gives opponents extra outs to work with, blowing games open when the bullpen or SP would have been able to escape and continue We've seen all of these units falter at one point or another during this season.  We've also seen all of these units perform very well at different times throughout the season.  So, we'll see what turns out to be the Achilles heel for the Orioles in the playoffs starting next week.
    • I agree I missed the mark on a correct forum, and ask a moderator to please relocate to Rants as that game annoyed me yesterday. I appreciate the strong moderators here and know I'm not one of them.     Sorry for making it worse at a tough moment.    I won't bump it again, even ironically if we kick their butts in the playoffs.
    • Nail hit on head. It really comes down to the offense in the playoffs for us. I think our pitching is good enough overall especially the starters. Shaky sometimes sure, but they can hold their own most of the time. If we don't bring our "A" hitting game in the playoffs we won't go far.
    • The bullpen has warts for sure, but if this offense doesn't figure out how to hit good pitching in the playoffs, the bullpen won't matter. Even I got a little excited when they put 5 and 9 up on the board Tues and Wed, and then it crashed back to reality last night when I remembered they were facing Schmidt and Stroman. When facing a real ace like Cole they were completely shut down. What's gonna happen next week when they face Skubal, Reagins, and/or Lugo? The mediocre bullpen won't matter if they can't figure out how to score some runs off pitchers like that...
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...