Jump to content

Westburg's Value at the trade dealine


Daddy-O's

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I imagine that was done on purpose. I'm fairly certain Wildcard believes Irvin will certainly implode by then and will be out of the rotation.

What would make you think that? I figured he just slipped Wildcard's mind in the 6 hours since his last thread started to throw shade at him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I imagine that was done on purpose. I'm fairly certain Wildcard believes Irvin will certainly implode by then and will be out of the rotation.

IMO the five I mentioned have higher ceilings than Irvin.  Hopefully they hit those ceilings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Clearly. The question is why he thinks we need that when we have Vavra and three near MLB ready prospects to do the same thing cheaper.

It helps me understand Frazier to see him as a Vavra vote of no confidence, and less to do with Westburg.

I wouldn't say it is the favorite, but it is still possible to me Westburg makes the team and the bench is Frazier, McCann, Stowers, McKenna.     Urias starting DH.

If our position player group is as fortunate health wise as last year, those Top 11 guys (excluding McCann/McKenna there) hog almost all the PA.

I would bet in the 1st half Rest is the watchword and everyone paces toward 500 PA.    I hope Gunnar gets a crack at 700.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

Westburg would not command 1.5 years of Burnes alone this July, but he (or one of the other MLB-ready Top 100 types) might represent around the value LAA might expect for 2-3 months of Ohtani, should their year break bad.

Nothing personal, but if Ohtani gets traded it will be to either the NYY, NYM, or LAD. They can afford to trade away their whole farm system.  We can’t. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wildcard said:

IMO the five I mentioned have higher ceilings than Irvin.  Hopefully they hit those ceilings.

The way you phrased it, "higher ceilings", is at least supportable. However, you are implying all 5 will be functioning at those levels mid-season to enable trades. Means won't be back until July at the earliest and who knows what version of himself he will be post TJ. Hall will likely be a SP in AAA under innings limits or, failing that, being converted to RP. Grayson hasn't thrown 1 MLB inning. Kremer and Bradish have not yet proven themselves to be MLB average SPs, like Irwin has these last 2 years. I love your optimism but if you truly believe all 5 will be performing that well mid-season, please send me copious quantities of whatever you are drinking/smoking. 😃

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

Clearly. The question is why he thinks we need that when we have Vavra and three near MLB ready prospects to do the same thing cheaper.

It doesn’t hurt to have a guy that’s had more than just a cup coffee in the big leagues especially on a very young team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

But does it help?

I doubt we have any data one way or another.

I think it has a lot more to do with the individuals.

I agree whole heartedly that it depends on the individual. 
 

Odor for instance was not great statistically but I do believe is presence in clubhouse last year helped us a lot especially with the young Latin players. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Nothing personal, but if Ohtani gets traded it will be to either the NYY, NYM, or LAD. They can afford to trade away their whole farm system.  We can’t. 

2 months of Ohtani, if the scenario comes to pass, isn't going to cost anyone's whole farm system.    The Angels get to choose the best deal for them.

Sure, the competition vs. the mega-rich for 2024 and beyond is hopeless when money is the currency of the realm, but that will not be the case this summer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Nothing personal, but if Ohtani gets traded it will be to either the NYY, NYM, or LAD. They can afford to trade away their whole farm system.  We can’t. 

If we push up the bidding to force the Yanks to offer Volpe, that is a great outcome. We have the advantage of being able to outbid anyone from our depth if we choose. Yanks advantage is being able to absorb salary.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

2 months of Ohtani, if the scenario comes to pass, isn't going to cost anyone's whole farm system.    The Angels get to choose the best deal for them.

Sure, the competition vs. the mega-rich for 2024 and beyond is hopeless when money is the currency of the realm, but that will not be the case this summer.

In theory, NYM will be have budget constraints.  NYY would have to offer Volpe or a big package to outbid us.  LAD has the prospects to pace us in bidding and arms if that’s the tie breaker.  

Ohtani is at least a reasonable consideration if we’re TOR and MOO away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

The prospects aren't left handed batters.

I don't think Vavra has enough glove for Elias.

Yep, I think you have nailed it.   We might not agree with these decisions, but I believe the motivations are spot on.

With the new field configuration at OPACY and the shift being eliminated, I believe Elias believes that there is a market inefficiency in which the value of lefthanded hitters versus righthanded hitters is increasing significantly in baseball and even moreso in Baltimore, as is the value of defensive skill at 2nd base.   So getting a LH 2Bman who field pretty well is where he put his 2nd biggest chunk of offseason dollars spent.

A lot of us disagree with the decision, but I believe that's his logic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Any jerk wad want to congratulate Duke Basketball or the Steelers? just go ahead and piss me off even more 
    • Agreed, they were trying to preserve Burnes there. The division still hadn't been clinched, so try to win the game but within the rest management plan for your ace. Hopefully the fact they used Cano means there aren't any major concerns about his rest, but now you have to wonder.
    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...