Jump to content

Giving Dan Duquette his due


wildcard

Recommended Posts

4+ years after Dan  Duquette and his staff left the O's here are the players on the major league roster that were acquired on his watch:

11 Pitchers - 12* if you count Mychal Givens

Grayson Rodriguez,  DL Hall, John Means, Dean Kremer, Felix Bautista, Mike Baumann, Dillon Tate, Keegan Akin, Nick Vespi, Bruce Zimmermann, Drew Rom

*Would Mychal Givens have signed with the the O's if he didn't have history with them? 

5 Position Players

Ryan Mountcastle, Cedric Mullins, Austin Hays, Anthony Santander, Ryan McKenna

Mike Elias must value them or they would not still be here.

Edited by wildcard
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Do you think Dan had anything to do with signing Davis to that contract?

Wasn't he the GM? Why wouldn't he be involved in the signing of that contract?

Edited by Jagwar
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 162m contract was a decision made at the ownership level by Peter Angelos.  Buck Showalter and Adam Jones went right passed Duquette to lobby Angelos to sign Davis.  Duquette and his staff may have handled the paper work but the decison was made above him. 

The point is well taken that Davis is still being paid by the O's but is not on the 40 man roster.

I found it interesting that after a tear down and rebuild by Elias the team still has so many players acquired by Duquette 4 years after he left the team.

Edited by wildcard
  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Jagwar said:

Any concrete evidence you can show to support that?


... my O’s boss at the time (Dan Duquette) had me working on economic evaluations of a new contract for Mr. Davis starting in August of 2015; none of the contemplated offers went beyond four years. I confidently wagered Mr. Duquette a lavish lunch in Little Italy that Mr. Davis’ value on the open market would be less than nine figures, overall.

The https://www.camdenchat.com/platform/amp/2019/4/9/18303386/orioles-chris-davis-contract-peter-angelosidea that there might have been a world where the Orioles did not go beyond either four years or $100 million to sign Davis is like a punch to the gut for me. Imagine how much less miserable all of this would seem now if this was the last year of Davis’s contract. He probably would have been cut loose long before he could get himself into his current 0-49 ditch.

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Jagwar said:

Any concrete evidence you can show to support that?

It was pretty well known at the time that DD only valued Davis up until a certain point (I believe that was somewhere in the 4-5 year 20-25M range) and that PA liked Davis and stepped in.

They essentially bid against themselves too.

https://mlb.nbcsports.com/2015/11/23/peter-angelos-is-directly-involved-in-chris-davis-negotiations/

Edited by Sports Guy
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sports Guy said:

It was pretty well known at the time that DD only valued Davis up until a certain point (I believe that was somewhere in the 4-5 year 20-25M range) and that PA liked Davis and stepped in.

They essentially bid against themselves too.

I think I agree with you, and I'm not trying to be a noodge. Just wondering if anyone ever went on the record saying that DD had nothing to do with the Davis signing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

... my O’s boss at the time (Dan Duquette) had me working on economic evaluations of a new contract for Mr. Davis starting in August of 2015; none of the contemplated offers went beyond four years. I confidently wagered Mr. Duquette a lavish lunch in Little Italy that Mr. Davis’ value on the open market would be less than nine figures, overall.

The https://www.camdenchat.com/platform/amp/2019/4/9/18303386/orioles-chris-davis-contract-peter-angelosidea that there might have been a world where the Orioles did not go beyond either four years or $100 million to sign Davis is like a punch to the gut for me. Imagine how much less miserable all of this would seem now if this was the last year of Davis’s contract. He probably would have been cut loose long before he could get himself into his current 0-49 ditch.

So if I read that correctly, it says that Walters went on the record, saying he advised Duquette on Davis' value. And the article also cites "voices within and outside the organization" but they didn't go on the record. And while the author says "we also know that Walters and Duquette were 'dismayed' that the Orioles might sign Davis", he doesn't offer a source for that statement. 

Like I said, I think I lean towards agreeing with the idea that Duquette wasn't involved in the signing of that awful contract. But I wish we were able to read something definitive from DD on the truth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jagwar said:

So if I read that correctly, it says that Walters went on the record, saying he advised Duquette on Davis' value. And the article also cites "voices within and outside the organization" but they didn't go on the record. And while the author says "we also know that Walters and Duquette were 'dismayed' that the Orioles might sign Davis", he doesn't offer a source for that statement. 

Like I said, I think I lean towards agreeing with the idea that Duquette wasn't involved in the signing of that awful contract. But I wish we were able to read something definitive from DD on the truth. 

The guy worked for Dan .. short of Dan or Peter saying it in public, not sure what evidence you want. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was good and bad with Duquette.

I think Duquette with Gary Rajisch did a good job in the draft.

He did a good job finding "unknowns" (Wei-Yen Chen, Miguel Gonzalez) that formed the basis of a respectable MLB rotation.

He gave up draft picks for bad MLB signings (Yovanni Gallardo).

He held on for at least a year too long with the core team that led to a terrible firesale.

I do not think the player development system was good under Duquette.  I think it is light years better under Elias.  

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • So cross off the name of a guy we had no chance of going after in the first place? Got it.
    • I know a lot of chatter on here, in terms of adding a TOR guy, has centered around Burnes.    This makes it more difficult, especially in terms of a trade and then extend him scenario.
    • If things go as planned, for the next 5 years, you have a boatload of talent around him making collectively very little money.  Maybe you look to trade him down the line?  Maybe you keep producing cheap talent and can always surround his contract with 10-15 guys making the league minimum. Quite frankly, that should be the plan anyway.
    • Can he play quarterback too? 😃 My answer is NO. He's a special player but it will be too much money tied up with one player for too long. Rather develop our own and then have the resources and will to extend them.
    • A quick look at Sportrac shows that Sherzer and Verlander at 12.9% of payroll, Judge at 14.9% and Cole at 13.44%, Bogaerts is a relative bargain at 10.74%.  12.5% of $400 million is $50 million and that is how I arrived at the suggested team payroll figure based on $50 million AAV.  Your 20% would require the payroll to be $250 million and currently only two teams reach that threshold - the Yankees and Mets.
    • As magnificent as Ohtani is, he hasn't been the best player on his team, much less the best player of all time. During Ohtani's time with the Angels (2018-2022), Ohtani has been less valuable than one of his teammates, a teammate who missed all but 39 games of the 2021 season (27.7 WAR for Trout in 2018-2022 versus 24.8 for Ohtani). Ohtani has had two great years as a two way player, one other excellent year as a hitter, and two pitching seasons lost to injury. He's a wonderful player, but he's only been a top WAR player for the past two years. He may be the most amazing player currently playing, but I think I think calling him the greatest player of all time is way, way over the top (even if you qualify it by "in this moment"...he came in second in WAR last year, had a poor season in 2020 (OPS+ of 79), didn't pitch in 2019, etc.). 
    • I wasn’t saying that he would magically make the team World Series winners 4 out of 6, I was saying what if that signing was the extra guy that made it happen. To be clear, I think the Os could go to the WS sometime soon(this year to the next 4) without him. There is a very solid core coming up and if they make the playoffs, they have as good a chance as anyone. It is basically a statistical crap shoot once the playoffs start.  
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...