Jump to content

Which O's players have the highest ceilings going forward


wildcard

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, wildcard said:

My thoughts on some of the points made.

Bautista - Is not just a reliever. He is a dominating close.  4 or 5 years of what we saw last year would be very valuable.  Think Zack Britton.  That is his ceiling IMO.

Mountcastle - Powerful guy.  But can he adjust  his hitting style to the Wall.   Davis couldn't adjust.  If he doesn't he is a average player.  Mountcastle defense has improve but that arm is one of the worst in the league for a 1B.

Santander - Is probably at his peak at 33 HR. 89 RBI.   Look as the player lower on the list.  How may of them can reach that level.  Maybe Kjerstad but there is much more uncertainty looking forward.

My view on Santander is you have to look at his whole game, not just offense. He just had his best year and it was worth 2.1 rWAR, 2.5 fWAR.  I think that’s about as high as his ceiling goes.  Hopefully he’ll prove me wrong.   

I think people overestimate the importance of the Wall in Mountcastle’s performance last year.  Truth is, he hit much better at home (.767 OPS) than on the road (.691).   He’s an all-fields hitter who, out of 130 qualified hitters, was 114th in pull percentage.   There’s no adjusting for him to do, he just needs better luck and to swing at fewer crappy pitches.   

As to Bautista, say his ceiling is Britton, as you say.   That’s still not that high a ceiling IMO unless he maintains it a lot longer than Britton did.  By the way, I’m not expecting Bautista to ever equal Britton’s 2016 season.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

My view on Santander is you have to look at his whole game, not just offense. He just had his best year and it was worth 2.1 rWAR, 2.5 fWAR.  I think that’s about as high as his ceiling goes.  Hopefully he’ll prove me wrong.   

I think people overestimate the importance of the Wall in Mountcastle’s performance last year.  Truth is, he hit much better at home (.767 OPS) than on the road (.691).   He’s an all-fields hitter who, out of 130 qualified hitters, was 114th in pull percentage.   There’s no adjusting for him to do, he just needs better luck and to swing at fewer crappy pitches.   

As to Bautista, say his ceiling is Britton, as you say.   That’s still not that high a ceiling IMO unless he maintains it a lot longer than Britton did.  By the way, I’m not expecting Bautista to ever equal Britton’s 2016 season.

 

As great as Bautista’s stuff is, Britton had a pitch and hitters knew exactly what the pitch was going to be and just couldn’t square it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, RZNJ said:

Right.  Ceilings are a funny thing.  Mullins went straight through his ceiling.  Here’s my list taking offense and defense into the equation just for position players.

1.  Henderson

2. Rutschman

3. Holliday

4. Mullins

5. Mateo

6. Cowser

7. Mayo

8. Ortiz

9. Basallo

10. Beavers

So what are you saying about Mateo and Ortiz with these ceiling rankings? Should they be everyday players?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, wildcard said:

So what are you saying about Mateo and Ortiz with these ceiling rankings? Should they be everyday players?

They are both plus SS defensively.    They both have potential offensively which makes their ceilings fairly high, IMO.    As long as they hit some, they are everyday players.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Frobby said:

My view on Santander is you have to look at his whole game, not just offense. He just had his best year and it was worth 2.1 rWAR, 2.5 fWAR.  I think that’s about as high as his ceiling goes.  Hopefully he’ll prove me wrong.   

I think people overestimate the importance of the Wall in Mountcastle’s performance last year.  Truth is, he hit much better at home (.767 OPS) than on the road (.691).   He’s an all-fields hitter who, out of 130 qualified hitters, was 114th in pull percentage.   There’s no adjusting for him to do, he just needs better luck and to swing at fewer crappy pitches.   

As to Bautista, say his ceiling is Britton, as you say.   That’s still not that high a ceiling IMO unless he maintains it a lot longer than Britton did.  By the way, I’m not expecting Bautista to ever equal Britton’s 2016 season.

 

The Wall effected Mountcastle quite a bit.   His away stats from 2021 (713 OPS) to 2022 (691 OPS) were similar.   But his home stats took a major hit.

2021   22 HR,    274/316/555/871

2022   11 HR,     274/327/440/767

Edited by wildcard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, wildcard said:

The Wall effected Mountcastle quite a bit.   His away stats from 2021 (713 OPS) to 2022 (713 OPS) were similar.   But his home stats took a major hit.

2021   22 HR,    274/316/555/871

2022   11 HR,     274/327/440/767

I didn’t mean to suggest that the Wall didn’t affect Mountcastle.  I’m just saying (1) it wasn’t the only issue, and (2) he’s not really a dead pull hitter by any means so I don’t think there’s really anything he can do to “adjust” to the Wall.

i think I’ve read reports that Mountcastle lost 5-6 homers to the Wall, so if he’s down 11 homers at home, the Wall is about half the cause of that.  

Your post has a typo - his road OPS was .691 last year, not .713.   And he really does need to hit better on the road if he wants to move up a peg or two.  
 

Edited by Frobby
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I didn’t mean to suggest that the Wall didn’t affect Mountcastle.  I’m just saying (1) it wasn’t the only issue, and (2) he’s not really a dead pull hitter by any means so I don’t think there’s really anything he can do to “adjust” to the Wall.

i think I’ve read reports that Mountcastle lost 5-6 homers to the Wall, so if he’s down 11 homers at home, the Wall is about half the cause of that.  

Your post has a typo - his road OPS was .691 last year, not .713.   And he really does need to hit better on the road if he wants to move up a peg or two.  
 

Thanks. Fixed it.

So that is why I had Mountcastle down the list.  He has to show he can adjust to the walk and hit on the road.

Edited by wildcard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

This list can't possibly be right I read on OH recently that Adley has already peaked as a baseball player. We should be seeing threads posted on Adley's trade value and why doesn't Elias sell high on him.

 

More serious take: I'd probably have Gunnar at #1 and Adley ranked just below him.

From an offensive standpoint I can see Gunnar over Adley but not when what Adley does to improve the pitchers is added in.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Huh?

If you are looking at his "ceiling" you are assuming that he's made these adjustments.

To me Mountcastle’s ceiling rests on being more selective at the plate.  If he does that, he’ll come close to his ceiling.  Easy to say and tough to do, but look at the strides Santander made in that area last year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, wildcard said:

From an offensive standpoint I can see Gunnar over Adley but not when what Adley does to improve the pitchers is added in.     

I'll admit to being a Gunnar fanboy and my thought is Gunnar's prime is going to be longer than Adley's. From an impact standpoint the next few years I give Adley the edge for sure.

Whatever the case it's a nice problem to have as opposed to hoping mediocre prospects turn into star players. Given Elias' draft strategy the Orioles should end up having an abundance of position player talent that can be spun off to acquire pitching help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...