Jump to content

Which O's players have the highest ceilings going forward


wildcard

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

I didn’t say you did.  It was a question.  
 

High draft pedigree + high performances = highest ceiling.  In my world at least.  If those two had foundered at all, sure it could be up for debate.  But they have not.  They have the pedigree, they have the best tools, they have the highest ceiling IMO.  

Draft pedigree becomes increasingly less important as a professional resume is developed as a player progresses through the minors.

To the point really, where it is essentially irrelevant as a player ascends to MLB.

I think that was the point. And it was a valid one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

You are making the case for Holliday and Rutschman because their performance to date has justified their draft position.  That isn’t always the case.  I still think Gunnar has a higher ceiling than Holliday but I can understand someone disagreeing.

But in this scenario, answering the question what players in the Orioles system has the highest ceiling, it is the case.  

 

I'll take my chances with Holiday, who by all accounts looks to be on a better trajectory and significantly outperformed Gunnar at a younger age.  

Jackson Holliday Minor Leagues Statistics | Baseball-Reference.com

Gunnar Henderson Minor Leagues Statistics | Baseball-Reference.com

Edited by emmett16
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Holliday might have a better hit tool than Gunnar which might give him the overall edge but Gunnar probably beats him in power, running, and arm.

Why would you say that?  At a younger age in the same league Holiday out slugged him, out hit him, out walked him, struck-out less, and hit for more power.

Edited by emmett16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

Why would you say that?  At a younger age in the same league Holiday out slugged him, out hit him, out walked him, struck-out less, and hit for more power.

Henderson, obviously made huge improvements in 2022.   Holliday might be a better hitter at 18-19 than Henderson was at 20 but that doesn’t mean he’ll be better in the long run.   Most players don’t make the leap Henderson did.   He walked more than he struck out at Bowie. That’s the hitter Holliday is now which is why Holliday might have the higher ceiling.  Henderson is the bigger, stronger man.   I don’t think Holliday will ever have as much power as Henderson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Henderson, obviously made huge improvements in 2022.   Holliday might be a better hitter at 18-19 than Henderson was at 20 but that doesn’t mean he’ll be better in the long run.   Most players don’t make the leap Henderson did.   He walked more than he struck out at Bowie. That’s the hitter Holliday is now which is why Holliday might have the higher ceiling.  Henderson is the bigger, stronger man.   I don’t think Holliday will ever have as much power as Henderson.

Precisely. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Henderson, obviously made huge improvements in 2022.   Holliday might be a better hitter at 18-19 than Henderson was at 20 but that doesn’t mean he’ll be better in the long run.   Most players don’t make the leap Henderson did.   He walked more than he struck out at Bowie. That’s the hitter Holliday is now which is why Holliday might have the higher ceiling.  Henderson is the bigger, stronger man.   I don’t think Holliday will ever have as much power as Henderson.

Of course he is.  He's 30 months older.  They almost look like twins if you look at their age 18 y/o photos.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

Of course he is.  He's 30 months older.  They almost look like twins if you look at their age 18 y/o photos.  

Haha.  Not even close.  Henderson is taller and has a bigger frame.   Holliday is maybe 6 feet tall.  I suspect he’s under by a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Henderson is an inch to two taller than Rutschman.  Rutschman is 2-3 inches taller than Holliday.  Holliday is listed at 6’1.  Rutschman at 6’2.  Henderson at 6’3.  If you accept those that’s a 2 inch height advantage to Henderson.   I think someone is fudging Holliday’s height.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...