Jump to content

Which O's players have the highest ceilings going forward


wildcard

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

You can’t assume a player will get stronger or add velo or put in the time needed. You are solely basing ceiling off of the talent they have at that time but talent isn’t stagnant.  If it were, then you would have a point.

I think scouts assume gains in strength, velo etc. all the time when judging ceiling.   That’s what all this stuff about a body being “projectable” etc. is all about.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I think scouts assume gains in strength, velo etc. all the time when judging ceiling.   That’s what all this stuff about a body being “projectable” etc. is all about.  

Sure..but you can’t assume everything happens and you can’t assume talent is stagnant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My ceiling needs painting. Real games to discuss can't get here soon enough! 😀

Long time ago, I taught math. Concept of infinity. Boundlessness. There is no ceiling. How high is up? How far can you go? Most athletes (or regular people even) strive to improve. Lots of variables. Talk about subjective measure? 

My head is spinning. Need my meds! WC has done it again with major assistance. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, RZNJ said:

You think the heights listed are always accurate?   Look at the photo of Rutschman and Holliday.  Do you think Rutschman is only one inch taller?

While I’m not doubting that people fudge their height and weight, it is also possible Adley is wearing cleats and Jackson is wearing sneakers in the photo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jackson - He’s a skinny thumper with a great approach to hitting already.  His current stats and age put him with a higher ceiling but he still has a broader range of outcomes (a greater chance of reaching any point below that ceiling).

Gunnar - He was a skinny skills guy who has developed great plate discipline and filled out.  He can still bump his ceiling higher but he’s got less time to influence expectations.

Adley - A tank with an awesome ceiling coming into his peak years.  He be probably should be ranked higher but I’m a sucker for new toys!

Grayson - My expectations for him are only exceeded previously by Ben Mc and pre-injury Bundy.  

Mayo/Kjerstad - Highest power ceilings in the org.  

Ortiz - Complete package ceiling.

Projectabilty changes as a player grows, develops, and performs.  Either they fail to live up to the hope and a new lower ceiling is more foreseeable (Matusz).  Or they hit the previous foreseeable projections and set a higher bar (Gunnar).  But something fundamental has to change to change the trajectory/foreseeable expectations.  And one factor working against us all is Father Time and the eventual atrophy that catches us all to influence our performance.

Just like us in our lives.  Just ask your wife if you’re not sure…. :D Are we living up to projections or failing to live up to the hype we set before “I do”?!  /end of sermon/

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, waroriole said:

Dude, you came after wildcard and missed. Don’t get salty for him calling you out. 

Anyone can talk smack when their thread is up 6+ pages. I’m not salty, despite your perception. Would have been impressed if he had the gumption to reply on page 1 and tell me to F off, but here we are. 
 

But again, it’s not a new discussion, per SG’s post it’s a rehash of the constant talk about who has the biggest upside here and WC’s OP rankings somewhat mirrored prospect lists but had younger veterans like RMC thrown in the mix.  
 

Yeah, we know who has the high ceilings already, we talk about it all the time. Whether someone thinks Henderson is over Holiday or vice versa is a bit nit picky, they both have high ceilings at the end of the day. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Anyone can talk smack when their thread is up 6+ pages. I’m not salty, despite your perception. Would have been impressed if he had the gumption to reply on page 1 and tell me to F off, but here we are. 
 

But again, it’s not a new discussion, per SG’s post it’s a rehash of the constant talk about who has the biggest upside here and WC’s OP rankings somewhat mirrored prospect lists but had younger veterans like RMC thrown in the mix.  
 

Yeah, we know who has the high ceilings already, we talk about it all the time. Whether someone thinks Henderson is over Holiday or vice versa is a bit nit picky, they both have high ceilings at the end of the day. 

If I did what you suggest the thread dies because it becomes about you and I bickering instead of the thread topic.   

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

Anyone can talk smack when their thread is up 6+ pages. I’m not salty, despite your perception. Would have been impressed if he had the gumption to reply on page 1 and tell me to F off, but here we are. 
 

But again, it’s not a new discussion, per SG’s post it’s a rehash of the constant talk about who has the biggest upside here and WC’s OP rankings somewhat mirrored prospect lists but had younger veterans like RMC thrown in the mix.  
 

Yeah, we know who has the high ceilings already, we talk about it all the time. Whether someone thinks Henderson is over Holiday or vice versa is a bit nit picky, they both have high ceilings at the end of the day. 

Not salty, but quite a bit of Sodium Chloride.  Jokes to come for sure.  See what you did there ^^^

Hopefully no one is "butt hurt".   Just letting you know you are embarrassing yourself on the internet.  But, hey - keep up the cool guy persona, you're the 5th most popular poster this week, it seems to work well ;) Trouble with the curve? 

Edit:  I apologize for the personal attack.  My goal being a member here has been to avoid these situations.  But when I see a member who provides very little value and makes their living off cheap homophobic jokes and poking fun at other members, I feel the need to call them out.  Again, apologize for stepping out of my lane. 

Edited by emmett16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...