Jump to content

“Winning Fixes Everything”


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

 

I would assume anyone in a position like his would have known about the cheating or at least about the general culture that facilitated it. However, people that are part of an organization have different levels of responsibility. Was it his idea? Did he order people to do it? I don't think we have any evidence of that although I have not read the book. Maybe he did nothing to oppose it but that happens all the time in big organizations. 

I think the fact that Sig and Eve followed him from the Astros to the O's is a solid indicator that he is not a toxic person. 

 

Have not read the book, but media distortion and smearing  sounds  like the case if politics and extramarital life is included.  I care less about either.  Obviously the cheating issue could be a problem but it has been years now and nothing really there for Elias as of yet. 
I agree very much that one measure of interpersonal leadership is both the quality of people who come work for you and the stability of their tenures.  By all appearances, he has had excellent results up and down the organization .. Sig, Perez. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Yardball85 said:

Agreed.  While I don't like hearing about the cheating on his spouse, Elias has given me every reason to like him as a baseball fan.  And that is what I care about. 

I met Allie before I met Mike. There didn't seem to be any smoke there, let alone fire.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's certainly hard to reconcile the version of Elias in the book versus what we've seen over the past 4 years. Not re: the politics, but just in general. He seems like a super nice, respectful guy. But I guess to be in these high profile jobs, you have to be pretty good at putting on a face. That said, his team seems to all be smart and pulling in the same direction. The vibes all seem very good, from the coaching staff to the front office. I would think his team runs the spectrum politically, too, so it's not like he's packing the room with one type of person, or yes-men, etc.

That said, it's the Orioles, and it's proooobably only a matter of time before we start to hear of some kind of Warehouse drama. Right now it's been contained to Angelos, which is nice and familiar at least. But Elias seems to be running a well-oiled machine in the baseball ops department. 

Edited by interloper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, wildcard said:

We don't need to a tell all book to explain Mike Elias to us.   He has been here for 4 years.   I think most of us know what kind of guy he is.

Do we? Or do we know the results of how he's run the organization so far? Other then meeting him a few times (Very cordial and seemed like a good guy) and interviews, I don't think I know him as a person at all.

Perhaps you've had personal conversations with him and know him better or perhaps you judge people by their press pesona. 

Now I don't know or care about his politics or anything else that would be "personal" in nature. I care whether he can put a consistent playoff contender on the field year in and year out. The rest is just noise. 

There are very few people in the world that I've met that no one has anything bad to say about. I really don't care what could possibly come out about how Elias got to where he is at this point. He just needs to show me a winning team on the major league field.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a hypothetical for you.   You're the assistant GM.   You know your team is cheating with the video/garbage lid system.   You don't think it's right.   The players and manager are ok with it and the GM is ok with it.   Do you keep your mouth shut or be the guy who turns your own team in?

We're looking for honesty here!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Here's a hypothetical for you.   You're the assistant GM.   You know your team is cheating with the video/garbage lid system.   You don't think it's right.   The players and manager are ok with it and the GM is ok with it.   Do you keep your mouth shut or be the guy who turns your own team in?

We're looking for honesty here!

I'd keep my mouth shut.

Here's a hypothetical for you.  You're the assistant GM.  You know your team is cheating with the video/garbage lid system.  You think it's fine.  The players and manager are OK with it and the GM is OK with it.  Do you distance yourself from the whole mess when the house of cards come tumbling down?

We're looking for honestly here!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Do we? Or do we know the results of how he's run the organization so far? Other then meeting him a few times (Very cordial and seemed like a good guy) and interviews, I don't think I know him as a person at all.

Perhaps you've had personal conversations with him and know him better or perhaps you judge people by their press pesona. 

Now I don't know or care about his politics or anything else that would be "personal" in nature. I care whether he can put a consistent playoff contender on the field year in and year out. The rest is just noise. 

There are very few people in the world that I've met that no one has anything bad to say about. I really don't care what could possibly come out about how Elias got to where he is at this point. He just needs to show me a winning team on the major league field.

We know he is consistent following the same objective since Nov of 2018. 

We know he is loyal to the people he respects like Sig, Hyde and Holt.

We know he is a good organizer putting a farm system together.

We know he has a long term vision that includes building with international talent.

We know he is a good communicator.

We know he will give women employees a chance.

We know he loves to scout and does not forget the ones he liked years ago.

I can go on and on but I think we know a lot about  Mike Elias.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'd keep my mouth shut.

Here's a hypothetical for you.  You're the assistant GM.  You know your team is cheating with the video/garbage lid system.  You think it's fine.  The players and manager are OK with it and the GM is OK with it.  Do you distance yourself from the whole mess when the house of cards come tumbling down?

We're looking for honestly here!

 

 

Depends what you mean by distance yourself.   Please give me something to go with.     Sure, I keep my mouth shut and hope they don't come after me.    If I'm interviewed it gets pretty tricky.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Depends what you mean by distance yourself.   Please give me something to go with.     Sure, I keep my mouth shut and hope they don't come after me.    If I'm interviewed it gets pretty tricky.   

I'd say something like:

Quote

“Yeah, it’s tough ... It’s a shame," he said during his own media availability at the event, which was held at the new Atlanta Braves spring training complex. “Obviously, the personal people involved, it’s been very difficult to watch what’s happened there. It’s also been disappointing to learn what we’ve seen about the things that happened in the 2017, 2018 time frame coming to light.”

Of course I'd say the same thing if I knew and didn't approve or didn't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Maybe.  Tough to say until you're actually in that spot and your career/job is potentially on the line.

I don't think my job would be on the line if it came out I knew.  Look at what happened to those actually involved.

Now if it came out it was my plan that was implemented, that could be a different situation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the book. Been reading it for a couple of days. I did not start on the first chapter but later on. 
 

- nothing on Elias personal life so far other than his politics. Could be something in there earlier. Drellich’s personal bias shines thru IMO

- Mike was Asst GM in title but was not really in reality the number 2 guy. He was more on his own with running scouting 

-Sig leaving was at worst mutual. I think organization was ready to move on. Sig would email Hinch about game decisions. His draft model did not have some of the new data from the hi tech stuff. That caused some issues. 
 

Basically Luhnow pushed people. He wanted people uncomfortable. 

 

The theme so far for me is about how driven and cost conscious the organization was. 

  • Upvote 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brandon Taubman is a big part of the book where I’ve been reading. He basically became Luhnow’s right hand man. Willing to please, Wall Street type. 
Had a heck of a downfall. 

Luhnow brought in McKinsey to oversee stuff in 2017. That created issues.  
 

Luhnow wanted tension. He hired a bunch of people from the outside world. 
 

A part of book is about scouting. Basically the TrackMan and other hi tech stuff replaced scouts. Bottom line is it works. Astros were before their time on this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...