Jump to content

Jordan Westburg 2023


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, waroriole said:

Just completely inexcusable that he continues to torch AAA while Mateo plays every day putting up a sub .275 OBP. 

Service time manipulation. For a low spending team it makes little sense to start the clock on an infielder when we have a surplus of infielders right now. They've already decided Ortiz is the next man up to get his shot. Although Ortiz blew it in the limited Plate Appearances he got. 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Mr-splash said:

Service time manipulation. For a low spending team it makes little sense to start the clock on an infielder when we have a surplus of infielders right now. They've already decided Ortiz is the next man up to get his shot. Although Ortiz blew it in the limited Plate Appearances he got. 

Ortiz did fine, and will be back. The Orioles place a high value on infield defense and will give Mateo plenty of rope. I think Westbirg will find a good role with the Orioles eventually, but he will never be our starting SS.  His defense there is okay but Mateo, Ortiz and Henderson are all better and Holliday is probably better too.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, seak05 said:

I really don’t think they’re trying to manipulate service time with westburg. He’s just not LH and elias is obsessed with a platoon 

(it’s also past service time manipulation deadlines)

I don’t think service time manipulation is a factor in the case of Westburg either, but the Super 2 cutoff, which is unknowable right now, has been as late as June 15 in the recent past.  So, it’s not really “safe” to assume that a player promoted in the next 2 weeks wouldn’t qualify as a Super 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Mr-splash said:

Service time manipulation. For a low spending team it makes little sense to start the clock on an infielder when we have a surplus of infielders right now. They've already decided Ortiz is the next man up to get his shot. Although Ortiz blew it in the limited Plate Appearances he got. 

Service time manipulation is done with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Service time manipulation is done with.

Not until Super 2 date sometime in mid-June but I know you already know that. ME is playing some game we are not seeing with AAAA rehab guys not being promoted even when they are performing and there is need. He goes out and gets another. I wonder what the prospects are thinking?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, AnythingO's said:

Not until Super 2 date sometime in mid-June but I know you already know that. ME is playing some game we are not seeing with AAAA rehab guys not being promoted even when they are performing and there is need. He goes out and gets another. I wonder what the prospects are thinking?

Prospects are thinking that if they keep playing well someone will want them in the majors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, AnythingO's said:

Not until Super 2 date sometime in mid-June but I know you already know that. ME is playing some game we are not seeing with AAAA rehab guys not being promoted even when they are performing and there is need. He goes out and gets another. I wonder what the prospects are thinking?

Super 2 isn’t service time manipulation. Those are 2 different things. We are also very likely outside of that window, although it’s not definite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wildcard said:

Prospects are thinking that if they keep playing well someone will want them in the majors.

I'm sure that's what Norby is thinking but Westburg and Kjerstad are kicking down doors with Cowser and Mayo and Ortiz just behind them. The you have Diaz and Cameron seemingly "fixed" with MLB experience at positions where Hyde is throwing misfits (RF, 1B) and even the freebies can't get a shot. Total Tin Hat, Conspiracy Theory on my part, but could we be seeing a ME-Hyde disconnect ala later DD-Buck. If you don't use my prospects the right way I'm gonna take them back? Like Buck played Teagarten until DD DFAed him. Stowers did well enough last year to get a shot. This year Hyde plays Frazier and Vavra in RF over Stowers, Stowers makes a circus catch in LF and goes down. Comes back up, doesn't hit, back down. Since then, crickets from ME including not using the Norfolk express hardly at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Super 2 isn’t service time manipulation. Those are 2 different things. We are also very likely outside of that window, although it’s not definite.

Sure it is.

You are manipulating the service time in an attempt to lower what the player's projected compensation will be while he is with the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

Sure it is.

You are manipulating the service time in an attempt to lower what the player's projected compensation will be while he is with the team.

I meant, that his service time is done in terms of gaining a year. Whether we call him up now or in Sept or the beginning of May, the service time stays the same.

Super 2 is the same service time, it just adds a year of arb.

If you want to argue that we are holding him back because of super 2, that’s fine but that’s not the same as holding him back for service time manipulation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

I meant, that his service time is done in terms of gaining a year. Whether we call him up now or in Sept or the beginning of May, the service time stays the same.

Super 2 is the same service time, it just adds a year of arb.

If you want to argue that we are holding him back because of super 2, that’s fine but that’s not the same as holding him back for service time manipulation.

It's still service time manipulation.  They would be literally manipulating his service time to their advantage.

It just isn't about years of team control.

Both actions qualify for the term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
    • Elias needs to use better judgement when he dumpster dives, prepare better for the high percentage chance that his dumpster diving pickups will fail, and increase usage of other means to get pieces. Bullpen usage is another problem, but it’s hard to effectively juggle flaming torches. A wrong move burns badly 
    • I can see the case for Mountcastle based on defense alone, but what has Kjerstad done to warrant that kind of treatment? Is it the .505 OPS he’s put up since coming back? The overall .438 ML OPS since getting hit in the head? I’m as bummed as anyone that his season got derailed, but if you’re talking about where they are right now — he’s not your huckleberry. As for O’Hearn, he’s 8 for his last 23 (.348), with 3 doubles. That feels a little like the “getting himself together” that you referenced. He had an awful month-long slump, but he also has an extended track record (over 1.5 seasons) of excelling in the role he’s now back in, as the platoon LH 1B/DH guy. He had a 125 wRC+ in those 750 PAs as an Oriole until 8/20, which is roughly when Mountcastle went out.  I’d be good with Kjerstad DHing against LH starters, because there’s good reason to think he hits them better than O’Hearn. And if they want to play both O’Hearn and Kjerstad against some RHPs, in order to set up the potential of Mountcastle coming in to PH against a lefty reliever, I’m down for that too. But the primary alignment is going to (and should) be the Mountcastle/O’Hearn duo we’ve gotten accustomed to seeing.
    • The Achilles heel for this team is going to be the unit that doesn't step up in the postseason. I can easily see scenarios where: the bullpen is hot and provides good performances but the offense sputters and isn't clutch the offense comes up big but the bullpen blows games late starting pitching tosses some clunkers (not really likely with Burnes and Eflin) and they can't recover the defense sucks and gives opponents extra outs to work with, blowing games open when the bullpen or SP would have been able to escape and continue We've seen all of these units falter at one point or another during this season.  We've also seen all of these units perform very well at different times throughout the season.  So, we'll see what turns out to be the Achilles heel for the Orioles in the playoffs starting next week.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...