Jump to content

Jordan Westburg 2023


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Matt Bennett said:

I think this is Elias speak for “we are about to promote him”. But I feel like he has this weird policy of not promoting “real prospects” to replace an injury void, and only promoting them when they’re “ready”. Perhaps after they’ve finished with the string of RHP’s? Which is a stupid reason to keep him down. Open 40 man roster spot. Westburg can fill exactly the roll Urias was playing. 

He has been saying the same thing about Westburg for a while now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, yark14 said:

I find it interesting how unexcited the organization is about Westburg.  When Adley and Gunnar were in AAA, the MASN broadcasters seemed to give daily updates on their performances.  Elias would talk about them frequently in interviews.  We'd see hype videos all the time.  Westburg has been hitting better than either of them did at AAA for a longer period of time and literally nothing.  Rarely mentioned by the MASN folks, Elias gives brief and generic responses in interviews, and I've yet to see any sort of hype video.

The lack of PR/marketing around him has me convinced they've been set on trading him for a long time.

The problem is you can't give a "Welcome To the Show" T-shirt promotion for every guy that comes up.  

Frankly I think the way they handle MLB promotions in general is just really, really weird.  Not saying it's wrong (though I think it is) but definitely weird.  Westburg is just latest example.  They're obsessed with the righty/lefty thing - you have a RHB in Urias...that plays the same positions that Westburg does....and when he goes down you don't replace him with Westburg?  Who's killing it in AAA?  Just makes no sense.  

They get a lot of rope because they've done a great job at drafting and developing MiLB players so far, but if we weren't conditioned to the way they do things this would all seem very bizarre.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, glenn__davis said:

The problem is you can't give a "Welcome To the Show" T-shirt promotion for every guy that comes up.  

Frankly I think the way they handle MLB promotions in general is just really, really weird.  Not saying it's wrong (though I think it is) but definitely weird.  Westburg is just latest example.  They're obsessed with the righty/lefty thing - you have a RHB in Urias...that plays the same positions that Westburg does....and when he goes down you don't replace him with Westburg?  Who's killing it in AAA?  Just makes no sense.  

They get a lot of rope because they've done a great job at drafting and developing MiLB players so far, but if we weren't conditioned to the way they do things this would all seem very bizarre.

I can’t wrap my head around the idea that they haven’t played him at first. Seems like if he could play first, he would be up here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There have been a lot of conflicting reports on Westburg's arm strength in the past.   I watched last night's game and he played SS.   On one play he went into the hole and put everything into the throw and it had plenty of zip.   I'd say he's at least average from SS.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RZNJ said:

There have been a lot of conflicting reports on Westburg's arm strength in the past.   I watched last night's game and he played SS.   On one play he went into the hole and put everything into the throw and it had plenty of zip.   I'd say he's at least average from SS.  

Strength is avg.  accuracy is what needs more consistency.  IMO it’s mostly due to his footwork, which can be very challenging when play different positions (different attack/ throwing angles for each IF position). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Chaka Garcia said:

Westburg deserves to be promoted, but nowhere to play in the IF. Maybe the same next year if Mateo and Urias stay.

He has to be next man up.   I fully anticipate him getting 150-200 ABs for the Os this year (or at least I did going into the season). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

He has to be next man up.   I fully anticipate him getting 150-200 ABs for the Os this year (or at least I did going into the season). 

He may be next man up but he doesn't have to be.  Ortiz offers a good combination of hitting and fielding.  Plus he is on the 40 man roster while Westburg is not.   Up to Elias who is next man up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, wildcard said:

He may be next man up but he doesn't have to be.  Ortiz offers a good combination of hitting and fielding.  Plus he is on the 40 man roster while Westburg is not.   Up to Elias who is next man up.

Westburg is the better fit at 2B and 3B while Ortiz is the better fit at 2B and SS. I'm not sure how Ortiz would be at 3B. If Mateo craters then Ortiz can replace him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, wildcard said:

He may be next man up but he doesn't have to be.  Ortiz offers a good combination of hitting and fielding.  Plus he is on the 40 man roster while Westburg is not.   Up to Elias who is next man up.

Severus Snape Obviously GIFs | Tenor

Sorry, couldn't resist. 😁

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, wildcard said:

He may be next man up but he doesn't have to be.  Ortiz offers a good combination of hitting and fielding.  Plus he is on the 40 man roster while Westburg is not.   Up to Elias who is next man up.

I believe the Westburg has more to offer this team if an every day role opens up. Ortiz might prove to be a better choice if it's more of a utility role. I'm not entirely sold that his offensive production will hold up as well to big league pitching as Westburg's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Chaka Garcia said:

Westburg deserves to be promoted, but nowhere to play in the IF. Maybe the same next year if Mateo and Urias stay.

Nonsense. Jordan has the same positional profile as Urias. Ramon was playing alot. Westburg can absolutely be a direct replacement and it's an inexplicable shame he is not already here. O'Hearn does not need to be on the roster. McCann should not be DHing ever. Vavra can be a useful piece but he is not a priority play. 4 guys between 2B, SS, and 3B not to mention the DH spot is perfectly reasonable.  Especially considering Frazier has consistently weaker career splits against LHP. If Urias comes back and everyone is producing, that's a tougher story. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • There’s a good chance McCann starts game one with Burnes. Big roster. We can always move Adley from DH to C late in the game. Lose the DH, but have a big enough bench to just pinch hit and double switch to hide the pitcher’s spot coming up.  So really we’d only be sacrificing 2 ABs from O’Hearn/Mounty/Kjerstad but we get Burnes throwing to his boy every pitch. 
    • We would have lost last night regardless due to zero runs scored by the offense. It is worrisome that Cano looked awful in back to back games. After talk about arm soreness. He has been the one reliable guy. Once we fell behind I don't really care how bad Bowman and Baker are. Hopefully they don't even make the roster for the playoffs. 
    • Don’t sleep on Povich getting a chance to eliminate the team that traded him away. That kind of stuff matters. The little extra…
    • I do worry about the McCann start although he has been hitting lately, so maybe you can justify it.
    • It’s the 7th inning with Burnes or Eflin on the bump. A tough lefty is coming up. Who you bringing in?  Perez or Coloumbe?  
    • My thoughts: - I agree that the Achilles heel is the bullpen and not the offense (especially with Westburg, Mountcastle, Urias, and Kjerstad back). - I also agree that Perez is overused in high leverage situations. This is going to come down to the degree you expect his “clutch” performance to be predictive going forward.  - I second the notion that most good bullpens are built with some degree of dumpster diving.  If you go back to offseason threads, there were not many desired bullpen FA targets (outside of unrealistic ones like Hader) that would have worked out well.  Maybe we haven’t “dumpster dived” well enough as evidenced by the success of Kaleb Ort in Houston. - Jacob Webb hasn’t been sharp since returning from the IL and Bowman has looked shaky his last few times out. - We don’t have a true closer, only a group of mostly effective set-up men in Dominguez, Cano, and Coulombe. - Part of me wishes they would be more aggressive with G-Rod and the Mountain. While we expect the team to continue to contend, you never really know how many times you’ll be back in the playoffs. However, I know in my head they are probably making the right decision. - I also feel like they should be auditioning McDermot, Selby, Young, or Strowd (who has been very good since August after rough Norfolk start). They could option Baker who I think is unlikely to have a path to trusted status after last year’s ALDS performance. This feeling may be mostly driven by dissatisfaction with the current state and wanting something better.  It might be unrealistic to expect options unproven at the MLB level to suddenly step in and be key playoff pieces.
    • Oh if we’re talking about what they will do, I can see it being something stupid like McCann at C and Adley at DH. I do think Mullins has enough veteranosity to outweigh Hyde’s obsession with L/R matchups. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...