Jump to content

Adam Frazier 2023


Frobby

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, Pickles said:

Just to be clear, you don't have anything supporting this position but your feels.

You have a right to that position, but others have a right to point out it isn't based anything solid.

Here's what we do know: Frazier has been our second best infielder this year.  He's outperformed everyone except Mateo, and he'll soon catch him if Mateo doesn't start hitting.

And to be clear, you have nothing to support yours. You have zero idea how Westburg would be playing.

You have something to support Frazier but his defense is declining and the offense has largely seen his OPS in the 600s. And he’s very slow.

Now, I really like that Frazier puts the ball in play. He is a 2014 KC Royal guy.  They drive you crazy. I definitely feel that’s a skill that has become very underrated in todays game.  

Edited by Sports Guy
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be one thing if Frazier was hitting like Odor last year.  He's not.  Clearly, folks just want the new shiny toys from Norfolk up here and assume they will be as good as Frazier.  There are no guarantees.  And, much of this is emotional, and it's a gamble to go from a known major league commodity to the "hope" and "promise" of someone performing well at AAA.

At the end of the day, I WANT Frazier to perform well enough that some other team finds real value in him at the deadline, and we can deal from a position of strength and maybe get some decent minor league talent back.  I don't ever see Frazier being part of a deal that brings us an ace, but maybe a player or two to develop while we promote an Ortiz for good, or a Westburg.  

In the meantime, I'll take his contributions to our current success, and we should all be happy with that.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, owknows said:

At the time we made the signing I considered it a serious head-scratcher. At that time, I mentioned the possibility that Elias may have considered Frazier a short term stopgap, and that with a little luck he could be flipped at the deadline if he showed a sustained resurgence. I considered this an attempt by Elias to be just a little too cute. Maybe in retrospect that's how it works itself out.

Get a half-season of decent ball out of Frazier as a low risk reclamation project and flip him at peak for high value MiLB pieces at the deadline... clearing the way for Westburg... or whoever else is beating on the door.

You aren’t getting anything for Frazier at the deadline.  His value will be to the team, not in a trade.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

And to be clear, you have nothing to support yours. You have zero idea how Westburg would be playing.

You have something to support Frazier but Frazier defense is declining and the offense has largely seen his OPS in the 600s.

Now, I really like that Frazier puts the ball in play. He is a 2014 KC Royal guy.  They drive you crazy. I definitely feel that’s a skill that has become very underrated in todays game.  

No, I have something concrete supporting my position.

Frazier has been our second most valuable infielder.  And with Mateo's trajectory, probably soon to be our most.

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

You aren’t getting anything for Frazier at the deadline.  His value will be to the team, not in a trade.

Well, he's here.  If what you're saying is true.....and assuming he continues to bring value to our team, what would you do at the deadline?  Keep him and keep the kids on the farm?  Trade him for no value?  Or, cut him to make room for one of the AAA guys?  Those are your choices if you can't/won't get "anything" for him.

So, as GM, what's your move??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

You aren’t getting anything for Frazier at the deadline.  His value will be to the team, not in a trade.

If he's OPSing in the .800s at the break... I'm sure you could turn a couple decent low-minors players for him.

The question is whether you think he'll regress or not.

Today's Frazier is a significant asset. So was yesterday's Mateo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DirtyBird said:

Then how about we sacrifice Gunnar’s .685 OPS to find out.

I have no problem with that...  although I've been watching Gunnar's lifeless body pretty closely.. and I thought I saw it twitch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Sanity Check said:

It would be one thing if Frazier was hitting like Odor last year.  He's not.  Clearly, folks just want the new shiny toys from Norfolk up here and assume they will be as good as Frazier.  There are no guarantees.  And, much of this is emotional, and it's a gamble to go from a known major league commodity to the "hope" and "promise" of someone performing well at AAA.

At the end of the day, I WANT Frazier to perform well enough that some other team finds real value in him at the deadline, and we can deal from a position of strength and maybe get some decent minor league talent back.  I don't ever see Frazier being part of a deal that brings us an ace, but maybe a player or two to develop while we promote an Ortiz for good, or a Westburg.  

In the meantime, I'll take his contributions to our current success, and we should all be happy with that.

The O's aren't getting anything valuable for Frazier.  He is who he is.  A marginal mlb bat who is limited defensively.  If the O's picked up the majority of his contract, they might get an average farm system's 25th best prospect.  Who knows, that prospect might turn into a really valuable arm, so it's worth it for a lottery ticket.  Sometimes the lottery ticket hits, just look at Cano.  Getting Cano is like spending $5 on the mega millions and winning.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

The O's aren't getting anything valuable for Frazier.  He is who he is.  A marginal mlb bat who is limited defensively.  If the O's picked up the majority of his contract, they might get an average farm system's 25th best prospect.  Who knows, that prospect might turn into a really valuable arm, so it's worth it for a lottery ticket.  Sometimes the lottery ticket hits, just look at Cano.  Getting Cano is like spending $5 on the mega millions and winning.

And we haven't even scratched the Povich ticket yet... (And don't completely sleep on Rojas and Nunez)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Sanity Check said:

Well, he's here.  If what you're saying is true.....and assuming he continues to bring value to our team, what would you do at the deadline?  Keep him and keep the kids on the farm?  Trade him for no value?  Or, cut him to make room for one of the AAA guys?  Those are your choices if you can't/won't get "anything" for him.

So, as GM, what's your move??

Well, I don’t believe in him long term (long term meaning the course of the season).

He had a better first half in 2021 and then crapped the bed.  
 

But I think he has value in that pinch hitter, play every once in a while role…and I think that role will provide more value to the team than what he will get in trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Well, I don’t believe in him long term (long term meaning the course of the season).

He had a better first half in 2021 and then crapped the bed.  
 

But I think he has value in that pinch hitter, play every once in a while role…and I think that role will provide more value to the team than what he will get in trade.

You think that's worth a roster spot that could be used to prep an everyday guy for a pennant run?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pickles said:

Just to be clear, you don't have anything supporting this position but your feels.

Just to be clear,  if you are referring to our thoughts on if Westburg would outperform or match Frazier, the same applies to your position.  You feel he wouldn't...I feel he would.  Neither of us can prove ourselves right or wrong. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
    • Elias needs to use better judgement when he dumpster dives, prepare better for the high percentage chance that his dumpster diving pickups will fail, and increase usage of other means to get pieces. Bullpen usage is another problem, but it’s hard to effectively juggle flaming torches. A wrong move burns badly 
    • I can see the case for Mountcastle based on defense alone, but what has Kjerstad done to warrant that kind of treatment? Is it the .505 OPS he’s put up since coming back? The overall .438 ML OPS since getting hit in the head? I’m as bummed as anyone that his season got derailed, but if you’re talking about where they are right now — he’s not your huckleberry. As for O’Hearn, he’s 8 for his last 23 (.348), with 3 doubles. That feels a little like the “getting himself together” that you referenced. He had an awful month-long slump, but he also has an extended track record (over 1.5 seasons) of excelling in the role he’s now back in, as the platoon LH 1B/DH guy. He had a 125 wRC+ in those 750 PAs as an Oriole until 8/20, which is roughly when Mountcastle went out.  I’d be good with Kjerstad DHing against LH starters, because there’s good reason to think he hits them better than O’Hearn. And if they want to play both O’Hearn and Kjerstad against some RHPs, in order to set up the potential of Mountcastle coming in to PH against a lefty reliever, I’m down for that too. But the primary alignment is going to (and should) be the Mountcastle/O’Hearn duo we’ve gotten accustomed to seeing.
    • The Achilles heel for this team is going to be the unit that doesn't step up in the postseason. I can easily see scenarios where: the bullpen is hot and provides good performances but the offense sputters and isn't clutch the offense comes up big but the bullpen blows games late starting pitching tosses some clunkers (not really likely with Burnes and Eflin) and they can't recover the defense sucks and gives opponents extra outs to work with, blowing games open when the bullpen or SP would have been able to escape and continue We've seen all of these units falter at one point or another during this season.  We've also seen all of these units perform very well at different times throughout the season.  So, we'll see what turns out to be the Achilles heel for the Orioles in the playoffs starting next week.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...