Jump to content

Adam Frazier 2023


Frobby

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

IMO Frazier's value is that he gives us a viable replacement should we trade players of real value, like Urias, Mateo, and Santander.

Clearly Mike knows how to construct a roster, the sum is greater than the parts, especially in Frazier's case

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, 25 Nuggets said:

I know Vavra had a big base hit, but I'd feel more comfortable with Frazier in that role and Westburg (or Urias) playing 2B.

Yep. Ultimately, that’s the best set up for us. I’m glad Frazier is on a heater right now but his OPS was 100 points lower a week ago. You play the guys when they are on a heater but ultimately, he’s a sub 700 OPS guy with declining defense and no speed.

But his bat to ball skills have value for us in certain situations. I wouldn’t care if they DFA’d him tomorrow but I also don’t care if he’s here the rest of the year if he keeps up some semblance of an offensive profile that can help us in a limited role.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Yep. Ultimately, that’s the best set up for us. I’m glad Frazier is on a heater right now but his OPS was 100 points lower a week ago. You play the guys when they are on a heater but ultimately, he’s a sub 700 OPS guy with declining defense and no speed.

But his bat to ball skills have value for us in certain situations. I wouldn’t care if they DFA’d him tomorrow but I also don’t care if he’s here the rest of the year if he keeps up some semblance of an offensive profile that can help us in a limited role.

We've been through this before. He is a .729 hitter for his career. Too early to declare him done. If you want to be accurate please use past tense and the cherry picked time period that supports the claim. I wanted Westburg on opening day and still don't like the signing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

We've been through this before. He is a .729 hitter for his career. Too early to declare him done. If you want to be accurate please use past tense and the cherry picked time period that supports the claim. I wanted Westburg on opening day and still don't like the signing.

His last 1200 at bats is a sub 650 OPs guy. That is way more relevant to career numbers at his age and at this point in his career.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

His last 1200 at bats is a sub 650 OPs guy. That is way more relevant to career numbers at his age and at this point in his career.

I don't think that's right.

Last 135 he's .740

730 before that call .650.

400 before that he was over .800.

There's no way that averages out to .650. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

I don't think that's right.

Last 135 he's .740

730 before that call .650.

400 before that he was over .800.

There's no way that averages out to .650. 

It’s not. In his last 1210 plate appearances, his OPS is .679. His WRC+ is 94.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

I don't think that's right.

Last 135 he's .740

730 before that call .650.

400 before that he was over .800.

There's no way that averages out to .650. 

I misspoke..it shouldn’t be 1200 at bats.  It should be about 1000 at bats.

The 800 at bats coming into this season since the second half of 2021, his OPS was like 620ish. So, in the last 1000 at bats, it’s probably 650ish or less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, forphase1 said:

Just to be clear,  if you are referring to our thoughts on if Westburg would outperform or match Frazier, the same applies to your position.  You feel he wouldn't...I feel he would.  Neither of us can prove ourselves right or wrong. 

Yeah, but the burden of proof isn't on my position.

Frazier's already here and performing well.

Westburg is hypothetically able to do that.  And there's plenty of evidence to suggest it wouldn't be seamless at least.

Furthermore, that still isn't an argument against Frazier, because Frazier has been our second best and most consistent infielder this year.  If Westburg is up here taking anybody's playing time it should probably be Henderson's and Mountcastle's tbh.

This team is better because Frazier is on it.  Simple as.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Pickles said:

Yeah, but the burden of proof isn't on my position.

Frazier's already here and performing well.

Westburg is hypothetically able to do that.  And there's plenty of evidence to suggest it wouldn't be seamless at least.

Furthermore, that still isn't an argument against Frazier, because Frazier has been our second best and most consistent infielder this year.  If Westburg is up here taking anybody's playing time it should probably be Henderson's and Mountcastle's tbh.

This team is better because Frazier is on it.  Simple as.

It’s not that simple because you don’t know what his replacement would be doing. If we had never signed Frazier, one of the young players would be getting his at bats and playing time and we don’t know what that player would be doing. We don’t know if that players likely improved defense would have impacted the pitching more. Lots of factors here.

We are better with him vs Odor, there’s no doubt about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

It’s not that simple because you don’t know what his replacement would be doing. If we had never signed Frazier, one of the young players would be getting his at bats and playing time and we don’t know what that player would be doing. We don’t know if that players likely improved defense would have impacted the pitching more. Lots of factors here.

We are better with him vs Odor, there’s no doubt about that.

Even if Westburg can outperform Frazier, he should be taking ABs from Henderson and Mountcastle.  Because guess what?  They can't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Pickles said:

Yeah, but the burden of proof isn't on my position.

Frazier's already here and performing well.

Westburg is hypothetically able to do that.  And there's plenty of evidence to suggest it wouldn't be seamless at least.

Furthermore, that still isn't an argument against Frazier, because Frazier has been our second best and most consistent infielder this year.  If Westburg is up here taking anybody's playing time it should probably be Henderson's and Mountcastle's tbh.

This team is better because Frazier is on it.  Simple as.

In March/April Frazier had a .663 OPS in 91 PA's

In May Frazier has a .844 OPS in 54 PA's

On the year Frazier has a .568 OPS with RISP

I think it's fair to say Frazier has been on a heater in May. And that it benefited the team.

It think it's also fair to say he sucked in March/April... and that he's not exactly clutch in either case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, owknows said:

In March/April Frazier had a .663 OPS in 91 PA's

In May Frazier has a .844 OPS in 54 PA's

On the year Frazier has a .568 OPS with RISP

I think it's fair to say Frazier has been on a heater in May. And that it benefited the team.

It think it's also fair to say he sucked in March/April... and that he's not exactly clutch in either case.

If you have to resort to RISP numbers, I have to say you don't have a very strong argument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Pickles said:

If you have to resort to RISP numbers, I have to say you don't have a very strong argument.

If you have to ignore the majority of what I posted to focus on the one mention of RISP... you have no argument at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...