Jump to content

I can't get over how much Angelos has killed off the fanbase


Greenpastures23

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

You picked a great year to start.

I was 12 and all my friends were excited about them. My dad doesn't care for professional sports, so I had to figure out my own fandom. The next two years should have told me what I was signing up for. 😁

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, interloper said:

Lol alright wise guy. 35-37*

It's perfectly possible for someone to be 35 at the start of a baseball season and 38 at the end of the season two seasons in the future.

I wouldn't be able to do it, but nearly half the population could.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, interloper said:

For me the tanking years were actually kind of fun. I enjoyed watching the new Elias process unfold. The prospects were actually worth following in the minors. High draft picks were exciting. Getting into the international side for the first time in forever. 

Yeah the tanking seasons got me more into baseball than I ever had been before. I’ve followed the NFL draft fairly religiously since the ravens arrived in 1996, but never cared or paid any attention to the MLB draft or our minor league teams until now. Right now, I hardly even care about what’s going on with Lamar and the ravens, or the NFL draft because I’m so focused on the O’s. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RarityFlaherty said:

Yeah the tanking seasons got me more into baseball than I ever had been before. I’ve followed the NFL draft fairly religiously since the ravens arrived in 1996, but never cared or paid any attention to the MLB draft or our minor league teams until now. Right now, I hardly even care about what’s going on with Lamar and the ravens, or the NFL draft because I’m so focused on the O’s. 

Totally - same!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SteveA said:

It's perfectly possible for someone to be 35 at the start of a baseball season and 38 at the end of the season two seasons in the future.

I wouldn't be able to do it, but nearly half the population could.

Baseball age is determined on a set date.  A season is either your age 35 season or your age 36 season.  So while biologically it is possible it isn't possible as MLB records age.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Pickles said:

TBH, if it doesn't, I'd fear the long term and non-baseball effects on attendance are stronger than we may be willing to acknowledge.  

Fanduel & all the other betting non-sense will have the fan base broke by the time they are able Compete.  What betting in sports is doing to everything is sickening. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

That's not true.

They had many plans over those twenty years.

They just weren't good plans for the most part.

Jury is still out on exactly what the current plan is or how successful it will be.

Even if it fails gloriously, I’ve had a lot more fun attending affiliate games the last 3 years than ever before 😅

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

Fanduel & all the other betting non-sense will have the fan base broke by the time they are able Compete.  What betting in sports is doing to everything is sickening. 

Ha!  Well, I won't rant in two threads, but in the thread about the new scoreboard, I made my feelings known regarding gambling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
    • Elias needs to use better judgement when he dumpster dives, prepare better for the high percentage chance that his dumpster diving pickups will fail, and increase usage of other means to get pieces. Bullpen usage is another problem, but it’s hard to effectively juggle flaming torches. A wrong move burns badly 
    • I can see the case for Mountcastle based on defense alone, but what has Kjerstad done to warrant that kind of treatment? Is it the .505 OPS he’s put up since coming back? The overall .438 ML OPS since getting hit in the head? I’m as bummed as anyone that his season got derailed, but if you’re talking about where they are right now — he’s not your huckleberry. As for O’Hearn, he’s 8 for his last 23 (.348), with 3 doubles. That feels a little like the “getting himself together” that you referenced. He had an awful month-long slump, but he also has an extended track record (over 1.5 seasons) of excelling in the role he’s now back in, as the platoon LH 1B/DH guy. He had a 125 wRC+ in those 750 PAs as an Oriole until 8/20, which is roughly when Mountcastle went out.  I’d be good with Kjerstad DHing against LH starters, because there’s good reason to think he hits them better than O’Hearn. And if they want to play both O’Hearn and Kjerstad against some RHPs, in order to set up the potential of Mountcastle coming in to PH against a lefty reliever, I’m down for that too. But the primary alignment is going to (and should) be the Mountcastle/O’Hearn duo we’ve gotten accustomed to seeing.
    • The Achilles heel for this team is going to be the unit that doesn't step up in the postseason. I can easily see scenarios where: the bullpen is hot and provides good performances but the offense sputters and isn't clutch the offense comes up big but the bullpen blows games late starting pitching tosses some clunkers (not really likely with Burnes and Eflin) and they can't recover the defense sucks and gives opponents extra outs to work with, blowing games open when the bullpen or SP would have been able to escape and continue We've seen all of these units falter at one point or another during this season.  We've also seen all of these units perform very well at different times throughout the season.  So, we'll see what turns out to be the Achilles heel for the Orioles in the playoffs starting next week.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...