Jump to content

I can't get over how much Angelos has killed off the fanbase


Greenpastures23

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Pickles said:

To me it's not really about the increase.  It's about the total number.

If we're saying it's going to take several years of winning to get to 2 million fans than we're in esscence saying that is the ceiling of our potential attendance.

That used to be the floor.  That's problematic.

In addition to the success or failure of the team, the following factors have come into play in the last 20 years:

1.  Washington got a team.   

2.  The 2015 riots hurt Baltimore’s reputation as a safe place to visit.  

3.  COVID interrupted a season, and kept people away from ballparks for a full year.  Some of those people may not come back.  

Those are all factors that lower the ceiling and the floor of what we can expect.  But I still think that the ceiling is higher than 2 mm, with a few years of winning.


 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

In addition to the success or failure of the team, the following factors have come into play in the last 20 years:

1.  Washington got a team.   

2.  The 2015 riots hurt Baltimore’s reputation as a safe place to visit.  

3.  COVID interrupted a season, and kept people away from ballparks for a full year.  Some of those people may not come back.  

Those are all factors that lower the ceiling and the floor of what we can expect.  But I still think that the ceiling is higher than 2 mm, with a few years of winning.


 

I also think the long-term demographic decline of baseball is a factor as well, and might in the end be the biggest.  Baseball is far behind as a the third most popular sport with the younger generations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, emmett16 said:

Fanduel & all the other betting non-sense will have the fan base broke by the time they are able Compete.  What betting in sports is doing to everything is sickening. 

I thought I was in the minority on this one, but I agree 100%. If you need to bet on a game to enjoy/watch it them you should probably find another hobby. It also seems ridiculously hypocryitcal considering how long MLB and the other leagues turned up their noses at gambling until they had a chance to make a buck. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

In addition to the success or failure of the team, the following factors have come into play in the last 20 years:

1.  Washington got a team.   

2.  The 2015 riots hurt Baltimore’s reputation as a safe place to visit.  

3.  COVID interrupted a season, and kept people away from ballparks for a full year.  Some of those people may not come back.  

Those are all factors that lower the ceiling and the floor of what we can expect.  But I still think that the ceiling is higher than 2 mm, with a few years of winning.


 

I think the vast majority of people don't even think of or rememeber the 2015 riots, unless they're trying to make a point about how unsafe the City is. It's just low hanging fruit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Pickles said:

I guess that's kind of my point/concern.  This team drew over 2 million in 2007 after nine straight losing seasons.  They topped 2 million in 2012 after 14 consecutive losing seasons.

If they can't get to 2 million this year then the team's fanbase has been permanently reduced in a way that even winning won't solve.

 This is an unbelievably great point. This should be absolutely frightening to anyone in the warehouse when put in this context. What has gone on the last few yrs pales in comparison to that era. Not even remotely similar actually. And they STILL pulled 2m! I honestly wonder if they could ever pull 2m again. EVER. They have infinitely more things working against them now then they did in 2007 even though this "shouldn't" be a worse situation as far as recent team success goes. Outside of that when you factor in population decline, the general state of the city and downtown in general, economy, home experience improvement......at least off the field it is looking pretty bleak when it comes to attendance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is the interview mentioned above.

https://www.audacy.com/podcast/inside-access-with-jason-lacanfora-and-ken-weinman-8804a/episodes/john-angelos-joined-inside-access-e3dba

He's trashing the Sun and he's not going to open the books. He didn't come right out and say he wasn't, but based on his answers, he's not going to.

Edited by spleen1015
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I gotta say as a person from the area who grew up a die hard Orioles fan and have been one for most of my life (I'm in my 40's now). 

The Angelos family has really zapped much of my passion. It's like how many times can Charlie Brown have the football pulled by Lucy before he realizes "maybe I shouldn't keep trying to kick it?"

After this past offseason (the inactivity combine with the lies/unkept promises) it really had an adverse effect on my passion for the team. It's almost like I'm telling myself not to get too invested anymore because "you know in the end, the Angelos family will only do something to pull the rug from under you".

I think it's not very realistic to think all the Orioles have to do is have a good young team and be around .500 and fans should just come pouring in. The brand has burned a heck of a lot of bridges in the community. And I'm afraid that many people have moved on or are consuming sports differently. There is much data to suggest that much of Gens Y and Z do not even watch/consume live sports.

Another thing to consider - If you think the public will always maintain a certain relationship with how they interact with certain industries, I think post-pandemic that has not proven to be the case.

Just take a look at movie attendance before and after or look at church attendance (live) pre and post-pandemic. Things have changed for many industries, why should professional sports be any different?

Edited by Bemorewins
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
    • Elias needs to use better judgement when he dumpster dives, prepare better for the high percentage chance that his dumpster diving pickups will fail, and increase usage of other means to get pieces. Bullpen usage is another problem, but it’s hard to effectively juggle flaming torches. A wrong move burns badly 
    • I can see the case for Mountcastle based on defense alone, but what has Kjerstad done to warrant that kind of treatment? Is it the .505 OPS he’s put up since coming back? The overall .438 ML OPS since getting hit in the head? I’m as bummed as anyone that his season got derailed, but if you’re talking about where they are right now — he’s not your huckleberry. As for O’Hearn, he’s 8 for his last 23 (.348), with 3 doubles. That feels a little like the “getting himself together” that you referenced. He had an awful month-long slump, but he also has an extended track record (over 1.5 seasons) of excelling in the role he’s now back in, as the platoon LH 1B/DH guy. He had a 125 wRC+ in those 750 PAs as an Oriole until 8/20, which is roughly when Mountcastle went out.  I’d be good with Kjerstad DHing against LH starters, because there’s good reason to think he hits them better than O’Hearn. And if they want to play both O’Hearn and Kjerstad against some RHPs, in order to set up the potential of Mountcastle coming in to PH against a lefty reliever, I’m down for that too. But the primary alignment is going to (and should) be the Mountcastle/O’Hearn duo we’ve gotten accustomed to seeing.
    • The Achilles heel for this team is going to be the unit that doesn't step up in the postseason. I can easily see scenarios where: the bullpen is hot and provides good performances but the offense sputters and isn't clutch the offense comes up big but the bullpen blows games late starting pitching tosses some clunkers (not really likely with Burnes and Eflin) and they can't recover the defense sucks and gives opponents extra outs to work with, blowing games open when the bullpen or SP would have been able to escape and continue We've seen all of these units falter at one point or another during this season.  We've also seen all of these units perform very well at different times throughout the season.  So, we'll see what turns out to be the Achilles heel for the Orioles in the playoffs starting next week.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...