Jump to content

Opening Day 1983


fansince1988

Recommended Posts

38 minutes ago, Going Underground said:

The 1980's had many of the same issues we have now. We always look back and say they were better times 

We didn't have social media, cell phones and kids played outside.  Those would be the positives from looking back.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Their greatest teams (1969-71) could barely draw 1 million fans.  The teams beginning in 1977 really captured the fans’ imagination because the free agency period had begun and the team competed so well against the Yankees and Red Sox despite the obvious economic disadvantages.  Those were seen as really blue collar teams that fit Baltimore’s self-image to a T.  Of course, it didn’t hurt that Washington had lost its team after ‘71 and Tom Boswell began covering the O’s in the Post on a daily basis and helped convert a lot of DC-area fans into Orioles fans with his eloquent coverage of the team.  

No football team also helped attendance  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

Yep.  I'm just saying the special place in the fabric stuff is a bit rose tinted with history.

 

Not in my opinion.  There’s more to it than fan attendance.  The long term success of the Orioles in that era was a huge source of civic pride.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, drdelaware said:

We didn't have social media, cell phones and kids played outside.  Those would be the positives from looking back.

Ahh the good old days, be 12 tell your folks you are going out at 10 AM, spend the day smoking and drinking in the woods and show up at 6 for dinner.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Going Underground said:

Also not pc.

Why is that?  It’s like commenting on a male broadcaster’s sports coat or bad toupee.  I consider myself pretty circumspect when it comes to these issues, but a bad makeup job is where I draw the line!  

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Going Underground said:

I know but it made attendance even higher. The Orioles were not happy when the Ravens arrived.

I’ve always been dubious that the football team has much impact on attendance for the baseball team.  I’m not saying it’s zero, but I don’t think it’s much.  It might impact the luxury box sales though.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

Why is that?  It’s like commenting on a male broadcaster’s sports coat or bad toupee.  I consider myself pretty circumspect when it comes to these issues, but a bad makeup job is where I draw the line!  

I was just byb,all good. I filled out an appointment at Quest online.Took me an hour to figure out what I was,so many choices. Somewhere between animal or mineral with a plant based compound.  I guess like Cousin It. 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, drdelaware said:

We didn't have social media, cell phones and kids played outside.  Those would be the positives from looking back.

Agree with all of this.  I also (honestly) miss the lack of analytics.  It was more fun for me to watch baseball when I knew much less.  Basic stats were all I really needed, along with a few clutch moments to stick in my memory.  Seems like we can pick just about any player apart based on some advanced metric.  I know I am in the minority on this one, but other than helping some deserving players get into the HOF, I could do without all of the modern analytics.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Still with a chance to do this for the first time since 1982-83. Would be one more nice accomplishment for this organization. 
    • The weird thing about our bullpen is that they rarely blow leads.   They have a 69% save rate, 4th highest in baseball.  They make it scary, but generally, when they have the lead, they get the job done.   Where they are really bad is keeping games close when we’re down a run or two, last night being a classic example of that.   This year’s team has 32 comeback wins, compared to 48 last year.   Why is that?   Part of it is obviously on the offense, but part of it is that the bullpen doesn’t keep us in striking distance when we’re behind.   One way you can tell this is by the W/L records of the starters and the bullpen.  Last year, the starters were 57-40, this year they’re 60-49.   The starter got the decision 12 more times this year than last year, including 9 more losses (with 3 games to play).   That tells you that when the team is losing when the starter is pulled, they keep losing.  Meanwhile, the relievers were 44-21 last year, 28-22 now. They’re not picking up wins because they don’t give the offense a chance to catch up and get the win for the bullpen guy.    
    • I do not disagree with above posts.  Also I am pretty sure that this time last season, the Texas Rangers Hangout was saying the exact same things as the Rangers Pen.  Point being, you never know until you know.  The pen is shaky, but is capable of putting together a solid run from time to time.  
    • Roster Resource thinks it has tonight's lineup and Kjerstad on bench again. He is 7 AB shy of 130 MLB regular season AB with 3 games left, and if he ends up short some prospect list makers may still label him one.    If still with the Orioles, he will be 26 years old by Sarasota. I think the OP has its answer as it has been Cole and Lopez these two nights and the team is preparing for that intensity.
    • I care I bet the over on 88 wins, looked like a lock now not so much, come on O’s, daddy needs some new shoes
    • I’d have brought up Young immediately after DFAing Kimbrel. Baker has no place on this club this year. Would have been nice to see Young up here.
    • Yeah, but they could've brought him up a month ago and seen what they might have...And Im not "pining" for Brandon Young, just wondering if he's any better than some we have in the pen..
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...