Jump to content

Creed Willems 2023


Frobby

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

I get it but he was hot garbage last year and I’m not sure you ignore that because of a really hot 3 week stretch. 
 

If he was merely ok last year, I would agree but he was terrible.

Now, like I said, if he is still doing this in 2 weeks or so, you have to make the change.

 

I'm trying to figure out how much you want to discount his bad performance because he was almost 2 years under the league average age.  He's still almost a year under.  Holliday only got a cup of coffee in lo-A and held his own, but as bad as Willems was he did OPS over .800 in August, so he clearly started to figure things out.

Holliday was hitting against high schoolers when Willems was going to bat against pros.  The fact that he failed spectacularly at first shouldn't be held too hard against him IMO, considering his age, and the fact that he has clearly adjusted and improved.

I'm not saying you discount it entirely, but in my eyes he should at least get some benefit of the doubt on his current performance.

Edited by Hallas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Hallas said:

 

I'm trying to figure out how much you want to discount his bad performance because he was almost 2 years under the league average age.  He's still almost a year under.  Holliday only got a cup of coffee in lo-A and held his own, but as bad as Willems was he did OPS over .800 in August, so he clearly started to figure things out.

Holliday was hitting against high schoolers when Willems was going to bat against pros.  The fact that he failed spectacularly at first shouldn't be held too hard against him IMO, considering his age, and the fact that he has clearly adjusted and improved.

I'm not saying you discount it entirely, but in my eyes he should at least get some benefit of the doubt on his current performance.

Holliday is on a completely different level in terms of talent, advanced skills, etc…

Who Willems was playing against last year is irrelevant. He had a 585 OPS and while you point out his August stats, he also ended the year 7-30.

He has to do a lot more to get moving plus I think he’s hurt right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Holliday is on a completely different level in terms of talent, advanced skills, etc…

Who Willems was playing against last year is irrelevant. He had a 585 OPS and while you point out his August stats, he also ended the year 7-30.

He has to do a lot more to get moving plus I think he’s hurt right now.

 

I don't disagree with Holliday's promotion, it's well deserved and you're right that he as loads more talent.  I do think that Holliday was given only a brief chance to fail because he only spent 2 weeks in Delmarva, and I don't think that Willems at this juncture needs to prove more than Holliday.  If he spent another year, or even half a year, languishing in low-A I'd be more inclined to agree with you.  In general I don't think that "talent" or "pedigree" should dictate promotions anyway.

 

That said, we don't have access to statcast data for the low minors, so if there's something in the batted ball data that says that Willems is doing something worse than Holliday I'd buy that.

Edited by Hallas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Willems absolutely has to prove more.

Holliday was the first pick of the draft. An advanced HS bat that received a large signing bonus.

He went to ST and held his own vs pros.

Obviously the Os agree that Willems has more to prove as well although maybe he is hurt more than we know.

Edited by Sports Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Willems hit his 5th HR.  BA .422 OPS 1.349.  I think Basalllo competition is doing him a world of good.  The stroke looks good.  Compact, short, and powerful.  He’s using the whole field. 
 

.77 BB/K rate up from .20 last season.  Only 41 ABs, but all trends looking good. 

Edited by emmett16
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

Willems hit his 5th HR.  BA .409 OPS 1.337.  I think Basalllo competition is doing him a works of good.  The strike looks good.  Compact, short, and powerful.  He’s using the whole field. 
 

.77 BB/K rate up from .20 last season.  Only 41 ABs, but all tended looking good. 

Kenny Powers GIF

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

Another laser up the middle for a 3 hit game.  The man looks uber confident at the plate.  Love the mojo.  Consider me a fan.  

This deserves an even more appropriate Kenny Powers GIF:
kenny-powers-eastbound-and-down.gif

Edited by yark14
  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/26/2023 at 4:15 PM, Frobby said:

We’re not seriously mentioning Willems in the same breath as Holliday, are we?  I’m glad Willems is off to a good start, but he’d need a couple of really good months before any promotion can be considered.  

Keep dissing Willems.  It’s working.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Keep dissing Willems.  It’s working.

Glad to be of service.  I think what’s making me happiest about Willems so far is that he’s hitting for average.  I knew he had power, so I’m not shocked at him getting hot enough to hit 5 homers in 3 weeks.  But he’s getting a lot of other hits and his K rate is only 18.2%.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Glad to be of service.  I think what’s making me happiest about Willems so far is that he’s hitting for average.  I knew he had power, so I’m not shocked at him getting hot enough to hit 5 homers in 3 weeks.  But he’s getting a lot of other hits and his K rate is only 18.2%.  

He’s been hitting, the k rate is down, and he looks like he knows he’s going to do damage every time he steps on the box.  He’s full of moxy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Santander does exactly ONE thing very well: Hit HRs He doesn't hit for average, he doesn't get on base, he's a very slow runner, and he is a very poor defender. If he stops hitting HRs so often, his value completely evaporates and his contract basically becomes dead money, and the Orioles cannot afford to eat large amounts of dead money like the Dodgers, Mets, and Yankees of the world. I am simply using Trumbo, whose basic tool kit is very similar to Santander's, as a fairly recent, Orioles-related cautionary tale. Trumbo had his big walk year with the Orioles at age 30 and instead of doing the smart, obvious thing and taking the free draft pick, we gave him a big money extension that everyone except the FO knew was probably going to end poorly. Baseball Savant has Santander in the 22nd percentile in terms of overall fielding value. However you want to slice it, he isn't going to make up any lost value from declining offense with his defense. If his ability to slug goes south, the whole contract goes with it, because he has no other tools to make up for that with.
    • Santander is -2 OAA this year. He’s averagish to below average. There but there are much worse defensive right fielders such as Adolis Garcia and Castellanos -9, Lane Thomas and Renfroe -8, and Soto -4. Acuna and Tatis are also -2 OAA.  In 2016, Mark Trumbo was -15 OAA. They’re not even in the same universe.
    • Anthony Santander (age 27-29): .245 / .317 / .477 / .794    124 OPS+   9.0 rWAR Mark Trumbo (age 27-29): .244 / .299 / .443 / .742   105 OPS+  2.6 rWAR Is it really very meaningful that Trumbo was the better player when they were significantly younger? 29-year-old Santander is a better player by miles than Trumbo at the same age, and he has been for years. I think that’s what matters most to how you’d project them over the next few years.
    • I love Tony and I honestly think we are gonna miss his veteran leadership as much as anything. I’m very happy we have him for this year. But I do think he’d be a bad long term investment. 
    • He’s the best player in history. No one can convince me otherwise.  I didn’t say he has the most records or the most counting stats or the most MVPs. That’s not what I said.  He’s just the best player in baseball history. 
    • Trumbo was a DH impersonating a fielder, Santander is just a very poor fielder. It's not a perfect comp (is there really even such a thing?) but he is an absolutely relevant comp for this team in this situation. He is the poster child for why taking the draft pick and moving on is the right choice. And Santander is still a bad fielder, just not quite Trumbo-tier.
    • To this end I feel like we always had a pretty short leash with him. From the first three starts as an oriole to the yo-yo-ing this year. I would have preferred we just left him in the #5 starter role and see what happened. And maybe he’ll get that opportunity elsewhere like you said, whereas here it always seemed like his role was changing. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...