Jump to content

Adrian Gonzalez - Potential Trade Target?


wildbillhiccup

Recommended Posts

If you read between the lines of this post Gonzalez is one of the only big salary players the Pads have without a no trade clause. If ownership is really that concerned with meeting a targeted payroll cap, then maybe they would entertain moving him. Thoughts? Would it be worth parting with one of our young stud pitchers and someone like Scott for Gonzalez? Call me crazy, but I'd even consider taking on Young's salary if that's what it takes to land Gonzalez. Maybe we've been targeting the wrong guy (Greene) from teh Pads all along...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

The San Diego Union Tribune reports that "the Padres apparently need to trade a high-salaried player either before or during the season ... to meet the $40 million payroll mandated by club chairman John Moores."

The team is currently about $5 million over budget and Jake Peavy, Brian Giles, Adrian Gonzalez and Chris Young are the only Padres making over $3 million. Peavy and Giles both have no-trade clauses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 175
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Very intriguing that they list Gonzalez. I'd definitely go after him. I'd be really hesitant to give up one of the big three, but I'd package Erbe and Scott with others and see where that goes.

I mentioned Young as a potential target earlier in the off-season. I wouldn't be opposed to him. If we brought back Ripken and Minor, we'd have a good hoops team :scratchchinhmm:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very intriguing that they list Gonzalez. I'd definitely go after him. I'd be really hesitant to give up one of the big three, but I'd package Erbe and Scott with others and see where that goes.

I mentioned Young as a potential target earlier in the off-season. I wouldn't be opposed to him. If we brought back Ripken and Minor, we'd have a good hoops team :scratchchinhmm:

You might be hesitant to give up one of the big three, but that's what it would take. No chance Erbe/Scott gets it done IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AGon will take a Bedard like deal and I don't think we have the spare parts to make that happen.

I'm not so sure. the Pads backs are up against the wall. The need a closer right (now that Hoffman's gone)? What about -

Tillman, Matsiuz or Arrieta

Scott

Sherrill

for

A.Gonzalez

C.Young

We get our 1b of the future (arguably as good as Teix) and veteran starter for the rotation. The Pads get a young stud, cheap OF, and potential closer. Seems like a win win for both teams based on what they're trying to accomplish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You might be hesitant to give up one of the big three, but that's what it would take. No chance Erbe/Scott gets it done IMO.

I'm not sure how desparate they are to get under $40mm in payroll, and I'm not sure how many other teams are willing to give up their prospects. You're right, it's more likely there will be a more competitive offer if one of the big 3 isn't in there, but Erbe and Scott is just a starting point (I view Erbe as the best pitching prospect outside the big 3). You'd definitely would have to add significant pieces for them to return a call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not so sure. the Pads backs are up against the wall. The need a closer right (now that Hoffman's gone)? What about -

Tillman, Matsiuz or Arrieta

Scott

Sherrill

for

A.Gonzalez

C.Young

We get our 1b of the future (arguably as good as Teix) and veteran starter for the rotation. The Pads get a young stud, cheap OF, and potential closer. Seems like a win win for both teams based on what they're trying to accomplish.

Since he's a FA in 2011, I don't think I could part with that much talent for 3 years of AGon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gonzalez is a FA in a few years and he is a Boras client, so he isn't likely to extend before he hits FA.

So, trading a bunch for him in years where we are unlikely to compete is a bad move for us.

A team like Anaheim should get him.

What year is that? Is it 2011? I'd still go after him, if you can still keep the big 3 together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gonzalez has 3 years and $13.25M left on his deal, less than $4.5M a year on average. He's a great player making nearly nothing. He's not the guy they'll look to trade.

Peavy makes $8.5M this year and will shoot up to $15M and higher in the coming years. He's the one they trade. They'll take less for Peavy before they decide to move Gonzalez.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since he's a FA in 2011, I don't think I could part with that much talent for 3 years of AGon.

Keep in mind you are likely to get back two draft picks when he walks. So it's three years of production and two draft picks.

Getting Gonzalez could speed up the rebuilding timeline.

Tillman, Reimold and Rowell might be enough.

I agree though it's likely they hang on to him. It's a shame how PETCO is destroying his stats though...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, as with all of these proposed trades for established players,now is not the time to be thinking about that.If you need 6 or more players just to compete, as Baltimore does, you don't trade off multiple players to get one. A move like this will never happen any time soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Just looking at qualified batters, Cowser's K rate of 30.7% led the team by FAR.  2nd place was Mountcastle at 22.5% which is on par with the MLB average. His -2.5 Win Probability Added was also by far the worst on the team.  All of the other players on our roster (among qualified batters) were at least above average with that.  Gunnar, Westburg, and Santander were the best. He was the most "unclutch" player on our team by multiple wins according to bb-ref. I still hope he wins rookie of the year obviously but I have some serious questions about if he is a long term piece here. I suppose it's also worth pointing out that he was the 4th best player on the team in terms of overall bWAR so it's complicated.  There is no doubt he has some real defensive skills.  I just pray there is something they can do to help fix his head when he gets in these pivotal at-bats with games on the line.
    • I wonder if the ability to sign Gunnar to an extension has passed by this point.  Personally, I'd love them to sign Westburg to an extension.  I think his injury was the most impactful to team, and we can see he's one of the few players (if not the only one) who puts together professional at bats, cuts down his swing with two strikes, and appears to be cognizant of situational hitting.  He's a good athlete who should age well, and can play multiple positions competently.  He's a guy with a high floor but a high ceiling as well.  
    • Another annoying piece is that most of these games vs the Royals in the postseason going back to 2014 were essentially coin flips. And they just keep winning the coin flip.
    • Maybe their fans were spoiled by their 62 victories in playoff games, 4 pennants, and 2 world series championships over the last 10 years to the point that filling the seats for these games wasn't all that important.
    • Showalter had a 5 game playoff losing streak..by all accounts we had good culture under him.   So many intelligent fans on here yet at the same time, I wonder how many have actually watched baseball for more than 5 minutes.  Stuff happens. This team was ravaged by injuries and still found a way to 91 wins a playoff birth. Im as disappointed as anyone. I really thought we would make a run. The problem is KC was an awful matchup for us. I have no question we beat the Yankees….but I hated the matchup of KC.    The Os pitching was lights out. The BP did a good job yesterday. We got a great start from Burnes and Eflin was shaky yesterday but kept us in it.    The offense definitely had some bad luck but they also had dumb approaches in key situations. It happens. In a short series, anything can happen and unfortunately, the Os have been on the short end of that. Is that Hyde fault?  Are we really going to put that on him?  I think that’s absurd.
    • All I can say is this, I was born and raised in this community. Left for a while but moved back and have lived here for over a decade. I know that this community will not be engaged/enthusiastic/excited about running things back given how the last two seasons have ended. Look at how Ravens fans reacted to their team losing in the AFC title game.  Good luck with trying to increase season ticket sales and you don’t make changes, bring in some signings to excite the fan base for next year. Did you notice the almost apathy that set in around town regarding this team as compared to the buzz at the beginning of the season when we brought in Burnes and had a new owner. The luster/honeymoon is now over. The org is going to have to do something to reignite that fire/excitement given how the last two seasons ended.
    • Yeah, to hell with a guy who took over a dumpster fire of an organization, built up the farm system to the top system in all of MLB and resulted in a MLB team that has won 192 games over two years with most core players 26 and under (all while likely seriously hamstrung at the MLB level by the previous ownership).  The perspective, or lack thereof, on this Board is amazing.  Playoffs are a crapshoot.  But if you keep getting there, eventually the dam is going to break.  Let's see what happens this offseason with the new ownership.  If we flame out next year, then by all means it's time to start questioning the direction. But I don't expect that to happen and I think we will be right back in the playoffs. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...