Jump to content

Is it just a bad game or does Mountcastle actually suck as a firstbase?


Gurgi

Recommended Posts

Today Mountcastle looked awful.   He seems stiff and not real athletic.   How was he drafted as a SS and be this piss poor at first?  He seems to play like a 38 year old man with weight issues.   

Do we just have to deal with it?   Is his bat enough?   I remember when we put Mark Reynolds at firstbase because he had the yips and couldnt throw from third to first.  He was amazing at first.   Chris Davis was decent at first.   Mountcastle looks like a short hop is something he has never seen before.   When he was drafted as a SS and he should be better that this.  

  • Downvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Wow took all of a couple days for the harpies to start circling Mountcastle again.

Does he go around kicking puppies or something?

And why isn't this in the RANTS forum?

 

This is not a new thing for me a least.  I hear some talking about Mountcastle should of been in the discussion last year for Gold Glove.   I dont know what others are seeing but I have never liked his defense.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gurgi said:

This is not a new thing for me a least.  I hear some talking about Mountcastle should of been in the discussion last year for Gold Glove.   I dont know what others are seeing but I have never liked his defense.  

Yes I know this isn't the first time you've criticized Mountcastle.

But this is a rant and should be in the rant forum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

Yes I know this isn't the first time you've criticized Mountcastle.

But this is a rant and should be in the rant forum.

It is not a rant.  I am actually asking if someone stat minded guy can prove to me that Mountcastle actually plays good at first.  Because from my day by day watching games it does not appear he does.   I want to be wrong.  I just am asking if someone can show me how I am wrong.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Gurgi said:

It is not a rant.  I am actually asking if someone stat minded guy can prove to me that Mountcastle actually plays good at first.  Because from my day by day watching games it does not appear he does.   I want to be wrong.  I just am asking if someone can show me how I am wrong.   

You asked if he "sucked" and if he was "piss-poor".  You provided no actual evidence of anything.

You also said that Reynolds was "amazing at first" which is a statement that has no factual evidence supporting it.

That's a rant.

You think he had a poor game and you are ranting about it.

Edited by Can_of_corn
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

You asked if he "sucked" and if he was "piss-poor".  You provided no actual evidence of anything.

You also said that Reynolds was "amazing at first" which is a statement that has no factual evidence supporting it.

That's a rant.

You think he had a poor game and you are ranting about it.

You must be fun at parties.

  • Haha 2
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

As opposed to the peep calling a total stranger piss poor at something they could never dream of being able to do?

Sure.

How did  you get 100k post?  Just trolling threads?  Who made you the post police?  Why cant you just let a post you dont 100% agree with just go past?  But no....it has to be all about process and weither is the wrong forum area.   God man give it a rest.   

 

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Poor throws.

Sure the throws are not helping at all.  But Mountcastle does not seem to ever bail the infielder out.  

I am not sure I can remember a first base Oriole that looked more handcuffed on shorthop throws than Mountcastle.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • You always need shuttle guys. Ideally, I would think they’d like to have 2-3 spots they can interchange between 5-6 guys. That allows them to maybe get some younger arms in there, like McDermott and the others we mentioned already.  Bautista, if he is back to his old form, Seranthony, Cano, Soto (who I think may just surprise some people), while Cionel and Akin are not sure things. Either could be moved. They should make some moves there, IMO. Cionel has not really improved as much as I had hoped. Akin has had a very good year. Are they ARB eligible this year?
    • You’re the one who threw Ripken into the discussion.  And I don’t think anyone is necessarily saying that Gunnar will be as good as Ripken.  Cal is 3rd all time in Total Zone Runs for a SS.  But, Cal also proves that you don’t judge a SS solely on how many errors they make.  The years that Cal made 26, 25 and 25 errors, he was +11, +23, +O Rtot.  And  Gunnar is playing a solid SS now by the advanced metrics.  
    • Coby's problem is not the SSS at bats, but rather his sample size on defense, both minors and majors. He has no position at this point in his career. He's a DH and not in the lineup today because AS is Dhing. Eloy is on the bench as well. Both are PH options so stay ready. 
    • I do not know if there were extenuating circumstances or not.  Could be it's a quieter locker room without the rest of the guys, which would make sense in a concussion situation.  So, maybe I did rush to an unfair conclusion here.  At the time, I felt like it more of a "spring training look" when the starters all leave the field after they're done playing.....so yes, there could be other very reasonable explanations. I'll stand corrected, and retract my conclusion.
    • Message to Coby.....you better learn how to use a glove.
    • Totally agree.  And at no point will some people be able to admit that the shiny, new rookie may be overmatched, and putting him just because hangouters want him in there may not be the best move for team chemistry or results  People need to earn their way when given a chance, and with where we are in the standings, leashes are going to be short.  We're not the White Sox who can afford to play anyone they want because it doesn't matter.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...