Jump to content

Orioles offer BRob 3yr 30 million


33rdst

Recommended Posts

This is incredibly bizzarre. When I read and copied the article the first time they discussed how the Orioles had offered Roberts a 3 yr contract for ten million per year. When I went back to recopy the url after SG said he was having problems with the link, the article had been edited and the info on Brob was removed. I wonder if someone let the cat out of the bag too soon by mistake. This was the first time I read the length of the contract offered to Brob in any article.
There have been rumors for some time that the O's offered Roberts a 3/$30M deal. No cats have been let out. This is old news.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 192
  • Created
  • Last Reply

3/$30 mm is fine. I'd be willing to give him some incentive bonuses for being an all-star like we did with Nick. I really don't think we should offer more years or much more in guaranteed dollars.

Reviewing the terms of Nick's deal, the O's have been pretty creative in creating a structure that gives the player some upside. I wouldn't be against a structure that gives BRob some upside if he's still productive in the 3rd year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is incredibly bizzarre. When I read and copied the article the first time they discussed how the Orioles had offered Roberts a 3 yr contract for ten million per year. When I went back to recopy the url after SG said he was having problems with the link, the article had been edited and the info on Brob was removed. I wonder if someone let the cat out of the bag too soon by mistake. This was the first time I read the length of the contract offered to Brob in any article.

Maybe they pulled it because Roberts has just accepted a deal. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In this market climate how much do you think he would get as a free agent. 10 million per year? I honestly dont think he would. I think 8 million is more like it. People are saying Dunn wont get 10 million per year. You think Roberts is worth the same?

I think Roberts wants to go to a winner now. I think he probally knows he wont get more than 10 million but wants us to trade him so he can negotiate a similar contract elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What somehow got lost in the other thread about Markakis is the fact that the Orioles apparently offered Roberts a three year 30 million dollars, which Roberts has rejcected. How high would you go for Roberts?

http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/b...,5464895.story

I think the Orioles gave Roberts a decent offer. Since he declined that offer, I would ship him out of town and attempt to get back younger players in return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There have been rumors for some time that the O's offered Roberts a 3/$30M deal. No cats have been let out. This is old news.

Where were those rumors from?

The Sun reported that they had offered a multi-year deal for 10 million a year..That is the closest I have seen to any rumor about this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In this market climate how much do you think he would get as a free agent. 10 million per year? I honestly dont think he would. I think 8 million is more like it. People are saying Dunn wont get 10 million per year. You think Roberts is worth the same?

I think Roberts wants to go to a winner now. I think he probally knows he wont get more than 10 million but wants us to trade him so he can negotiate a similar contract elsewhere.

Roberts is quite a bit more valuable than Dunn.

Brob has been worth $42M over the past two years according to Fangraphs, Dunn has been worth $23.5M.

I think Roberts would have gotten over 10 million a year despite the economy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where were those rumors from?

The Sun reported that they had offered a multi-year deal for 10 million a year..That is the closest I have seen to any rumor about this.

The MLBN Hot Stove discussion last week about Roberts seemed to indicate the team was offering a three year deal, but he was looking for an additional year. That is the last I heard.

-Don

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The MLBN Hot Stove discussion last week about Roberts seemed to indicate the team was offering a three year deal, but he was looking for an additional year. That is the last I heard.

-Don

I wonder if 3 plus an option would be an acceptable compromise for Roberts...:scratchchinhmm:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the article dated Jan. 19

It also allows MacPhail to turn his focus to other issues, including the long-term status of Roberts, the two-time All-Star second baseman who will be a free agent after this coming season. The Orioles offered Roberts a three-year deal worth $30 million, according to baseball sources, but the two sides remain apart in the negotiation
Source - The Sun, Jan 19

He didn't necessarily reject the offer, but he didn't accept it either (obviously)

ETA

This is incredibly bizzarre. When I read and copied the article the first time they discussed how the Orioles had offered Roberts a 3 yr contract for ten million per year. When I went back to recopy the url after SG said he was having problems with the link, the article had been edited and the info on Brob was removed.

No mystery, the information is still there. Your link needs to be updated. (see above)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if 3 plus an option would be an acceptable compromise for Roberts...:scratchchinhmm:

Maybe if it is a player option.

What happens if a player declines his option? Would the team get the draft pick when he signs with another team? I know if a team declines a team option, they can't get the draft pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I don’t see the point. By and large, I think these extensions are very overrated by fans. I think it gives you a nice, warm and fuzzy feeling that your favorite players are locked in but for the team, unless you are getting a big discount, they don’t make a ton of sense. For a pitcher, who you have for another 4 years after this one, I don’t see it making sense unless he’s signing for real cheap. (Ie, I’m getting 2 FA years for 25M a year or less) If I’m getting that, I do it. But I think GRod has TJ surgery sometime in the next 3 years, so I’m really wary about it.
    • It's going to take a market deal at minimum and maybe even a record deal to entice them given who the agent is. But PLENTY of other young stars have extended. The Witt deal would be the comp/starting point for Gunnar.
    • Exactly. I had this same internal dialogue today, actually. He could break over the next 5 years, or he could be worthy of extending. Either way, that's not a today problem. Just let him be for now.
    • This is the kind of thing that drives me nuts about him. Every start it's like a totally different pitch mix. Or he'll get a K on a 96 mph heater up in the zone and you never see that pitch again. Or he has a guy 0-2 and chucks a random cutter down the middle. Like... throw a curve in the dirt man! 
    • This is a good question. IMO - You try with all 4 and see who's interested. Gunnar is obviously a superstar talent who is ascending at age 22. He already owns a sliver slugger and a ROY award. He also has Scott Boras for an agent. So I doubt there would be any discount on their end. Which is fine by me because we have a bilionaire owner, a growing/more engaged fanbase, who hasn't paid ANYONE in years. I.e. we should definitely have the money. I would love it if we did everything we could to make Gunnar an Oriole for at least the next 10 years. Adley is older at 25, but he arrived first. (If that matters?) Obviously at his position, you don't want to go as long with the deal. But he is closer to FA and the price will continue to go up. As the team leader, you would like for him to stick around. Burnes is probably the most valuable/most irreplaceable, in that he is the most rare commodity, an actual game #1 type starter, where no matter the matchup/opposing pitcher, we are never at a competitive disadvantage (plus he has experience). This is not to say that Grayson is not a budding ace in his own right. But you would like a few top notch pitchers to give yourself the best odds to go all the way in October. Burnes, (a healthy Bradish if such a thing is realistic), and Grayson ALONG with this lineup is a good recipe for post season success against ANY opponent (including the Dodgers or Braves). I would love to extend Holliday, but again the agent is Boras and the dad is a very wealthy former big leaguer, so there wil be no discounts there. I don't think it would be the best for team morale if we pursued an extension for Holliday first and bypassed Henderson and Rutschman. They are more accomplished players to this point. And it would be likely for them (if they were open to an extension) to harbor feelings of resentment with the rationale of "what has he done (Holliday) compared to me?"
    • The way the blue chip FA contracts are going lately is that they're only 2-3 years at a time to keep up with market value. I'd spend our ownership's money at $50m/yr to keep Burnes for 2-3 more years. Let someone else pay him in 2027 or 2028.
    • Haha I guess I see what I want to see. They did put up like 9 runs on the Red Sox in one inning with basically all singles, FWIW. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...