Jump to content

Ortiz down, Stowers up


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Aristotelian said:

 

Santander missed a few games with a back issue and has sucked ever since. I'm suspicious there is something going on.

Sure, when you have a player that isn't the designated whipping boy and they struggle it's injury.

That's a OH staple.

Santander doesn't have a history of cold streaks.

Edited by Can_of_corn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not that much has changed since Stowers’ first stint so I’m curious to see if he is actually used differently. 

Maybe the slow starts from Santander, Mountcastle, Frazier, and Henderson have prompted a bit more willingness to get those regulars more days off. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

It’s great that they are off to this great start against the worst teams in the league. 
 

The point is to do it against the best teams and be in position to make a run late in the year. This roster isn’t going to do that. There are not enough good, everyday players on it..at least not ones you can rely on.

Get the rookies up here, let them get their feet now and be ready to make a big push the second half of the year.

 

The roster is fluid.  I’m sure there will be many changes.  Just not sure the guy who wanted to acquire Paul DeJong and relegate Mateo to utility last year is the one with all of the answers and the one who determines who is an everyday player and who is not.  Cedric “I’m not a 4th outfielder” also says “hi!”

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Aristotelian said:

 

Santander missed a few games with a back issue and has sucked ever since. I'm suspicious there is something going on.

Could be a lot of things.  
 

But this isn’t unexpected. Santander is a good player but he’s not a reliable player. He has tremendous power. You like having him on the team but you don’t want to rely on him. He shouldn’t be treated like a guy who should play 150+ games a year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

 

Santander missed a few games with a back issue and has sucked ever since. I'm suspicious there is something going on.

6 for 24 with 3 doubles and 1 homer in his last 7 games.  Not great but definitely not sucking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Sure, when you have a player that isn't the designated whipping boy and they struggle it's injury.

That's a OH staple.

Santander doesn't have a history of cold streaks.

Seems like a guy who plays every day and bats 3 or 4 should be capable of producing more than 1 WAR every 500 ABs. But I guess he’s just unnecessarily maligned. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

The roster has been mismanaged into an 18-9 start.   Stowers batting cleanup today in RF and O’Hearn at DH.  I assume Santander is not 100%.  

I love the start and I love this team.  But I also have concerns about the long term handling of prospects and the roster.  

Completely agree on Santander.  He looks slow/stiff/uncomfortable at the plate, running, and in the field all season so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, waroriole said:

Seems like a guy who plays every day and bats 3 or 4 should be capable of producing more than 1 WAR every 500 ABs. But I guess he’s just unnecessarily maligned. 

Seven years in and his career OPS+ is 103.

His rWAR/AB is 1/386.

He just might not be that good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Seven years in and his career OPS+ is 103.

His rWAR/AB is 1/386.

He just might not be that good.

I was talking about Mountcastle. I agree about the just might not be that good part, for both. It’s all the more puzzling when you consider Stowers, Westburg, Cowser, Ortiz are all ready for Baltimore. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Seven years in and his career OPS+ is 103.

His rWAR/AB is 1/386.

He just might not be that good.

I really try not to get too high or low on players.   They have their hot and cold streaks.  Saying that, Santander managed to get through 2022 without putting up a month under .700 OPS, so April has been pretty disappointing.  We’ll see how May goes.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, waroriole said:

I was talking about Mountcastle. I agree about the just might not be that good part, for both. It’s all the more puzzling when you consider Stowers, Westburg, Cowser, Ortiz are all ready for Baltimore. 

I knew what you were doing.

I just find the behavior interesting.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Honestly, imagine the criticism if the team wasn’t playing well.  

There was a lot of worry over the bullpen, myself included.  They called up Cano who had all of 3 innings at Norfolk and immediately stuck him in high leverage situations.  They picked up Coulombe for virtually nothing.  The bullpen is now the strength of the team while we wait for Givens and Tate.   How’s that for gross roster mismanagement?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pickles said:

Whether the team is winning or losing, some people's primary purpose for posting is to posit they could be doing it better.

If you look at the history of these posters it’s been proven that they would be much worse.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Still with a chance to do this for the first time since 1982-83. Would be one more nice accomplishment for this organization. 
    • The weird thing about our bullpen is that they rarely blow leads.   They have a 69% save rate, 4th highest in baseball.  They make it scary, but generally, when they have the lead, they get the job done.   Where they are really bad is keeping games close when we’re down a run or two, last night being a classic example of that.   This year’s team has 32 comeback wins, compared to 48 last year.   Why is that?   Part of it is obviously on the offense, but part of it is that the bullpen doesn’t keep us in striking distance when we’re behind.   One way you can tell this is by the W/L records of the starters and the bullpen.  Last year, the starters were 57-40, this year they’re 60-49.   The starter got the decision 12 more times this year than last year, including 9 more losses (with 3 games to play).   That tells you that when the team is losing when the starter is pulled, they keep losing.  Meanwhile, the relievers were 44-21 last year, 28-22 now. They’re not picking up wins because they don’t give the offense a chance to catch up and get the win for the bullpen guy.    
    • I do not disagree with above posts.  Also I am pretty sure that this time last season, the Texas Rangers Hangout was saying the exact same things as the Rangers Pen.  Point being, you never know until you know.  The pen is shaky, but is capable of putting together a solid run from time to time.  
    • Roster Resource thinks it has tonight's lineup and Kjerstad on bench again. He is 7 AB shy of 130 MLB regular season AB with 3 games left, and if he ends up short some prospect list makers may still label him one.    If still with the Orioles, he will be 26 years old by Sarasota. I think the OP has its answer as it has been Cole and Lopez these two nights and the team is preparing for that intensity.
    • I care I bet the over on 88 wins, looked like a lock now not so much, come on O’s, daddy needs some new shoes
    • I’d have brought up Young immediately after DFAing Kimbrel. Baker has no place on this club this year. Would have been nice to see Young up here.
    • Yeah, but they could've brought him up a month ago and seen what they might have...And Im not "pining" for Brandon Young, just wondering if he's any better than some we have in the pen..
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...