Jump to content

2026 Orioles


Yossarian

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, ShoelesJoe said:

Yes. Unless MLB figures out a way to add five new positions on a diamond I don't see how we keep everybody. 

Edit: in this scenario I'd have Ortiz on the team as a utility infielder, and Fabian or Haskin as my 4th outfielder. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Just Regular said:

I'm more of a '27 Orioles dreamer.    That year has a certain in-century cache for trying to run up the ELO curve as far as a baseball team can.

I do believe Holliday mostly sets things up for the team to be a year better each time throughout the remainder of Adley's years here.

There's a fair chance Adley's prime is right now, but all the ferocious ones in his orbit are just cutting their teeth, if even that.

 ‘27 O’s against the ‘27 Yanks for a battle of the centuries!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Yossarian said:

You are correct about the Rays - they do have Wander Franco on an 11-year deal (we'll see if they hold on to him that long). They do have two others under contract pay 2025 -  Jeffrey Springs and Pete Fairbanks.

They have also extended Yandy Diaz (through 26), signed B. Lowe to a 6 year extension in 2019, extended Margot and Glasnow on 2 year deals, and signed Elfin to a 3 year deal in free agency. They have also done numerous extensions in the past, including Snell, Kiermaier, and Longoria. The idea that the Rays never retain their players beyond team control is a complete and often repeated fallacy. They might trade them after extending them, but they don’t tend to just keep their players 4-5 years then trade them before FA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sydnor said:

They have also extended Yandy Diaz (through 26), signed B. Lowe to a 6 year extension in 2019, extended Margot and Glasnow on 2 year deals, and signed Elfin to a 3 year deal in free agency. They have also done numerous extensions in the past, including Snell, Kiermaier, and Longoria. The idea that the Rays never retain their players beyond team control is a complete and often repeated fallacy. They might trade them after extending them, but they don’t tend to just keep their players 4-5 years then trade them before FA.

I'm not sure how many of those contacts were played all the way out in Tampa?  Do they sign these long- term contacts to make players more tradeable with longer team control?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Yossarian said:

I'm not sure how many of those contacts were played all the way out in Tampa?  Do they sign these long- term contacts to make players more tradeable with longer team control?

I did say they might trade them after extending them, and they often do. They traded Longoria and Snell (among others, but they didn’t trade Keiermaier likely because he had no value). If we don’t start extending players, we will be in a situation where we are trading Adley 2 years from now to get max value. Tampa doesn’t typically do that, they get valuable players signed to extensions when possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Pickles said:

Since nobody has touched on it the far more interesting question is what does the rotation look like, and the pitching staff in gneral.

G-Rod

Povich

Seth  J-O-H-N-S-O-N

Wells

Bradish

DL Hall is the shut-down closer. 

Edited by ShoelesJoe
because I'm old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Yossarian said:

This assumes guys like Norby, Wagner. Willem, Lester don't make the bigs (at least for the Orioles) and Stowers and Ortiz are dealt?

Who is Lester? Josh Lester? If so he has no business on the 2023 Orioles let alone the 2026 Orioles. 

Edited by Matt Bennett
replaced 2027 with 2026 to match the OP
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Yossarian said:

I'm not sure how many of those contacts were played all the way out in Tampa?  Do they sign these long- term contacts to make players more tradeable with longer team control?

Sometimes they trade them.  

Longoria actually signed two long term deals with Tampa.  The first, in 2008, potentially extended through 2016 if Tampa exercised its options.  The second, signed after the 2012 season, was through 2022 with an option for 2023.  He was traded after the 2017 season, having played 10 years for the Rays.  

Kiermaier signed a 6 year extension that ran 2017-22, when he had 3 years under his belt.  He played out his entire contract and became a free agent after 9 years with the Rays.  

Snell signed a five-year extension after 2018 that runs through this season.  He was traded after the 2020 season, only two years into his deal and after four full years with the team.  

So, it’s a mixed bag.  Both Longoria and Kiermaier played a long time for Tampa Bay, years beyond when they would have been eligible for free agency, even though Longoria eventually was traded after a decade with the club.  Snell was traded before he ever could have been a free agent, despite the fact that Tampa had extended him.  In any event, the Rays are not shy about locking up young players to long term deals if they believe in them.  



 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Pickles said:

Since nobody has touched on it the far more interesting question is what does the rotation look like, and the pitching staff in gneral.

I think the lineup question is by far more interesting, because there are so many players in the mix it will be interesting to see who they let go of and who they hold on to.  I thought we'd see some of those answers this past offseason, but they kicked the can down the road a little more.

The only pitcher I have any real confidence in in being here in 2026 is Grayson, if he stays healthy.  Pitching is just too un-knowable to be interesting to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Yossarian said:

You're thinking the O's fully adopt the Rays model of no long- term, legacy players and full roster turnover every three years, or so?

The Rays extended Wander Franco for 10 years.  That should show the O's ownership to extend Rutschman. If they don't extend their franchise players, their window of opportunity will close soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Oh, I'd love to have one come through our system by being drafted and developed. No doubt at all. 
    • Paging @Tony-OH to the thread.  🤣 I've actually advocated for this in the minors forums...letting other teams draft and try to develop guys to see which have a shot of sticking and which don't.  Essentially let other teams make mistakes in the draft and trade for guys that are still in the lower levels in other systems but you think have a shot.  I do believe that's part of Elias's strategy....as risk adverse as he is, he's not going to take risks on drafting pitching if he views that's the biggest risk in the draft. All I'm saying it'd be nice to have a Skubal come through our system.  Does anyone really disagree with drafting and developing a Cy Young winner or is that something you guys aren't interested in?
    • Oh, I get that. I just think you'd be hard pressed to say year in and year out the Central is anything but a mediocre division.  Typically, the AL East has at least 3 strong teams, with some seasons where 4-5 of them have winning records or close to it.  But it doesn't matter. As said before, I've been saying for weeks prior to the end of the season that the Tigers were a very good team. I just wouldn't trade our org, team, farm, whatever for the Tigers. 
    • Does it matter if they get drafted and developed vs. traded for and developed? Hell, the O's starting rotation was a strength this year. Here's a breakdown of how it was constructed: Burnes - traded for (Elias) Suarez - free agent (Elias) Kremer - traded for (Duquette) Eflin - traded for (Elias) Grayson - drafted (Duquette) Bradish - traded for (Elias) Povich - traded for (Elias) Irvin - traded for (Elias) Tyler Wells - Rule V (Elias) Rogers - traded for (Elias) McDermott - traded for (Elias) Means - drafted (Duquette) I'm excluding Bowman being an opener and getting a starting credit.  But that said, out of all of the starters that the O's used this year, none were drafted by Elias, and only 2 were drafted by the O's (GRod, Means). 8 were acquired via trade (7 by Elias, 1 by Duquette), and 2 via FA or Rule V.  I don't necessarily think that Elias needs to draft starters to build a rotation, but it would be nice to see a couple make it before being traded, TBH.  That said, I don't think the above is sustainable, but the strategy would be sustainable if you have free agency play a bigger part. Look at the Royals. Their best 3 starters weren't drafted by them (Ragans - traded for, Wacha - FA, Lugo - FA). 
    • Unfortunately, it's looking like there is a lot of truth in that statement.  I believe Steve Bisciotti (Ravens owner) once said, he wanted to have a good team every year, get into the playoffs enough, eventually things go your way and win the Super Bowl.  This was in response to playing salary cap games for a few seasons and then eventually having to pay the piper with the dead money and being uncompetitive for a few years. Hopefully the O's can be consistently good and get hot at the end of the season and make a run through the playoffs.  Go back to June 1st and the five best teams in the league were the Orioles, Yankees, Guardians, Phillies and Dodgers.  Two are already out, Guardians fading fast with the Yankees and Dodgers still alive.   A Tigers - Mets World Series would be quite fitting.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...