Jump to content

UMD DUKE Thread


Floater

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I don't think so. I'm comparing the few Terps games I watch (6 or so) to all the other college games I get to see including the other ACC teams who make it onto ESPN with greater frequency.

Do you disagree with me? :D I just don't think most of this team is talented enough to play in the ACC and when the season is done I suspect MD's conference record will prove me right. They need 9-7 to make the NCAA and I suspect they'll end up w/7 at best.

Uggh. Dukies up by 20 now w/2+ mins left in the half.

Oh, I don't disagree that this is the worst game I've watched since the UCLA tournament loss, and probably the worst Maryland team that I've watched in a decade.

My point wasn't that you were wrong about that. It's that the team obviously has ACC caliber players. In fact, you're claiming that they're not good enough to be in the ACC and then in your next post predicting 7 wins for them. Which is it? Almost .500 in the ACC or so woefully overmatched that they should be in the CAA?

We probably don't disagree. I'm just not going to go overboard. The team is horrible, and they're obviously going to get blown out on occasion. My guess is they win 7 ACC games, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the single worst performance I've evevr seen from any MD team in any sport.

I am sitting here watching this and I came to the same conclusion. Maryland has absolutely 0 inside game and their perimeter guys are playing scared. Watch the jumpers, no conviction at all.

At least lose busting your butt.

Interstingly up 40 Duke feels the need to apply pressure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In games like this, I always try to look at who is still playing hard and attemting to play the game right. I see 2 guys, Landon Milbourne and Sean Moseley from the guys that play regularly. The rest need to look in the mirror.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In games like this, I always try to look at who is still playing hard and attemting to play the game right. I see 2 guys, Landon Milbourne and Sean Moseley from the guys that play regularly. The rest need to look in the mirror.

Agreed. Although Bowie has played hard, he's just been overmatched.

Hayes and Vazquez were terrible. Hayes was getting beat off the dribble by Paulus, for crying out loud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed. Although Bowie has played hard, he's just been overmatched.

Hayes and Vazquez were terrible. Hayes was getting beat off the dribble by Paulus, for crying out loud.

Bowie is playing hard but Duke took away the drive from him and he does not have the confidence in the outside shot.

At least I got to see what Steve Goins looks like. Big Strong kid. Give him some time, what difference does it make.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
    • Elias needs to use better judgement when he dumpster dives, prepare better for the high percentage chance that his dumpster diving pickups will fail, and increase usage of other means to get pieces. Bullpen usage is another problem, but it’s hard to effectively juggle flaming torches. A wrong move burns badly 
    • I can see the case for Mountcastle based on defense alone, but what has Kjerstad done to warrant that kind of treatment? Is it the .505 OPS he’s put up since coming back? The overall .438 ML OPS since getting hit in the head? I’m as bummed as anyone that his season got derailed, but if you’re talking about where they are right now — he’s not your huckleberry. As for O’Hearn, he’s 8 for his last 23 (.348), with 3 doubles. That feels a little like the “getting himself together” that you referenced. He had an awful month-long slump, but he also has an extended track record (over 1.5 seasons) of excelling in the role he’s now back in, as the platoon LH 1B/DH guy. He had a 125 wRC+ in those 750 PAs as an Oriole until 8/20, which is roughly when Mountcastle went out.  I’d be good with Kjerstad DHing against LH starters, because there’s good reason to think he hits them better than O’Hearn. And if they want to play both O’Hearn and Kjerstad against some RHPs, in order to set up the potential of Mountcastle coming in to PH against a lefty reliever, I’m down for that too. But the primary alignment is going to (and should) be the Mountcastle/O’Hearn duo we’ve gotten accustomed to seeing.
    • The Achilles heel for this team is going to be the unit that doesn't step up in the postseason. I can easily see scenarios where: the bullpen is hot and provides good performances but the offense sputters and isn't clutch the offense comes up big but the bullpen blows games late starting pitching tosses some clunkers (not really likely with Burnes and Eflin) and they can't recover the defense sucks and gives opponents extra outs to work with, blowing games open when the bullpen or SP would have been able to escape and continue We've seen all of these units falter at one point or another during this season.  We've also seen all of these units perform very well at different times throughout the season.  So, we'll see what turns out to be the Achilles heel for the Orioles in the playoffs starting next week.
    • I agree I missed the mark on a correct forum, and ask a moderator to please relocate to Rants as that game annoyed me yesterday. I appreciate the strong moderators here and know I'm not one of them.     Sorry for making it worse at a tough moment.    I won't bump it again, even ironically if we kick their butts in the playoffs.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...