Jump to content

Ten Biggest Personnel Mistakes of the MacPhail Era


Anonymous

Recommended Posts

Completely subjective, but here's mine:

1. It would have been considerably cheaper in dollars, and only minimally higher in risk, had we extended Nick a year earlier. But it's great to see that we finally got 'er done.

Impact: Low (except to 12 months of my mental health)

2. The contingency plan for LH at SS was obviously a bit lacking (although it did turn out somewhat amusing).

Impact: Low

3. Last year's mid-season recalls, about one week apart, of Liz and subsequently Burres wound up burning Burres's final option (which would not have been the case had they been recalled in the opposite order -- and the imminent Liz recall was not exactly unexpected at the time Burres was brought back up). In the larger scheme of things, one can say that Burres has so little value that it just doesn't matter. But that doesn't quite excuse what clearly was some sloppy maneuvering over a guy whom the organization obviously values at least to SOME degree (obviously, more than they value Salazar).

Impact: Microscopic

4-10. Zippo. Nada. That's all I got! Everything else that I would have liked to see (e.g., acquiring a great young SS prospect or trading away some bad contracts last year) fall into the category of things that can only be speculated about in terms of what was available to Andy -- and therefore can't be subjected to criticism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 101
  • Created
  • Last Reply

1. It would have been considerably cheaper in dollars, and only minimally higher in risk, had we extended Nick a year earlier. But it's great to see that we finally got 'er done.

Impact: Low (except to 12 months of my mental health)

LOL... I love the last part.

In all seriousness though, call it Orange goggles or whatever you like -- but I think Markakis getting more dollars is going to help this team more than we know. 66 million to a 25 year old player isn't chump change. Maybe we could've gotten him for less, but who cares? You don't every single player in the Orioles organization didn't take note of this signing? It says if you are a contributor to this ballclub, we're not going to mess around. The Orioles just resigned a player who wasn't going to be a free agent for another 3 seasons. Adam Jones, Matt Wieters, Felix Pie (lol *fingers crossed*)... take note.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He did not sign Carlos Pena.

Result-We still don't have a firstbaseman.

Impact-We still would have been last and Snyder is coming along nicely.

Carlos Pena signed with Tampa prior to the 2007 season. AM came to the Orioles in June 2007.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. It would have been considerably cheaper in dollars, and only minimally higher in risk, had we extended Nick a year earlier. But it's great to see that we finally got 'er done.

Impact: Low (except to 12 months of my mental health)

LOL... I love the last part.

In all seriousness though, call it Orange goggles or whatever you like -- but I think Markakis getting more dollars is going to help this team more than we know. 66 million to a 25 year old player isn't chump change. Maybe we could've gotten him for less, but who cares? You don't every single player in the Orioles organization didn't take note of this signing? It says if you are a contributor to this ballclub, we're not going to mess around. The Orioles just resigned a player who wasn't going to be a free agent for another 3 seasons. Adam Jones, Matt Wieters, Felix Pie (lol *fingers crossed*)... take note.

The reason it would have been cheaper to extend him a year earlier (i.e., Nick would have voluntarily agreed to lower aggregate dollars) is because the incremental risk to the player of having to wait 4 years rather than 3 for the big payday is fairly consequential. So the club would have benefited with the smaller outlay of dollars; and the player would have benefited by paring down the risk. It would still have been a very fair deal for both parties (in fact, a BETTER deal for both parties). The reason it's not a zero-sum game is because of the asymmetric risk -- the player has only one asset in his personnel portfolio (himself), whereas the club has a more diversified portfolio to pool these kinds of risks. So it's reasonable for you to raise the concern that we wouldn't want to low-ball Nick. But that's not the way it would have gone down.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Not changing the locks on the warehouse, thus allowing Flanny to re-enter the building.

Impact: Unknown, but allowing a saboteur to roam the premises is never good.

2. Not getting the B'Rob situation taken care of last off season (either trade or extension)

Impact: Pending, but potentially high.

3. Trading Bradford and not getting any PTBNL.

Impact: Minimal. Slight demoralization and confusion of fan base. Makes us look cheap via salary dump to fan base.

4. DFA'ing Salazar when no other viable 1B/DH bench right-handed hitter types on the horizon.

Impact: Low.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a genius thread. Openly call McPhail out on his mistakes, and by doing so, reveal what an amazing job he has done and is doing. Love it.

So, I'd criticize bringing Trax back a second time. Impact: negligible. Not like he pitched any different than the rest of the bums we rotated through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a genius thread. Openly call McPhail out on his mistakes, and by doing so, reveal what an amazing job he has done and is doing. Love it.

So, I'd criticize bringing Trax back a second time. Impact: negligible. Not like he pitched any different than the rest of the bums we rotated through.

I agree with the bolded part. (Of course, I'm not about to disagree with the first part either. :))

We were also molasses slow in releasing Trax once it became obvious that he had nothing left in the tank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I just looked up the FG numbers through Age 25 starting in 1897 (for you, Honus Wagner), and Soto's 280 Offense number is 8th all-time. He lags both Trout and Pujols among modern guys - Cobb, Mantle, Foxx and Ott also up above 300. Ted Williams has him by a mere 5 runs for 7th place, though Teddy did it in about 2/3rds of the plate appearances, and all by his Age 23 season as military service covered his Age 24-26 seasons. Win a bar bet by knowing FG gives Andruw Jones a defense powered overall edge on Soto through Age 25. https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders/major-league?pos=all&stats=bat&lg=all&qual=y&type=8&ind=0&startdate=&enddate=&season1=1897&season=2024&age=15&age=25&sortcol=19&sortdir=default&pagenum=1
    • Here's my take. He's young - he's talented (but not defensively) - and he's not worth the money he will get. I hope the Mets or someone drives it up for the Yankees. I'd much rather invest in Gunnar everyday and Sunday. Better head, better future, better all around. IF the O's now have that kind of money - GET GUNNAR!!!!!!!!  
    • It probably becomes a pain to maintain them once you become well-known to the public.  I wouldn't blame him.
    • ESPN David Schoenfield guesses us as the Tanner Scott best fit.     Another generalist, Matthew Pouliot of Rotoworld, guessed over 100 contracts including a Seranthony Dominguez guess of only $6M forecasting that the $8M option is too pricey.     Pouliot has a lot of interesting names at $6M-$8M on 1-year deals -- Sewald, Yimi G., Leclerc, Kittredge, Maton, these are Elias' comparison shops figuring out whether to lock in Seranthony and decide about G. Soto at the later tender deadline. Best fit: Baltimore Orioles There are a lot of best fits for the best reliever available (Phillies closer Carlos Estevez is probably second on that list). Scott has a 2.04 ERA over the past two seasons with 188 strikeouts in 150 innings. The Orioles do have Felix Bautista coming off Tommy John surgery, but they'll want more certainty after the Craig Kimbrel signing didn't work out and their bullpen finished 23rd in the majors with a 4.23 ERA. Signing Scott -- and bringing him back to his original organization -- won't cost as much as a premium starting pitcher and could give the Orioles just as much value, especially in the postseason, where we've seen the necessity of deep, dominant bullpens. Two other top options: Boston Red Sox, Toronto Blue Jays We could also throw in the Yankees (Clay Holmes is a free agent), Mets (need depth behind Edwin Diaz) and Astros (but they already have Josh Hader on a $95 million contract) -- but let's add two more AL East teams. Only the White Sox had more blown saves than Boston's 31, and the Red Sox finished 25th in bullpen ERA. The Blue Jays' pen might have been even worse as it fell apart when closer Jordan Romano went down early in the season and the team finished 29th in the majors in ERA.
    • Spot on. I love Burnes. He was dominant in the playoffs, too. There are measurables -- and there are intangibles. He's off the charts on intangibles, IMO. But no way he's coming back for anything less than 6-7 years and nine figures. Snell and Fried are good targets -- along with any/all elite bullpen arms we can wrangle. Meanwhile, GrayRod will hopefully turn into what we would have wanted from Burnes. 
    • Complete pipe dream but why not. He accepts and comes then wow! He says no then ok it was a pipe dream anyway.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...