Jump to content

A's 2023

Three Run Homer

By Three Run Homer
in MLB

 Share

Recommended Posts

Three Run Homer Hangout Veteran Council

Three Run Homer

Posted
Posted

This team bears watching from afar, because they look like a historically bad team.  Consider:

--Their record through 40 games (9-31) is tied for the worst seen in MLB since the 1988 O's started 6-34.

--Their run differential through 40 games (-144) is the worst seen in MLB since 1900.

--Their staff ERA is 7.02.  The worst full-season team ERA in MLB history is 6.71 by the 1930 Phillies.  

--The 1930 Phillies played in the Baker Bowl, the most notorious hitters park in MLB history.  The Oakland Coliseum historically has been a pitcher's park.

--O's reject Jace Peterson is their regular 3B.  He's 33 years old hand has a 0.607 OPS.   Jesus Aguilar is also getting a lot of playing time. 

--Remember Ramon Laureano?  He looked like a great young player a few years ago, but he hasn't hit well since 2019 and he's now 28 years old.   

They have a couple of players having good seasons.  Brent Rooker has 11 HR and an OPS over 1.000.  He's a great story, but he's 28 years old and his best contribution to the A's future will be as a trade chip this summer.  Same goes for Zach Jackson, their 28-year old closer with a 2.60 ERA.   

Among their younger players, the best are starting pitcher Mason Miller (24, former 3rd round pick, 3.38 ERA in 4 starts), CF Estuery Ruiz (24, leading the league with 18 SB) and JJ Bleday, a former #4 overall pick who was terrible in the Miami organization but has been tearing it up at AAA and MLB all season and is still only 25.  

The A's terrible record is no accident, of course--they are fully committed to tanking, having traded away Matt Olson, Matt Chapman, Sean Manaea, Chris Bassitt, Sean Murphy, Cole Irvin and Joel Payamps for prospects in the last 2 offseasons.   It's ironic, though, that the most obvious tank job in recent history should come after the MLB instituted a draft lottery.   

 

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CharmCityHokie Major Leaguer

CharmCityHokie

Posted
Posted (edited)
30 minutes ago, Three Run Homer said:

This team bears watching from afar, because they look like a historically bad team.  Consider:

--Their record through 40 games (9-31) is tied for the worst seen in MLB since the 1988 O's started 6-34.

--Their run differential through 40 games (-144) is the worst seen in MLB since 1900.

--Their staff ERA is 7.02.  The worst full-season team ERA in MLB history is 6.71 by the 1930 Phillies.  

--The 1930 Phillies played in the Baker Bowl, the most notorious hitters park in MLB history.  The Oakland Coliseum historically has been a pitcher's park.

--O's reject Jace Peterson is their regular 3B.  He's 33 years old hand has a 0.607 OPS.   Jesus Aguilar is also getting a lot of playing time. 

--Remember Ramon Laureano?  He looked like a great young player a few years ago, but he hasn't hit well since 2019 and he's now 28 years old.   

They have a couple of players having good seasons.  Brent Rooker has 11 HR and an OPS over 1.000.  He's a great story, but he's 28 years old and his best contribution to the A's future will be as a trade chip this summer.  Same goes for Zach Jackson, their 28-year old closer with a 2.60 ERA.   

Among their younger players, the best are starting pitcher Mason Miller (24, former 3rd round pick, 3.38 ERA in 4 starts), CF Estuery Ruiz (24, leading the league with 18 SB) and JJ Bleday, a former #4 overall pick who was terrible in the Miami organization but has been tearing it up at AAA and MLB all season and is still only 25.  

The A's terrible record is no accident, of course--they are fully committed to tanking, having traded away Matt Olson, Matt Chapman, Sean Manaea, Chris Bassitt, Sean Murphy, Cole Irvin and Joel Payamps for prospects in the last 2 offseasons.   It's ironic, though, that the most obvious tank job in recent history should come after the MLB instituted a draft lottery.   

 

 

 

I really don't think the A's are tanking with the intention of getting better through higher draft picks; they want to tank to shed salary and cut costs to the bone to help them move to Vegas (or possibly ransom Oakland to keep them around). I think this is 100% a business decision, not a baseball strategy

Edited by CharmCityHokie
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Three Run Homer Hangout Veteran Council

Three Run Homer

Posted
  • Author
Posted
21 minutes ago, CharmCityHokie said:

I really don't think the A's are tanking with the intention of getting better through higher draft picks; they want to tank to shed salary and cut costs to the bone to help them move to Vegas (or possibly ransom Oakland to keep them around). I think this is 100% a business decision, not a baseball strategy

I'm sure cost cutting is a consideration too.  I will say this:  putting this bad of a product on the field is something you do when you know you're leaving town and don't care about your fan base any more, not something you do when you are trying to get Oakland to build you a new stadium.   I think the A's are 100 percent going to Vegas.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
Three Run Homer Hangout Veteran Council

Three Run Homer

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Update:  the A's went 10-40 through their first 50 games, the worst since the 1932 Red Sox started with the same record.  The only team with a worse record through 50 games since 1900 is the 1904 Senators, who went 9-41.   

They are now 10-41 with a run differential of -183.  They are on pace to have a run differential of -581 for the season, which would obliterate the current modern era record of -349 (1932 Red Sox again).  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ArtVanDelay Hangout Grand Counsel

ArtVanDelay

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, dystopia said:

Anyone else pissed that they played us so tough? We should have swept them. 

It is a little annoying in hindsight.  It’s tough to sweep any major league team in a 4 game series but the A’s aren’t a major league team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fiver6565 Veteran All-Star

Fiver6565

Posted
Posted
On 5/28/2023 at 11:57 PM, dystopia said:

Anyone else pissed that they played us so tough? We should have swept them. 

They just beat the Braves two straight. Even a really bad major league team is still a major league team that’s going to get a few wins here and there. 3/4 against any team is more than fine. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
Can_of_corn Hangout Grand Counsel

Can_of_corn

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, 86this said:

The A's on a 4-game winning streak and have won 2 against the Brewers so far.  And to think the Orioles could have gotten swept by the Brew Crew.

It's baseball.

Short series.

I think we all knew that despite how bad Oakland was they weren't Cleveland Spiders bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CharmCityHokie Major Leaguer

CharmCityHokie

Posted
Posted

A's now tied for the longest winning streak in the MLB after sweeping the Brewers (streak tied with the Diamondbacks who for some reason feel like our upstart-young rivals in the NL, the O's and D-backs have kind of been on the same timeline for rebuild and development, though they have much better pitching and an owner more willing to spend)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Posts

    • Aristotelian
      The Achilles heel for this team is the bullpen

      By Aristotelian · Posted

      Agreed, they were trying to preserve Burnes there. The division still hadn't been clinched, so try to win the game but within the rest management plan for your ace. Hopefully the fact they used Cano means there aren't any major concerns about his rest, but now you have to wonder.
    • interloper
      9/26: A Weak Effort In New York

      By interloper · Posted

      Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • Frobby
      The Achilles heel for this team is the bullpen

      By Frobby · Posted

      You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • Bemorewins
      The Achilles heel for this team is the bullpen

      By Bemorewins · Posted

      I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • e16bball
      DH - O'Hearn v. Kjerstad

      By e16bball · Posted

      Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • Fiver6565
      The Achilles heel for this team is the bullpen

      By Fiver6565 · Posted

      I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • Tony-OH
      9/26: A Weak Effort In New York

      By Tony-OH · Posted

      I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...