Jump to content

Thoughts on the draft lottery?


Mr-splash

Recommended Posts

Thoughts on this guys? Adley and Holliday were 1 overall. We likely dont acquire them with a lottery. Kjerstad was 2 overall. Cowser was 5 overall. We may not have gotten those guys either with a lottery. Rodriguez was 11 overall so decent chance he would have still been available with a lottery pick. Granted Gunnar was a 2nd rounder. Mullins was a 6th rounder if I'm not mistaken. You don't have to draft in the top 5 to get a franchise player. But I tell you, it's easier to draft 1 overall that's for sure.

 

I understand that the lottery is being put in place to deter tanking. But if you're a smaller market team like the Os in a division with larger markets tanking for 4 or 5 years is a genuinely smart move for an organization that is lacking talent.

 

We simply cannot compete in terms of payroll. Even if we had a generous owner. Our media market is just too small to sign all of our core and to out and compete in free agency. 

 

At least we got the tank in before the lottery. Those were the darkest years in franchise history, but it worked. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

Tanking is only good for the owner's bottom line.

It's not good for the fans, it's not good for the sport, it's not good for the players, it's not good for the owners actually trying to win.

Makes me miss the old days in which attendance was actually important.

Do you think there is value in drafting 1 overall? There must be. I guess it depends on how much value you put into it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr-splash said:

Do you think there is value in drafting 1 overall? There must be. I guess it depends on how much value you put into it.

Of course there is value in it.

But is the value worth the overall cost?

It is for the owner, but for everyone else?

I'm fine with not rewarding a team that is making no effort at all to be competitive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

Of course there is value in it.

But is the value worth the overall cost?

It is for the owner, but for everyone else?

I'm fine with not rewarding a team that is making no effort at all to be competitive.

Understood. The way I see it, tanking is justifiable in a league with no salary cap. Now with the lottery it makes less sense. 

Edited by Mr-splash
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr-splash said:

Understood. The way I see it, tanking is justifiable in a league with no salary cap. Now with the lottery it makes less sense. 

Now to me tanking is more justifiable in a league with a salary cap.  The players still get paid and the owner isn't rewarded financially for intentionally putting a non-competitive team out there.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Now to me tanking is more justifiable in a league with a salary cap.  The players still get paid and the owner isn't rewarded financially for intentionally putting a non-competitive team out there.

 

You may be right. I see tanking as a strategy used by small market teams to level an uneven playing field. No salary cap? Fine, I'll tank for 5 years and flood the organization with talent. Hell, I can't go out and sign the best talent. So I'll draft the best talent.

Edited by Mr-splash
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr-splash said:

You may be right. I see tanking as a strategy used by small market teams to level an uneven playing field. No salary cap? Fine, I'll tank for 5 years and flood the organization with talent. Hell, I can't go out and sign the best talent. So I'll draft the best talent.

Nice chatting with you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Mr-splash said:

Understood. The way I see it, tanking is justifiable in a league with no salary cap. Now with the lottery it makes less sense. 

I don’t have any issues with tanking for a year or 2. Hitting the massive organizational reset button is fine to do imo.

I have issues if you do it longer than that and the strategy becomes harder to pull off if several teams are also tanking, which is something we have seen a lot recently.

As for the lottery..I don’t really like it but also don’t care that much about it, especially since I don’t believe the Os will be impacted by it for quite some time.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

I don’t have any issues with tanking for a year or 2. Hitting the massive organizational reset button is fine to do imo.

I have issues if you do it longer than that and the strategy becomes harder to pull off if several teams are also tanking, which is something we have seen a lot recently.

As for the lottery..I don’t really like it but also don’t care that much about it, especially since I don’t believe the Os will be impacted by it for quite some time.

Good points. You are so right about the decreasing effectiveness of the strategy when it becomes popular and more teams do it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see why they need a draft at all if they have bonus pools and slots. If the last place team gets five times as much to spend as the first, then the talent will naturally go to the last place team.

My guess is two reasons:

1) Every other sport in North America has a draft and MLB isn't going to be creative/weird. Ooh look, the draft is on ESPN and dozens of people are tuning in!

2) It's easier to "negotiate", if you want to call it that, with your 20-odd draftees than with everyone. It's less work.

People will say things like all the good players will end up with the Yanks or Dodgers, but prior to the draft and way before pools and slots the Orioles signed Brooks, Palmer, Boog, and most of the core of the 1966 champs. Players go where they have opportunity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The AL Central tanks as a division annually. At present they are near 40 games under .500 a couple years ago they were 120+ games under .500 as the end of the year, yet one of the teams makes the playoffs. Even when the O's "tanked" they had a tough schedule with 40% being played in division. Baseball has some serious issues. The union will never allow salary caps, the owners will never allow salary minimum. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Of course there is value in it.

But is the value worth the overall cost?

It is for the owner, but for everyone else?

I'm fine with not rewarding a team that is making no effort at all to be competitive.

There is a predictable relationship between draft slot and career value over many picks. The #1 overall pick is very clearly the most valuable pick, and each draft position after that steps down in value a little bit.

But individual draftees, rounds, and years are very noisy. Pick a random year... 2009.  The most valuable first rounders were #25, #1, #6, #17, and #7.  But if you total all picks ever, the highest value is (or is very close to) overall picks #1, 2, 3, 4, 5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
    • Yeah the amenities are pretty outdated at the yard and they seem to do nothing year over year to improve them. The touchscreens have been banged on to death to the point they barely function, so you can't accurately fill out your order at the kiosks, and they don't have a way for the people behind the counter to ring you up at many of the food places. The sound is low to non-existent in certain sections of the club level, like around 218. Seems like there should be speakers that reach there but they might have been damaged by rain, etc. and they are too lazy to fix them. If you go to a game that's even slightly busy, you will wait forever to get into the bathroom, and the sink will be an absolute mess with no soap or paper towels. It's even worse on the club level where they have one sink that's right by the door. Nearby businesses don't care, either. The Hilton parking garage reeks of decay, pot and human waste. They don't turn on the air circulation fans, even if cars are waiting for an hour and a half to exit from P3, filling up the air with carbon monoxide. They only let you enter the stadium with one 20 oz bottle of water. It's so expensive to buy a drink or water in the stadium, but with all the salty food, 20 oz of water isn't enough, especially on a hot day. Vegetarian food options are poor to none, other than things like chips, fries, hot pretzels and the occasional pizza. Vida Taco is better, but at an inconvenient location for many seats. The doors on the club level are not accessible. They're anti-accessible. Big, heavy doors you have to go through to get to/from the escalators, and big, heavy doors to get to your seats, none of them automatic (or even with the option to be automatic with a button press). Makes it hard to carry food out to your seats even if not handicapped. The furniture in the lounges on the club level seem designed to allow as few people as possible to sit down. Not great when we have so many rain delays during the season. Should put more, smaller chairs in and allow more of the club level ticket holders to have a seat while waiting for thunderstorms to pass. They keep a lot of the entrance/exit gates closed except for playoff/sellout games, which means people have to slowly "mooooo" all the way down Eutaw St to get to parking. They are too cheap to staff all the gates, so they make people exit by the warehouse, even though it would be a lot more convenient for many fans to open all the gates. Taking Light Rail would be super convenient, except that if there's at least 20k fans in attendance, it's common to have to wait 90-120 minutes to be able to board a non-full train heading toward Glen Burnie. A few trains might come by, but they are already full, or fill up fast when folks walk up to the Convention Center stop to pre-empt the folks trying to board at Camden Station. None of the garages in the area are set up to require pre-payment on entry (reservation, or give them your card / digital payment at the entrance till). If they were, emptying out the garage would be very quick, as they wouldn't need to ticket anyone on the way out: if you can't get in without paying, you can always just leave without having to stop and scan your phone or put a ticket in the machine. They shut down the Sports Legends Museum at Camden Station in 2015 because the Maryland Stadium Authority was too greedy. That place was a fun distraction if you were in the area when a game wasn't about to start, like if you show up super early on Opening Day or a playoff day. Superbook's restaurant on Eutaw is a huge downgrade from Dempsey's in terms of menu and service quality. Dempsey's used to be well-staffed, you could reserve a table online, and they had all kinds of great selection for every diet. Superbook seems like just another bar serving the same swill that the rest of the park serves, with extremely minimal and low-quality food. For that matter, most of the food at the stadium is very low quality these days. A lot of things we used to love are made to a lower standard now if they are served at all. These are gripes about the stadium and the area that haven't changed my entire adult life. Going to an O's game requires one to tolerate many small inconveniences and several major inconveniences, any number of which could easily be fixed by the relevant authorities if they gave a damn about the people who pay to come see the team play. You would think a mid-market team would be able to afford to invest in the fan experience. You would think the city and partnering organizations like garages, the Stadium Authority and MTA would at least try to do their part to make the experience enjoyable and free of kinks. You would think they would put some thought into handling the "growing pains" of the fanbase due to recent renewed interest after the dark years. Instead, all we get is the same indifference and the same annoyances year in and year out. The whole area is overdue for a revamp. Not sure if $600 mil will get it done, but at least it's a start. Hopefully they can start to patch up some of the many holes in the fan experience. If you're not going to invest in Burnes, at least make it so paying customers have an easier, more enjoyable time getting to/from the stadium and having some food while we're there.
    • Elias has only been in rebuild mode with the O's so there's not much to speculate on there.  Houston, where he spent his formative years, doesn't seem to like to be on the hook for more than a couple of big long-term contracts at any given time.  I can see that as being Elias' choice as well, albeit with a lower overall cost - Houston runs a big payroll.  But it's all guesswork.  I really don't know. If Elias takes the 2025 payroll to $150 million it will creep up to $200 million or so by 2028 just from keeping the core together.  That's where I start to wonder about sustainability due to market size, economic forces, etc., etc., etc... If it were up to me, I would add a couple of free agents this offseason even if the contracts were longer than ideal and be conservative about extensions elsewhere until the prospects establish themselves a little better.  I think there's a competitive opportunity that the team is already into that's worth exploiting. I think ownership is very happy to have Elias on board and they're not inclined to force him to do anything.  I also think Rubenstein's demonstrated business prowess is great enough to assume that he has had plenty enough time to come to a mutual understanding with Elias as to goals.
    • We need a RH O’hearn…in addition to Westburg. At least 3 batters that will push up the pitch count and cause damage in the top 5 of the lineup.
    • Boy,  that Jackson Merrill is a good young player that is playing his best ball down the season stretch and in the playoffs.   He's only 21.  I guess some young guys are able to play up to the pressure.   Who could have guessed that?
    • I’m aware.   You are arguing something im Not.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...