Jump to content

Grayson Optioned


waroriole

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, wildcard said:

O's two first rounders Hall and GRod both in the Norfolk rotation.   Both with the same problem.   Great Stuff.  Poor Command.

Daniel Cabrera, Matt Riley, Ubaldo... the list goes on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t know what to make of this. It’s not like this kid is someone we were looking at with orange colored glasses. He was the mlb.com number one pitching prospect and to come up and get blasted like this? I can’t ever remember this highly regarded a pitching prospect having this kind of start in the majors. We better hope he’s hiding an injury although when you’re hitting 99 on the gun I can’t imagine what type of injury he could have. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Spy Fox said:

The O's have a better OPS vs lefties than righties (.791 vs .732) and better record vs lefty starters than righty starters (14-6 vs 19-12).

So, why are the vs lefty lineups a problem? I also want to bring up Westburg but it's just wrong to say facing lefty starters is a problem for the team right now.

Clearly a convenient gripe not supported by statistics.  

It's like saying we can't win on Sundays......and I don't know what our Sunday record is this year, but I'd probably have egg on my face if I made that claim too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, now said:

Daniel Cabrera, Matt Riley, Ubaldo... the list goes on. 

Ubaldo doesn’t really deserve to be lumped in with the other two.  He had a very successful major league career, and the other two did not.  His BB rate (4.1), while not good, was way better than Cabrera’s (5.1) or Riley’s (6.6).   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing I noticed early last night was how he lost focus in the first two innings......he got the first two guys out in both innings, and then proceeds to go I think 2-0 or 3-0 on the next batter both times, and walked them.  The second one scored on a home run, after getting behind that batter.  He's clearly not good enough yet to get behind hitters, give away free passes, and lose focus/command.

I really think he's just "throwing" right now, and doesn't have the mindset to Execute Every Pitch....not just throw it.

I agree with those who think it might be less stressful and a better learning platform doing long relief when he comes back up, or even just an inning here and there where he can be laser focused for one or two innings at a time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Sanity Check said:

Clearly a convenient gripe not supported by statistics.  

It's like saying we can't win on Sundays......and I don't know what our Sunday record is this year, but I'd probably have egg on my face if I made that claim too.

I think the Sunday punt obsession still draws its power from the months-long losing streak we had on Sundays, but that was 15 years ago now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Chaka Garcia said:

You can see why Elias favors hitters in the draft. Pitching is so risky. There is a chance neither become reliable starters.

Well, he also has not been very successful at developing pitching.

Bradish is probably the best example of taking a guy with a good arm and developing him into a decent starter. Kremer probably could be in that category as well to an extent. Maybe if you want, you can add in Tyler Wells, but was basically developed at the major league level vs the system.

The Orioles do strange things in "developing" starters in that they piggy back them, bring them in relief sometimes, suddenly give them a one or two inning start, and rarely letting them go over 80 pitches in any outing.

Neither Grayson or DL Hall have developed much under them and they were the best two arms they had. The only highly paid guy they drafted and have tried to develop is Baumler and he can't stay healthy.

They have put all their eggs in the position prospect basket but won't trade any of the ones that end up with value but prefer to stack them at AAA while playing veterans at the major league level.

If you can't develop an arm like Rodriguez and Hall, you have to question your pitching development guys. 

 

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, vab said:

I don’t know what to make of this. It’s not like this kid is someone we were looking at with orange colored glasses. He was the mlb.com number one pitching prospect and to come up and get blasted like this? I can’t ever remember this highly regarded a pitching prospect having this kind of start in the majors. We better hope he’s hiding an injury although when you’re hitting 99 on the gun I can’t imagine what type of injury he could have. 

He has "Lackofmaturityitis" to go along with his "lackofcommandofmystuffitis."

Hopefully he'll find it in AAA because no matter how anyone wants to shake it out, he was a giant disappointment through his first ten starts.

I was surprised about how bad he looked in spring training when he would let innings get out of control and clearly it's a continual problem for him.

He's just getting hit way too hard to often and I despite what the cracked reporters at the Sun reported, I don't think it has anything to do with him tipping his pitches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Spy Fox said:

The O's have a better OPS vs lefties than righties (.791 vs .732) and better record vs lefty starters than righty starters (14-6 vs 19-12).

So, why are the vs lefty lineups a problem? I also want to bring up Westburg but it's just wrong to say facing lefty starters is a problem for the team right now.

It's a problem because we have bad hitters at the bottom of the lineup. Just like I was saying that McKenna isn't as good as his small sample size performance reflected because he's not a good hitter, the O's performance against lefties featuring McCann, McKenna, Frazier, Mateo, etc. isn't sustainable. We need better hitters replacing those guys. 

To be a winning team - and to be a good GM, manager, etc. - you need to be proactive. You need to anticipate problems and address deficiencies before they hurt the team with losses. Reciting the statistics and simply reacting to them isn't enough. Talent evaluation and analysis of the statistics are crucial context to the results. 

You're basically saying, "The O's have performed fine against lefties, there's no problem, why fix something that isn't broken?" I'm telling you that the talent doesn't back up the results, and that we can expect the team perform worse moving forward using the same hitters against lefties. I'm telling you that complacency with the roster and lineups featuring these same players won't ensure wins and future performance. We won't know for sure until we see how the team performs, but feel free to bump this in a couple months if I'm wrong. Because I'll definitely bump it if I'm right.

McKenna, McCann, Frazier, Mateo - these guys aren't good hitters overall. Sure, they're better taking into account their strong-side splits, but that doesn't mean they should continue to get at bats at the expense of more talented prospects. Frazier has been hot, but I'm not sold on him as a good hitter overall. Prior to this season, Frazier has a long track record as league average hitter with above average defense - essentially two seasons as a well above average hitter, two seasons as a well below average hitter, and a little less than 2 and a half seasons as an average hitter. He's average. 

Just because a right-handed hitter is passable against left-handed pitching (or a lefty hitter against a righty pitcher in Frazier's case) doesn't mean that they should get at bats over a talented prospect who could potentially offer more production not only against left-handed pitching, but overall. We have three prospects who are ready to contribute to the major league team. Let's give them that chance and very likely improve the team while doing so. 

Edited by Brooks The Great
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, wildcard said:

O's two first rounders Hall and GRod both in the Norfolk rotation.   Both with the same problem.   Great Stuff.  Poor Command.

True.  But Hall also has control problems in addition to command problems, so he's got more work to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

He has "Lackofmaturityitis" to go along with his "lackofcommandofmystuffitis."

Hopefully he'll find it in AAA because no matter how anyone wants to shake it out, he was a giant disappointment through his first ten starts.

I was surprised about how bad he looked in spring training when he would let innings get out of control and clearly it's a continual problem for him.

He's just getting hit way too hard to often and I despite what the cracked reporters at the Sun reported, I don't think it has anything to do with him tipping his pitches.

I don't think he's tipping pitches, but he doesn't hide the ball in his glove well at all. You can see the grip in the glove on camera, which a batter can't, but it was pretty clear how visible it is on television.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Malike said:

I don't think he's tipping pitches, but he doesn't hide the ball in his glove well at all. You can see the grip in the glove on camera, which a batter can't, but it was pretty clear how visible it is on television.

I noticed this last night and if we can see it then you know opposing teams are picking up on it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I am not worried.  It just doesn’t remotely meet the eye test.  He has been great in the field . I can think of at least 3 outstanding plays he has made and not any that I thought he should have gotten but didn’t. Meanwhile Holliday is 3 OAA and I can’t think of an outstanding play and can think of a number I thought he should have made. 
    • Nicely stated Roy. Every since I was 9 years old and saw the O's vs. the Tokyo Giants in Tokyo in 1971, I've been infected with the Orange/Black virus. There is no cure and I don't want one. You and I sat at the lunch table with Jim Palmer at the 1970 World Series Champs reunion, and its still one of my enduring baseball memories. You said I looked like Carlton Fisk! I was at all 3 games in this Angels series, right behind the O's dugout. I got to see all our boys, and just simply love to watch this team play. And in true baseball fashion, the one game on paper we should have dominated (GRod vs. 8+ ERA Channing), we end up down 7-0 and lose. But watching Gunnar's homers, his electric triple, and he made a fantastic play today on a ball that went under Westburg's glove, Adley do Adley things, Cowser, holy crap. Kimbrel v. Trout with bases loaded, bottom of 9th, 2 outs, down by 2? That was fun. Next game Trout bats leadoff and torches a GRod fastball for a homer to the opposite field.  An observation.... If you didn't know anything about the team, and you only watched game 1 batting practice, you'd think Cowser and O'Hearn were the studs of the team. Mountcastle was taking BP with the reserves and he put on a show as well.  Home after 3 straight days watching this O's team, so jealous of the Balt fans in Balt that get to see the team with regularity. It's a special bunch.
    • emmett16 is right. Uppercut swings produce a lot of groundouts because the bat is not on the same plane as the ball for very long. The best swing stays on the same plane as the ball for a longer time. This will produce contact that creates backspin on the ball which makes it carry. That Ted Williams book is one of the best hitting books ever written.
    • I have to admit. I'm an addict. I'm an addict not of booze or drugs. I'm an addict for baseball .... It's still THE game for me and I love almost any team sport. But for me, when it's great, it's still the greatest game of them all. I hate to say it, but when my team wins ...it's like a hit of crack or coke and I have never and will never try those drugs. This one is a better high anyway. It's an adrenaline rush for me. It comes from my heart and soul. Like the other night in Anaheim I sat transfixed on the game. I dont need to look at the silly shell games on a scoreboard, nor hear what the players favorite singer is.. or eat a lot of junk, but I DO have to have my bag of peanuts. The Orioles were clinging to a one run lead, when, with the bases loaded, Mike Trout stepped up to the plate...a single and the game is tied...an extra base hit and the Orioles lose. Our pitcher Craig Kimbrel had to throw a strike to one of the all time greats, and somehow, someway, Trout looked at a third strike and the Orioles won. I lept into the air as if I had a million dollars on the game. I never bet on sports, but this was a better high than winning any bet anyway. Because it is pure and it comes from my deep place of caring when the 'Birds' win. Today in Anaheim, another nail biter, the game was in the ninth with two out and a runner on first. Suddenly the runner broke for second and catcher James McCann threw a strike to second base. Gunnar Henderson covering, made the tag and the ump called the runner out. And the game ended that way. Bang Bang. Personally I thought it was a blown call, but after review the call was upheld and the Orioles won another nail biter. I dont watch many other games, but every night I hit the crack pipe" of baseball. It's my addiction. I also love watching fantastic performers. Mookie Betts is an electric ballplayer . can do anything at the plate and in the field. The Orioles' Henderson is a must see ballplayer like Betts is. On Wednesday he hit a home run, a double, a single, drove in 3 runs got hit by a pitch , stole a base and made two game saving plays in the field. Baseball is a team sport but it's also watching the brilliant, mesmerizing individual performances. It's watching the best players in the world do what I think is the most difficult thing in sports , hit a baseball, throw a baseball, and field a baseball. It's hard to do. Anyway,it's still just April and it's a long, long season. Bryant Gumble once had a great line about the difference between football and baseball. He said "Baseball, is a never ending romance, but football is a one night stand." Yep, I'm an addict, a baseball junkie, and I make no apologies for it. I'll never go to rehab for my baseball addiction. I don't NEED to be cured. And I never will be. Jim Bouton said it best in "Ball Four" his great book. "In all the years you grip a baseball...you suddenly remember, it's really the other way around" Exactly.
    • Especially when you factor in the DL Hall trade too.  Suarez and Wells get bumped to the pen only if Bradish and Means are effective starters a decent part of the season.  Would the O's promote Povich or McDermott to pitch relief?  My guess is not anytime soon, but I dunno. A trade would for one or two arms would be best, but trading for good relief pitching is only harder now because so many teams can make the playoffs.  
    • But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield.  If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.   Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  
    • Wait, since when is money no object? It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in.  The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...