Jump to content

BA updated top 100


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

If Coby is gonna be stuck in Bowie because there's no room in Norfolk, why not use that time to try him out in LF/RF?

That seems like a much higher upside outcome than sticking him at 1B. Arms like his don't grow on trees.

I don't get not even attempting that once by this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know positional flexibility is all the rage these days, and deservedly so. But sometimes, it's ok to just be a DH 80% of the time who can play a little 1B and a little RF in a pinch. If Mayo ends up being a better Mancini with more power and a better arm, then that's still a successful draft pick and I'd take that guy on my team all day. 

Edited by interloper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, interloper said:

I know positional flexibility is all the rage these days, and deservedly so. But sometimes, it's ok to just be a DH 80% of the time who can play a little 1B and a little RF in a pinch. If Mayo ends up being a better Mancini with more power and a better arm, then that's still a successful draft pick and I'd take that guy on my team all day. 

Why would you treat that as anything but a last resort though?

If this lineup is going to be as stacked as we think it could be, then the flexibility that keeping that slot open offers is important. And it's especially difficult to justify a true DH when your catcher is a guy who you want in the lineup every day.

Plus in Coby's case, his arm is a plus tool that is worth trying to work in somewhere.

He's going to be moved off of third because of the existence of Gunnar/Holliday/Ortiz. Try to utilize the arm at LF/RF. If that doesn't work, see if 1B is open. Only if all of that fails and his bat justifies it do you put him at DH imo.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Alasdaire said:

Why would you treat that as anything but a last resort though?

If this lineup is going to be as stacked as we think it could be, then the flexibility that keeping that slot open offers is important. And it's especially difficult to justify a true DH when your catcher is a guy who you want in the lineup every day.

Plus in Coby's case, his arm is a plus tool that is worth trying to work in somewhere.

He's going to be moved off of third because of the existence of Gunnar/Holliday/Ortiz. Try to utilize the arm at LF/RF. If that doesn't work, see if 1B is open. Only if all of that fails and his bat justifies it do you put him at DH imo.

Sure, I agree. I'm just saying if he ends up a DH eventually, that's ok. Because he should be a very, very good one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, interloper said:

Sure, I agree. I'm just saying if he ends up a DH eventually, that's ok. Because he should be a very, very good one. 

If his bat is has enough juice to demand a DH spot amidst all of the other guys on the 2024+ roster, then I'll be fine with it too 😁

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Alasdaire said:

If Coby is gonna be stuck in Bowie because there's no room in Norfolk, why not use that time to try him out in LF/RF?

That seems like a much higher upside outcome than sticking him at 1B. Arms like his don't grow on trees.

I don't get not even attempting that once by this point.

They could be showcasing him and keeping him at third. I hope not and I don’t want him traded but I could see it happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

They could be showcasing him and keeping him at third. I hope not and I don’t want him traded but I could see it happening.

That's possible I suppose. Or maybe they've had him take fly balls in practice and he struggled enough with tracking them that they don't want to put that out on actual game tape.

But if the O's valuation of Mayo is closer to most of us here than that of some national publications like BA, I would think he's in the tier of guys that is just below the untouchables (Adley/Gunnar/Jackson).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

I think that's a fair assessment of his defense at 3B. I think he has a little more mobility side to side than Nevin, but coming in on balls is not his strength. Literally all of the guys you mentioned are better defensive 3B than Mayo, so Mayo may need to learn 1B.

Mayo now has a career .898 FLD pct in 175 games at 3B. I think it's fair to have some concerns about him defensively at 3B despite the good arm. I'd like to see him get more time at 1B and even some in RF myself just to get him the experience. 

He may slow down too much to be affective in RF longterm but he has the arm for it. 1B is his most likely major league position and personally he should start being a priority play there.

 

 

In general do you think it's tough to scout for 3rd basemen defensively?  I feel like sometimes you get a big guy that doesn't look like he can field the position, and then he goes out there and is a vacuum cleaner at 3rd and gobbles up those slow rollers in his sleep.  And sometimes you get Melvin Mora or Wilson Betemit who misses that play 50% of the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hallas said:

 

In general do you think it's tough to scout for 3rd basemen defensively?  I feel like sometimes you get a big guy that doesn't look like he can field the position, and then he goes out there and is a vacuum cleaner at 3rd and gobbles up those slow rollers in his sleep.  And sometimes you get Melvin Mora or Wilson Betemit who misses that play 50% of the time.

Unless you watch every single game it's hard to get  a complete picture without statcast data. Obviously when you scout you can only judge what you see on the plays that player makes on the games you are watching. 

Obviously arm strength is the easiest to judge but hopefully you get a few tough plays in or side to side to give you a general idea. I typically will go back and watch a fielder's errors to get an idea of what they struggle with and hopefully catch those good plays in the other times.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AnythingO's said:

I don't think Mayo has the foot speed to be a COF although he surely has the arm for RF. With his experience on the dirt wouldn't it make more sense to groom him for 1B and Heston for RF/DH??

It would make sense to me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Gotta think Bradfield is right around 100.  I suspect he makes the off-season list.   Amazing drops.  Termarr Johnson at 97 and Druw Jones at 99.   BA doesn’t usually drop guys down that far that quickly.   Frankly, I’m very surprised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...