Jump to content

Let's talk about Jordan Montgomery


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

Being officially into the second half of June, outcomes for some of the in-between teams are clarifying.     STL looks here like they have gone past a point of no return in the last week.

Adam Wainwright chasing one more drop of glory seems to have picked wrong bypassing the chance to sail off into the sunset with Yadi and Albert.

Lyles/Gibson wins by Elias against the other 29 Clubs so far have suggested a fondness for reliability.   Montgomery's 2018-2019 had the TJ interruption, but his 2017 and 2020-2023 attendance has been about perfect.    Across 2020-2023, Fangraphs sees 100 Qualified pitchers - Montgomery is 26th in Innings Pitched and 43rd in ERA.     I don't believe anyone ahead of him on either Sort is likely to move by August 2nd.

Montgomery has completed 14 turns already this season, probably has about 6 more before the deadline, including a scheduled Nationals Park turn next week.     Oh yeah I want to throw him against the Yankees this summer and fall.

Miles Mikolas is weak, Jack Flaherty is lost, but sure it could be them as Elias shops around for efficiency.     Jordan Montgomery is good and has AL East experience.     Even beyond the presently hurt Ryan Helsley, Giovanny Gallegos and Jordan Hicks are Arms I would love to see what Holt could do with, but keeping guesses simplest....

Are you offering DL Hall for a Jordan Montgomery rental?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to rain on your post but I don't see Elias trading value for a rental. 

I'm guessing he'll look for something more like one of Mateo / Ortiz / Urias plus one of Stowers / Prieto to MIA for Trevor Rogers and Steven Okert. That gives him his rotation guy and BP help. Both are '27 FA's. Okert is running a 39% K rate right now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Classic OH let's get rid of everyone I want gone trade offer.

Just like the Cardinals would covet Mountcastle.

Montgomery is a rental right? Irvin is younger and under control next year as well. StL as a history of fixing pitchers. The prospect list is everyone under Ortiz, I actually meant to include Ortiz as well but was rushing before going offline. So 1.5 yrs of a MLB pitcher and some prospect or 2 that fills a need of theirs. Might not be of interest to them but it isn't embarrassing for a rental.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, EddeeEddee said:

It's a big risk for the O's to trade for rentals.  Even though I think pitching is more important I'd rather trade for Goldschmidt since he's got another year on his contract.

Do you think they can get where we want them to go without accepting some risk?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, 7Mo said:

Not to rain on your post but I don't see Elias trading value for a rental. 

I'm guessing he'll look for something more like one of Mateo / Ortiz / Urias plus one of Stowers / Prieto to MIA for Trevor Rogers and Steven Okert. That gives him his rotation guy and BP help. Both are '27 FA's. Okert is running a 39% K rate right now. 

Certainly the Marlins match up as we've been discussing for years, but Rogers probably needs to show a lot of health next six weeks for Elias to consider.     

Though it would be fun around here if he acquired another Hurt Pitcher - Seth Johnson last year there was more latitude to ignore Present Wins.

Agree it would be a new and riskier move for Elias, but Sellers will be able to obtain value for rentals, so it is just a question of will you pay (talent) to play.     Montgomery I do think fits several of Elias' criteria - durable, long track record, not too expensive.    

Probably more of a needle nudger than a needle mover, but I do think he would concentrate strength of personnel in a 3 or 5 game series from what we could now do.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

That's the worst trade offer ever.  That might get you a below average reliever.

Norby is a top 100 prospect.  I know he gets overlooked here but he is highly regarded by many of the National publication and scouts.  He is ranked around the same place ERod was when he was traded for Miller.  Norby alone should get you a good bullpen piece.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, EddeeEddee said:

There's always risk in trades.  But trading for a rental is probably too big a risk for a team that doesn't spend money anymore.

Elias likes rentals, they aren't under contract next year.  That's a feature, not a bug.

Anyway, you need to accept risk.  The stars are not going to align to give the O's a cost effective impact player with years of team control for peanuts.

If you sit there waiting for the best deal you end up sitting out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Agreed, they were trying to preserve Burnes there. The division still hadn't been clinched, so try to win the game but within the rest management plan for your ace. Hopefully the fact they used Cano means there aren't any major concerns about his rest, but now you have to wonder.
    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...