Jump to content

2B/3B/SS playing time for the next 30 games


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Tell me what you’d like to see over the next 30 games, assuming Westburg, Henderson, Mateo, Frazier and Urias are all still on the roster and Ortiz isn’t.  Be specific, how many games for each guy at each spot.   

Here’s mine:

2B: Westburg 20,  Frazier 10

3B: Urias 20,  Henderson 8, Westburg 2

SS: Henderson 20, Mateo 10

Needless to say, you might also see Urias at 1B in a couple of games, or any of Westburg, Urias or Henderson at DH.

After these 30 games, adjustments can be made depending on how players are doing.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty close to the OP, but I think Frazier still starts most of the time vs RHP, Westburg plays most days but not every day. What if we add in 1B?

2B Frazier 18, Westburg 12

SS Gunnar 18, Mateo 12

3B Urias 20, Westburg 5, Gunnar 5

1B O'Hearn 20, Urias 5, Westburg 5

After the next 30 days, if Westburg is performing, Frazier or Mateo is voted off the island and those AB's go to Westburg. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Tell me what you’d like to see over the next 30 games, assuming Westburg, Henderson, Mateo, Frazier and Urias are all still on the roster and Ortiz isn’t.  Be specific, how many games for each guy at each spot.   

Here’s mine:

2B: Westburg 20,  Frazier 10

3B: Urias 20,  Henderson 8, Westburg 2

SS: Henderson 20, Mateo 10

Needless to say, you might also see Urias at 1B in a couple of games, or any of Westburg, Urias or Henderson at DH.

After these 30 games, adjustments can be made depending on how players are doing.  
 

I'm listed based on starts, not just on how many total games.  In other words, if Mateo is on the bench I still expect he will get into quite a few games to pinch run or something.  I really hate that our only good replacement for Mateo is Gunnar, as I don't want to pull him off of 3rd that often.

2B: Westburg 20, Urias 8, Frazier 2

SS: 15 Henderson, 15 Mateo

3B: 13 Henderson, 8 Westburg, 9 Urias

I don't like feeling like I'm forced to still play Mateo that much, but based on the roster constraints (no Ortiz) this is what I'd go with, with some small changes due to pitching matchups or something.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ripken said:

30 games @ 3B - 15 Gunnar, 15 Westburg

30 games @ 2B - 15 Westburg

30 games @ SS - 15 Gunnar

...and whatever else.  The other 3 are not part of the future here.

 

I don't think I agree with the last part. I think Urias or Mateo would make excellent utility players down the stretch. That's an important role and you need somebody who can shift into different positions and play well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Put me in the same camp as @forphase1 that I really don't love that Gunnar is our only real replacement for Mateo (without Ortiz in the mix). But I'd still be very comfortable rolling out a Urias/Henderson/Westburg/O'Hearn infield 80% of the time. Mateo might want to start taking grounders from other spots on the diamond and get used to new throws. That's his ticket to sticking around here, because we know the org likes him well enough. He's been a good(ish) player for us through this uprise. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Sanfran327 said:

Put me in the same camp as @forphase1 that I really don't love that Gunnar is our only real replacement for Mateo (without Ortiz in the mix). But I'd still be very comfortable rolling out a Urias/Henderson/Westburg/O'Hearn infield 80% of the time. Mateo might want to start taking grounders from other spots on the diamond and get used to new throws. That's his ticket to sticking around here, because we know the org likes him well enough. He's been a good(ish) player for us through this uprise. 

Westburg has played mostly SS in AAA, but I agree he's not an amazing option there in MLB. Still, I'd think he is an option, at least for a few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of wishful thinking in this thread. Being realistic, I’d say something like this:

2B: Frazier 18, Westburg 12

SS: Mateo 18, Gunnar 12

3B: Gunnar 13, Urias 10, Westburg 7

Even this could be light on the games for Mateo and Frazier. 

Edited by waroriole
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, waroriole said:

A lot of wishful thinking in this thread. Being realistic, I’d say something like this:

2B: Frazier 18, Westburg 12

SS: Mateo 18, Gunnar 12

3B: Gunnar 13, Urias 10, Westburg 7

Even this could be light on the games for Mateo and Frazier. 

The OP said: "Tell me what you’d like to see over the next 30 games."  What you wrote is likely to happen.  What I'd like to see is Gunnar and Westburg playing every day with the rest being worked in based on matchups, health, and so forth.  I'm done watching Mateo and Frazier start but it's perfectly clear they will keep doing so.

Edited by Ripken
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Part of the difficulty will be .. what do you do with Mountcastle?  These scenarios with 1b starts going to Westburg are unlikely imho.. even Urias.  Mountcastle and Ohearn will get almost all the 1b starts.  And I guess the idea of Adley playing some first has gone away for now. 
 

The other problem is with DH and Santander and the Hicks variable. As long as Hicks is hitting he will likely be in lineup, and so Santander and Adley are going to need to take most of DH starts.  DH getting crowded. 
 

Westburg will likely take 3b with Gunnar playing SS for 15 games and then play 2b for 15 games and Frazier and Urias will split some at second, Mateo will be there when Gunnar needs to play 3b or off.  Frazier could also play an occasional COF backup against righthanders or if Hays needs day off. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Ripken said:

The OP said: "Tell me what you’d like to see over the next 30 games."  What you wrote is likely to happen.  What I'd like to see is Gunnar and Westburg playing every day with the rest being worked in based on matchups, health, and so forth.  I'm done watching Mateo and Frazier start but it's perfectly clear they will keep doing so.

Ahh, me and reading comprehension. In that case:

2B: Westburg 20, Urias 5, Frazier 5

SS: Gunnar 25, Mateo 5

3B: Urias 22, Westburg 5, Gunnar 3

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, waroriole said:

A lot of wishful thinking in this thread. Being realistic, I’d say something like this:

2B: Frazier 18, Westburg 12

SS: Mateo 18, Gunnar 12

3B: Gunnar 13, Urias 10, Westburg 7

Even this could be light on the games for Mateo and Frazier. 

What’s wishful thinking?  I asked what people would like to see, not to predict what would happen.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2B:  Frazier 14, Westie (lots of T-shirt possibilities there) 12, Urias 4
  • SS:  Gunnar 14, Mateo 12, Westie 4
  • 3B:  Gunnar 13, Gold Glove Urias 10, Westie 7

Total Starts (Isn't that what really matter here?):  Gunnar 27, Westie 23, Frazier 14, Urias 14, Matteo 12 

Given Hyde's near-obsession with maximizing platoon matchups, I think there will be plenty of games where two guys each get 3 innings or more at a position, and some where the starter sometimes plays there for less than half a game. There also will be -- and should be -- lots of instances where a starter moves to a different position during the course of a game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Any jerk wad want to congratulate Duke Basketball or the Steelers? just go ahead and piss me off even more 
    • Agreed, they were trying to preserve Burnes there. The division still hadn't been clinched, so try to win the game but within the rest management plan for your ace. Hopefully the fact they used Cano means there aren't any major concerns about his rest, but now you have to wonder.
    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...