Jump to content

Anyone tried the Immaculate Grid game?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Today was tough with the ****ing Marlins. Missed two.

Spoiler

Jeff King, Miss, Bobby Bonilla

Aroldis Chapman, Miss, Juan Gonzale

Jeremy Guthrie, Tanner Scott, Albert Belle

 

One thing I've learned, don't submit a player until you've made sure he can't be placed in a harder square.  Bonilla would have been better for the Pirates/Marlins square.  

 

Edited by Moose Milligan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Today was tough with the ****ing Marlins. Missed two.

  Reveal hidden contents

Jeff King, Miss, Bobby Bonilla

Aroldis Chapman, Miss, Juan Gonzale

Jeremy Guthrie, Tanner Scott, Albert Belle

 

One thing I've learned, don't submit a player until you've made sure he can't be placed in a harder square.  Bonilla would have been better for the Pirates/Marlins square.  

 

Missed 1…can’t believe McCutcheon didn’t drive in 100 runs while in Pitt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Missed one today.  Cleveland/Cinci proved to be a problem, although I feel like it shouldn't have been.  Two teams that have been around forever with plenty of players.

Quote

Brett Butler, Miss, Kenny Lofton

Orlando Cepeda, Tom Seaver, Carl Yaz

Willie Mays, Pete Rose, Ichiro

Cepeda was random, but I've always had a weird interest in guys that are all-time greats (or close to it) and that bounced around to random teams at the end of their careers.  That's how I got Seaver, he looked kind of weird in a Red Sox uniform.  Steve Carlton looked weird in a Chi-Sox uniform, Giants uniform, Indians uniform.  I always thought it was funny that Joe Morgan bounced around to the Astros, Phillies, Giants and Athletics at the end. 

Trevor Bauer, Buddy Bell, Aaron Boone, Yankees hitting coach Sean Casey, Delino DeShields, Edwin Encarnacion, Tony f'ing Fernandez, Reggie Jefferson, Arthur Rhodes, are all names that I'm kind of kicking myself over.

I never would have got RANDY MILLIGAN as having played for both teams.  19 games with the Indians in '93, 83 games with the Reds in '93, too.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I missed one. I have almost no idea about who did or didn't win Rookie of the Year, so I whiffed on the Giants ROY. I guessed Monte Irvin, which obviously was wrong.

Spoiler

Joe Carter, Sean Casey, Shoeless Joe Jackson

Pablo Sandoval, Bernie Carbo, Shea Hillenbrand

Miss, Jonathan India, Ichiro Suzuki

I'm proudest of remembering Hillenbrand, who was a 0.05% guess. I just remember him coming along at the start of the Moneyball era being the poster child for "Hey look at this guy, we now know it's possible for a player to hit .300 and still suck big time if they don't walk and have no power."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Missed the first one out of the gate today.  40+ homers for the Nats, Adam Dunn was the first that came to mind...nope, hit 38 in back to back seasons.

303 rarity score.

Spoiler

Juan Soto, blank, Bryce Harper

Steve Garvey, Mike Davis, Cody Bellinger

Fred McGriff, Orlando Cepeda, Hank Aaron

Cepeda got .1%, Davis got .9%.  For A's/Dodgers all I could think of was the '88 Series but I knew Mike Davis was the one that got the walk to get Gibson up in Game 1. He had a horrific OBP that year and Eck didn't walk anyone but somehow he walked Davis.  He played for Oakland before the '88 series, went to LA and won a ring against Oakland the very next year.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/3/2023 at 10:17 AM, Moose Milligan said:

Missed one today.  Cleveland/Cinci proved to be a problem, although I feel like it shouldn't have been.  

Oh, Moose, Moose, Moose….

There was this guy named Frank Robinson who played 10 years for Cincinnati and later was the first African-American major league manager while still playing for Cleveland.  

My soul aches!

FWiW, I almost never complete the grid correctly (3 times in about 6 weeks of playing), but I got that one, with my personal best score of 83, more then half of which came from guessing Pablo Sandoval for SF/Boston.  I was shocked that 43% used that answer.  When I first thought of him, all I could come up with was “The Panda.”   Took me like 20 minutes to shake his name from my memory banks.   

I had some awesome answers on the .300 hitters:

Cleveland: Lou Boudreau (my mother’s favorite player), 0.8%.

Boston: Dom DiMaggio, 0.5%.

Rookie of the Year/.300: Al Bumbry, 0.07%.  

It pays to know the old guys!   Also, the franchises that used to be in a different city or even under a different name.  Like all the 1961-71 Washington Senators will work for questions about the Rangers, whereas the old Expos will work for the Nats.  
 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Frobby said:

Oh, Moose, Moose, Moose….

There was this guy named Frank Robinson who played 10 years for Cincinnati and later was the first African-American major league manager while still playing for Cleveland.  

My soul aches!

FWiW, I almost never complete the grid correctly (3 times in about 6 weeks of playing), but I got that one, with my personal best score of 83, more then half of which came from guessing Pablo Sandoval for SF/Boston.  I was shocked that 43% used that answer.  When I first thought of him, all I could come up with was “The Panda.”   Took me like 20 minutes to shake his name from my memory banks.   

I had some awesome answers on the .300 hitters:

Cleveland: Lou Boudreau (my mother’s favorite player), 0.8%.

Boston: Dom DiMaggio, 0.5%.

Rookie of the Year/.300: Al Bumbry, 0.07%.  

It pays to know the old guys!   Also, the franchises that used to be in a different city or even under a different name.  Like all the 1961-71 Washington Senators will work for questions about the Rangers, whereas the old Expos will work for the Nats.  
 

 That's the thing about this game.  I can remember Greg Vaughn, Frank Viola and Gary Pettis like 5 times each but I whiffed on Frank Robinson and the Reds/Indians connection.  It's got a way of making you feel really smart and incredibly stupid at the same time.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Today’s is vastly easier than any other day. 
⚾️ Immaculate Grid 125 9/9:
Rarity: 35
IMMACULATE!
🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩
 

Today's was easy and I was cruising along until.....

Quote

I tried to place Mike Trout in the middle square for Gold Glove/Silver Slugger award.  I thought this was a layup and for some reason he was the first player that came to mind.  While he has won nine Silver Slugger awards, Mike Trout has not won a Gold Glove.  And while that doesn't surprise me in recent years, I thought he had earlier in his career.

Anyway, my rarity score was 158.

Ted Williams 19%, Willie Mays 16%, Mel Ott 5%

George Brett 3%, Miss, Cal Ripken 5%

Chipper Jones 3%, Barry Bonds 5%, Dennis Eckersley 3%

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Today’s is vastly easier than any other day. 
⚾️ Immaculate Grid 125 9/9:
Rarity: 35
IMMACULATE!
🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩
 

If I could read, I would have 9 out of 9. I put my HOF/SS guy in the SS/.300 square by mistake.

Still had a rarity score of 142. That score can change quite a bit throughout the day as more people play.

My SS row combined for 7.8%
 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Another possibility: If you win game 1, maybe you don't ptich Eflin in Game 2 and try to win Game 2 without using him.   I mean, worst that can happen is you lose and have Eflin for game 3 anyway.   So you won't lose the wild card series without pitching your two best. But you COULD win the wild card series without your two best, and then you would have Eflin and Burnes lined up for games 1 and 2 in Cleveland
    • I like Law a lot, but that is a beyond asinine comment about not playing every day on a playoff team. You know how many playoff teams would slot him in the lineup immediately every game? Answer: the large majority. The Yankees would take Cowser over Verdugo The Tigers might not put him in over Greene/Meadows/Carpenter, but they’d DH him over their options. Cowser would start over every outfielder for the Royals, IMHO. He’d start over Meyers and Dubon for the Astros. The Guardians would probably start him over anybody not named Kwan in the OF, tbh.  I can keep going.
    • Even more of a reason to like FG over BBref,  tbh. Thanks, didn’t realize they switched this year. My point re: FIP is that I rather prefer it over RA/9, not to say it’s perfect. RA/9 treats all runs allowed by a pitcher the same regardless of them being earned or unearned. So, a pitcher on a team with a terrible defense is going to be judged much more harshly than somebody that pitches on a top tier defense. Not to mention the bullpen taking over mid inning dilemma. The funny thing is in your example re: FIP, RA/9 would have the first pitcher but love the second. Either way, these stats, like nearly all single solitary stats, aren’t best taken alone.  For your example, let’s say Pitcher A allowed weak contact and the defenders just had poor range, poor arms, whatever, but in the second example the defenders had great range and great arms making amazing plays to prevent any damage…then what?  Anyways, give me FIP over RA/9 was my point. But if you want to truly assess a pitcher, you’re going to need a few complimentary stats to go along with it.  
    • Really zooming the microscope in on one game with Tarik Skubal, would you consider batting Austin Slater 3rd or 4th to basically pinch hit in the 1st inning, and then replace him in LF with Cowser in the top of the 2nd inning. A tactic that might look good to the SIGBOT but could freak out actual ballplayers.
    • It would make sense. I think there are four possibilities for not announcing Eflin yet: 1. It’s going to be Eflin, we’re just waiting to announce to make it harder for Tigers/Royals to prepare. 2. Hyde and FO are discussing whether to slot Eflin for game 3 to possibly save him for ALDS game 1. 3. Hyde and FO are discussing a possible opener strategy for game 2. 4. Eflin has some minor aches/pains/soreness so we’re delaying the announcement to make sure he will be healthy enough. 
    • I can see the arguments for and against.  Gunnar may have had an opinion.  
    • I know I've been a Oriole critic these last few months but many of us have and deservedly so but congrats are really in order for a team that was decimated with injuries especially the pitching staff and still found a way to 90 wins and the playoffs. The first Orioles team with back to back 90 plus wins since the 1982, 1983  teams. Wow.  That's hard to believe. Also back to back playoff teams something the Machado, Jones, Markakis and Wieters led teams couldn't even pull off.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...