Jump to content

Anyone tried the Immaculate Grid game?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

9/9, 90.

And I was able to fill 8 of the 9 squares with Oriole players.... SO CLOSE to the perfect all Oriole grid!     I feel like I just missed a hole in one by an inch.

Spoiler

Mark Buehrle, Jim Thome, Luis Aparicio

Richard Bleier, RIck Dempsey, Mike Mussina

Bobby Bonilla, Rich Hill, Andy Van Slyke

And I could have gotten the perfect 9 for 9, as there were a few gettable guys for the White Sox/Marlins square:   Derrek Lee and Edwin Jackson.    But they didn't come to me.   Maybe I should have let it percolate in my mind for a few hours before giving up and going with Buehrle.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9/9 144

Spoiler

Dave Smith, Andre Dawson, Ryne Sandberg

Zack Grienke, Pedro Martinez, Davey Lopes

Joe Morgan, Pete Rose, Jimmy Rollins

Dodgers/Astros was the last box I had to fill and I couldn't think of anyone other than Greinke, who was the highest at 37%.  I was annoyed that I couldn't think of anyone else such as Don Sutton (who I've used a lot and couldn't remember if he played for the Astros or not) Jeff Kent, Kenny Lofton, JD Marinez and the immortal Jerry Reuss.  Gregg Olson was also an answer.

Jimmy Rollins was 31%.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

9/9 144

  Reveal hidden contents

Dave Smith, Andre Dawson, Ryne Sandberg

Zack Grienke, Pedro Martinez, Davey Lopes

Joe Morgan, Pete Rose, Jimmy Rollins

Dodgers/Astros was the last box I had to fill and I couldn't think of anyone other than Greinke, who was the highest at 37%.  I was annoyed that I couldn't think of anyone else such as Don Sutton (who I've used a lot and couldn't remember if he played for the Astros or not) Jeff Kent, Kenny Lofton, JD Marinez and the immortal Jerry Reuss.  Gregg Olson was also an answer.

Jimmy Rollins was 31%.

 

9/9, 106.  I didn’t really get a super low score anywhere, but the only place I had the most popular answer was Astros/Cubs.   I was surprised that answer was so popular.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used a “we thought he was gonna be an Oriole” for Hou/Chi 8%
 

A former O 3B for Was/Phi 1%

Former O OF (played with Brady and Devereaux I believe) for LAD/Hou 2%

HOF from Big Red Machine for Hou/Phi (Moose’s answer) 5%

Well traveled P for Was/Cubs - mostly known for being an A or Dback. 0.3%

WS hero for Nats/LAD 4%

Old timers HOFers for Cubs and Dodgers runs 2% and 1%
 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Like Icarus, I flew too close to the sun today.  Obviously I know dozens of .300 hitters in the Hall of Fame, but in my quest for a low score I guessed Lefty O’Doul.  Nope, he’s a .349 lifetime hitter but not in the Hall.  D’Oh!

That’s ok. I confused categories and guessed Jimmie Foxxx for the A’s.  I knew he was in the HOF and played for the Philadelphia A’s.  Couldn’t figure out how I was wrong until I realized that wasn’t even a category.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, it is possible to complete today's puzzle with all Orioles, though I would be amazed if any one could pull it off.   Looking up after the fact, I found that there is only one .300 hitter in the HoF that played for the Orioles -- Vladimir Guerrero.   There is only one 300 average A's player that played for the Orioles -- George Kell.  And Will Clark satisifies the .300 Cardinal that played for the Orioles.  For a Brave Hall of Famer who played for the Orioles:  Hoyt Wilhelm.   For an Astro HoFer that played for the Orioles:  Robin Roberts.  And to satisfy the 4 player blocks, there are multiple guys.   One set would be Bud NOrris (SL/Atl), Jace Peterson (Atl/Oak), Colby Rasmus (Hou/SL), and Miguel Tejada (Hou/Oak).

If you used those all-Oriole solutions you would have 9/9, 19 rarity score.

Me?   I had 8/9, 217.   The only square I was actually able to fill with an Oriole was Miguel Tejada.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Frobby said:

Like Icarus, I flew too close to the sun today. 

Second day in a row.  I’d filled out 8 of 9 squares, knew an answer for Yankees/Giants, but thought I’d remembered that I’d recently seen a Hall of Famer who’d played for both like 90 years ago, that I figured would get a good score.  Zap!   Wrong, so my grid was 8/9, 123.   Had a good score going until blowing that, though I suspect my “safe” answer to that question would have been pretty popular.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • My thoughts: - I agree that the Achilles heel is the bullpen and not the offense (especially with Westburg, Mountcastle, Urias, and Kjerstad back). - I also agree that Perez is overused in high leverage situations. This is going to come down to the degree you expect his “clutch” performance to be predictive going forward.  - I second the notion that most good bullpens are built with some degree of dumpster diving.  If you go back to offseason threads, there were not many desired bullpen FA targets (outside of unrealistic ones like Hader) that would have worked out well.  Maybe we haven’t “dumpster dived” well enough as evidenced by the success of Kaleb Ort in Houston. - Jacob Webb hasn’t been sharp since returning from the IL and Bowman has looked shaky his last few times out. - We don’t have a true closer, only a group of mostly effective set-up men in Dominguez, Cano, and Coulombe. - Part of me wishes they would be more aggressive with G-Rod and the Mountain. While we expect the team to continue to contend, you never really know how many times you’ll be back in the playoffs. However, I know in my head they are probably making the right decision. - I also feel like they should be auditioning McDermot, Selby, Young, or Strowd (who has been very good since August after rough Norfolk start). They could option Baker who I think is unlikely to have a path to trusted status after last year’s ALDS performance. This feeling may be mostly driven by dissatisfaction with the current state and wanting something better.  It might be unrealistic to expect options unproven at the MLB level to suddenly step in and be key playoff pieces.
    • Oh if we’re talking about what they will do, I can see it being something stupid like McCann at C and Adley at DH. I do think Mullins has enough veteranosity to outweigh Hyde’s obsession with L/R matchups. 
    • I agree…just not sure the Os will feel that way.  
    • Yeah I can see Rivera at DH. That’s probably a better choice than Kjerstad against Skubal. I’d definitely go with Mullins and Cowser over Slater. Slater has been really bad against LH this year. Only a .543 OPS. He’s actually worse than Cowser against LH and slightly better than Mullins. 
    • Not that it matters, but for some reason I took a lot of heat for suggesting mid season that Basallo would end up #1. It’s all good. We don’t have to agree 100% on everything. 
    • I don’t think he’s gonna be a part of any playoff roster, but kudos for him to rehab all the way back just to be an option for us if needed.  Also, hopefully now he’s shaken the injury and can have a normal offseason and normal fall instructs.  He’s a dude that if he could just be another Dean Kremer, would be huge for this org. 
    • My guess is vs Skubal or Ragans, the Os will go with an IF of Gunnar, Westy, Mounty and Urias.  Rivera will DH. Santander starts in RF. Obviously one of Cowser or Mullins starts but do both of them start?  Would they start Slater? Lefties hit Ragans much better than righties do this year. Everyone is terrible vs Skubal although lefties are worse.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...