Jump to content

Our Best "Touchable" Trade Bait is.........


Sanity Check

Recommended Posts

56 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Let’s assume that our rotation after the ASB will be Wells, Bradish, Kremer, Gibson, Rodriguez. Who is coming out of the rotation for a Giolito or Montgomery? Is Giolito or Montgomery an upgrade enough to justify a trade?  
 

Our best touchable trade bait is probably Urias, Mateo, Norby, Stowers, Vavra, and McKenna. 

I don't think there are any teams clamoring to get the guys that you named to improve their teams.  And of those guys, only Norby or Stowers might intrigue other teams.  Urias won't bring back much and the other two are bench players at best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does Norby not have value?  Just because we have a loaded IF/COF doesn’t mean that Norby still isn’t the 68th ranked prospect in the game currently. He’s only 23. He had a monster year last year. 

With all of our LH bats, Norby actually has value as a RH bench player. He’s the type of cheap bat you use for the bench. McKenna is out of options next year he won’t be back. Our 4th and 5th OF doesn’t really have to play CF because we have Cowser that can play there if need be.

I see Norby as an up/down bat to be used for matchups and to cover injuries over 162. 

I don’t see Norby or Ortiz traded. Especially not just given away because of our depth currently. I see those two as direct replacements for Mateo and McKenna next year.  Mateo, McKenna, and Mountcastle will all be dealt/DFA’d over the offseason.  Frazier and Hicks will be FA.

What other team can offer more than the 68th best prospect for a rental SP for 12 GS? 

Edited by sportsfan8703
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, connja said:

The highest upside infield configuration for the future is with Henderson, Holiday, Westburg and Mayo (1B).  Everyone else is touchable IMO.

Do we see Kjerstad as a possible 1B? He's got 4 errors in 19 GS which is not super promising. So far he has 20 GS at 1B vs 35 in LF/RF. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Best in terms of likely return? Or most expendable? Or best return relative to expenditure? I think the last is the most interesting. Maybe Norby or Basallo. 

"Best" in terms of who another team would really want, and that we would likely be willing to part with.  I called that "touchable", but apparently they all are.....personally, I don't see AR, GH, JW, CC, HK, GR or HK as players Elias is willing to part with at this time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Do we see Kjerstad as a possible 1B? He's got 4 errors in 19 GS which is not super promising. So far he has 20 GS at 1B vs 35 in LF/RF. 

It’s looking like we have something in O’Hearn versus RHP. He’ll be in Arb next year too. Kjerstad is a Santander/Hicks replacement for next year. Actually Stowers too if we move on from Santander. Remember Elias just isn’t giving guys away that will be very useful next year. Just because they’re not getting a shot this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In looking at the Cardinals and White Sox rosters/farm system… it looks like they would want pitching in return. Both teams have a solid core of of position players, but for whatever reason they are just struggling this year. I think all we could offer is Povich. 
 

Would Povich be enough to land one of Giolito or Montgomery?  I don’t know if Elias would trade a SP. We don’t have much and Povich is in AA. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

It’s looking like we have something in O’Hearn versus RHP. He’ll be in Arb next year too.

He might get too many RBI's to risk tendering....

He's putting himself in good position a few weeks shy of his 30th birthday to maybe double his ~$4M career earnings to date next season.

This has been a great run, but is it really going to induce a substantial fraction of an Adam Frazier contract from Elias?    Maybe he and Santander both are offseason trade bait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Frobby said:

That’s fairly in line with what he did last year at Aberdeen, and I’m happy for him.  In a Recent ranking of the A’s rather lame farm system, Eric Lingenhagen graded Hernaiz at 40+ FV and ranked him 10th in the A’s system.  I am not losing any sleep over the trade.  

I'm not losing sleep either. But I wouldn't mind having him in our system, even if just as a possible trade piece. If he was putting up those numbers at Bowie at age 21 (almost 22) at any time other than now, he would be getting a decent amount of attention. We're getting spoiled. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, oriole said:

Personally I really love the idea of a Henderson/Ortiz/Westburg infield for the next couple years til Holliday replaces Ortiz. I think if anyone is traded it should be the real fringe, yet still good, guys like Norby, Prieto, and Haskin. None of those guys have a real shot of getting enough playing time to even just prove they can take it to this level. 
 

I don't understand the logic of keeping Holliday down for 2 more years, just so Ortiz can play. It makes more sense to me, to try to get your best core of players to play together as long as possible, thus increasing you odds of winning championship(s).

Attempting to hold a space open for Ortiz seems forced and unnecessary. Gunnar seems more than capable of manning SS and giving us elite offense at that position. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sanity Check said:

I don't disagree with you about preferring to see those other guys traded instead, but if I'm the other team trading with the Orioles, I don't think I'd settle for those guys if I'm giving up someone to help the Orioles rotation or bullpen right now.....I'd want Joey if I can't have Jordan or Gunnar or Jackson.

I'm looking at it through their eyes, not ours.

A bullpen piece for Gunnar or Holliday?? Did you mean to say this or am I reading what you wrote wrong?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • The Achilles heel for this team is going to be the unit that doesn't step up in the postseason. I can easily see scenarios where: the bullpen is hot and provides good performances but the offense sputters and isn't clutch the offense comes up big but the bullpen blows games late starting pitching tosses some clunkers (not really likely with Burnes and Eflin) and they can't recover the defense sucks and gives opponents extra outs to work with, blowing games open when the bullpen or SP would have been able to escape and continue We've seen all of these units falter at one point or another during this season.  We've also seen all of these units perform very well at different times throughout the season.  So, we'll see what turns out to be the Achilles heel for the Orioles in the playoffs starting next week.
    • I agree I missed the mark on a correct forum, and ask a moderator to please relocate to Rants as that game annoyed me yesterday. I appreciate the strong moderators here and know I'm not one of them.     Sorry for making it worse at a tough moment.
    • Nail hit on head. It really comes down to the offense in the playoffs for us. I think our pitching is good enough overall especially the starters. Shaky sometimes sure, but they can hold their own most of the time. If we don't bring our "A" hitting game in the playoffs we won't go far.
    • The bullpen has warts for sure, but if this offense doesn't figure out how to hit good pitching in the playoffs, the bullpen won't matter. Even I got a little excited when they put 5 and 9 up on the board Tues and Wed, and then it crashed back to reality last night when I remembered they were facing Schmidt and Stroman. When facing a real ace like Cole they were completely shut down. What's gonna happen next week when they face Skubal, Reagins, and/or Lugo? The mediocre bullpen won't matter if they can't figure out how to score some runs off pitchers like that...
    • Why carry four 1 inning guys over a LH long option? Cionel stinks and should not be on the roster over Povich when you still have Akin, Coulombe and Soto.
    • Really would be nice to win tonight OR have DET lose so then they can play around Sat/Sun when the games would have no bearing on the seeding. Dont want this to come down to Sunday and having to win to get the 4 seed or then there will be some tough decisions that have to be made.
    • Looking for a big performance from him next week. This is why he’s here. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...